TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 1995

Cone Penetration in Very Weakly Cemented Sand

This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLY
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 121, Issue 8

Abstract

Cone penetration testing in very weakly cemented sands with unconfined compressive strengths of 60 kPa or less is investigated in a calibration chamber. Monterey 0/30 sand is artificially cemented with 1% and 2% portland cement. A miniature electric cone penetrometer that gives a diameter ratio of 42 is used in the chamber. Boundary conditions with zero lateral volumetric strains and a constant vertical stress are used. The tip resistance and the sleeve friction are both found to increase with cementation. The friction ratio is found to be indifferent to the increase in cementation at very weak cementation levels and vertical effective stresses of 50–300 kPa. Tip-resistance values at vertical effective stresses of less than 100 kPa increase over two times and over four times the uncemented values at peak cohesion intercepts of 10 kPa and 30 kPa, respectively. Although the effect of confinement gradually overshadows the influence of any weak cementation, tip resistance at a vertical stress of 300 kPa can still be 15–25% and 40–45% more than the uncemented values at peak cohesion intercepts of 10 kPa and 30 kPa, respectively.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Acar, Y. B., and El-Tahir, E. A.(1986). “Low strain dynamic properties of artificially cemented sand.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(11), 1001–1015.
2.
Acar, Y. B., Puppala, A., and Seals, R. K.(1991). “Calibration of a dynamic penetrometer for compaction quality control of boiler slag.”Geotech. Testing J., 14(2), 56–63.
3.
Acar, Y. B., and Tumay, M. T.(1986). “Strain field around cones in steady penetration.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(2), 207–213.
4.
Akili, W., and Al-Joulani, N. M. (1988). “Cone penetration tests on artificially cemented sands.”Proc., First Int. Symp. on Penetration Testing, ISOPT-1, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 2, 607–614.
5.
Arslan, S. (1993). “Cone penetration in cemented deposits: a field study,” MS thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La.
6.
Bachus, R. C., Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., Shafii-Rad, N., Crosby, J., and Kaboli, P. (1981). “Behavior of weakly cemented soil slopes under static and seismic loading conditions, Vol. II,”U.S.G.S. Rep. No. 51, July, U.S. Geological Survey.
7.
Baldi, G., Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M., and Pasqualini, E. (1981a). “Cone resistance of a dry medium sand.”Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 2, 427–432.
8.
Baldi, G., Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M., and Pasqualini, E. (1981b). “Cone resistance in dry N.C. and O.C. sands.”Proc., Symp. on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 145–177.
9.
Baldi, G., Bellotti, R., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M., and Pasqualini, E. (1986). “Interpretation of CPTs and CPTUs: part II.”Proc., Fourth Int. Geotech. Seminar on Field Instrumentation and Insitu Measurement, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, 143–156.
10.
Baligh, M. M., and Levadoux, J. N. (1980). “Pore pressure dissipation after cone pentration.”Sea-Grant Rep. No. 80-13, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass.
11.
Baligh, M. M., and Scott, R. R.(1975). “Quasi-static deep penetration in clays.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 101(11), 1119–1134.
12.
Beckwith, G. H., and Hansen, L. A. (1982). “The calcareous soils of the Southwestern United States.”Geotechnical properties, behavior, and performance of calcerous soils, ASTM STP 777, K. R. Demars and R. C. Chaney, eds., ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 16–35.
13.
Been, K., Crooks, J. H. A., Becker, D. E., and Jefferies, M. G.(1986). “The cone penetration test in sands, part I: state parameter interpretation.”Géotechnique, London, England, 36(2), 239–249.
14.
Been, K., and Jefferies, M. G.(1985). “A state parameter for sands.”Géotechnique, London, England, 35(2), 99–112.
15.
Been, K., Jefferies, J. H., Crooks, A., and Rothenburg, L.(1987). “The cone penetration test in sands, part II: general inference of state.”Géotechnique, London, England, 37(3), 285–299.
16.
Carter, J. P., Booker, J. R., and Yeung, S. K.(1986). “Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils.”Géotechnique, London, England, 36, 349–358.
17.
Charlie, W. A., Matthew, W. M., Tiedemann, D. A., and Doehring, D. O.(1984). “Cyclic triaxial behavior of Monterey no. 0 and 0/30 sands.”Geotech. Testing J., 7(4), 111–125.
18.
Clough, G. W., Sitar, N., and Bachus, R. C.(1981). “Cemented sands under static loading.”J. Geotech. Engrg., 107(6), 799–818.
19.
de Lima, D. C., and Tumay, M. T. (1992). “Calibration and implementation of miniature cone penetrometer and development, fabrication and verification of the in situ testing calibration chamber (LSU/CALCHAS).”Res. Rep. No. GE-92/08, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Baton Rouge, La.
20.
Durgunoglu, H. T., and Mitchell, J. K. (1973). “Static penetration resistance of soils.”Rep., Space Sci. Lab., University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
21.
Eid, W. K. (1981). “Scaling effect in cone penetration testing in sand,” PhD thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va.
22.
Fioravante, V., Jamiolkowski, M., Tanizawa, F., and Tatsuoka, F. (1991). “Results of CPT's in Toyoura quartz sand.”Proc., First Int. Symp. on Calibration Chamber Testing (ISOCCT1), Elsevier, New York, N.Y., 135–146.
23.
Frydman, S., Hendron, N. D., Horn, H., Steinbach, J., Baker, R., and Shaal, B.(1980). “Liquefaction study of cemented sands.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 106(3), 275–297.
24.
Ghionna, V. N., and Jamiolkowski, M. (1991). “A critical appraisal of calibration chamber testing of sands.”Proc., First Int. Symp. on Calibration Chamber Testing (ISOCCT1), Elsevier, New York, N.Y., 135–146.
25.
Harman, D. E. (1976). “A statistical study of static cone bearing capacity, vertical effective stress and relative density of dry and saturated fine sands in a large, triaxial test chamber,” MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
26.
Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C. C., Germaine, J. T., and Lancellotta, R. (1985). “New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils.”Theme Lect., 11th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
27.
Janbu, N., and Senneset, K. (1974). “Effective stress interpretation of in-situ static penetration tests.”Proc., Eur. Symp. on Penetration Testing, ESOPT I, Elsevier, New York, N.Y., Vol. 2.2, 181–193.
28.
Lade, P. V. (1972). “Stress-strain and strength characteristics of cohesionless soils,” PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
29.
Lee, K. L. (1975). “Formation of adhesion bonds in sands at high pressure.”Rep. No. UCLA. Eng. 7586, UCLA School of Engrg. and Appl. Sci., Los Angeles, Calif., Oct.
30.
Lhuer, J. M. (1976). “An experimental study of quasi-static cone penetration in saturated sands,” MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla.
31.
Manassero, M. (1991). “Calibration chamber correlations for horizontal insitu stress assessment using self-boring pressuremeter and cone penetration tests.”Proc., First Int. Symp. on Calibration Chamber Testing (ISOCCT1), Elsevier, New York, N.Y., 237–248.
32.
Mesri, G., Feng, T. W., and Benek, J. M.(1990). “Post-densification penetration resistance of clean sands.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 116(7), 1095–1115.
33.
Meyerhoff, G. G.(1963). “Some recent research on the bearing capacity of cohesionless soils.”Can. Geotech. J., 1(1), 16–26.
34.
Mitchell, J. K. (1980). “The properties of cement-stabilized soils.”Proc., Workshop on Mat. and Method for Low Cost Road, Rail and Reclamation Work, Leuro, Australia, 365–404.
35.
Mitchell, J. K., and Solymar, Z. V.(1984). “Time dependent strength gain in freshly deposited or densified sands.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(11), 1559–1576.
36.
Parkin, A. K., and Lunne, T. (1982). “Boundary effects in the laboratory calibration of cone penetrometer for sand.”Proc., 2nd Eur. Symp. Penetration Testing, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 761–768.
37.
Puppala, A. J. (1993). “Effect of cementation on cone resistance in sands: a calibration chamber study,” PhD thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La.
38.
Puppala, A. J., Acar, Y. B., and Senneset, K.(1993). “Cone penetration in cemented sands: bearing capacity interpretation.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(12), 1990–2001.
39.
Puppala, A. J., Acar, Y. B., and Tumay, M. T. (1991). “Miniature CPT tests in dense Monterey No. 0/30 sand in a flexible double-walled calibration chamber.”Proc., First Int. Symp. on Calibration Chamber Testing (ISOCCT1), Elsevier, New York, N.Y., 339–350.
40.
Rad, N. S. (1984). “Effect of cementation on penetration resistance of sand.”Final Rep. Prepared for Fugro Int., Rep. No. GE-84/01, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, La., June.
41.
Rad, N. S., and Clough, G. W. (1982). “The influence of cementation on the static and dynamic behavior of sands.”Rep. No. 59, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engrg. Ctr., Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
42.
Rad, N. S., and Tumay, M. T.(1986). “Effect of cementation on penetration resistance of sand—a model study.”Geotech. Testing J., 9(3), 117–125.
43.
Rad, N. S., and Tumay, M. T.(1987). “Factors affecting sand specimen preparation by raining.”Getotech. Testing J., 10(1), 31–37.
44.
Saxena, S. K., Reddy, R. K., and Avramidis, A.(1988). “Liquefaction resistance of artificially cemented sand.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 114(12), 1395–1413.
45.
Schmertmann, J. H. (1976). “An updated correlation between relative density and Fugro type electric cone bearing.”Contract Rep. DACW 9-76-M, 6646, Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Miss.
46.
Schmertmann, J. H. (1978). “Guidelines for cone penetration test performance and design.”Rep. FHWA-TS-78-209, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
47.
Sitar, N. (1990). “Seismic response of steep slopes in weakly cemented sands and gravels.”Proc., H. Bolton Seed Memorial Symp., J. M. Duncan, ed., BiTech Publishers, Vancouver, Canada, Vol. 2, 67–82.
48.
Tumay, M. T., Acar, Y. B., Cekirge, M., and Narayanan, R.(1985). “Flow field around cones in steady penetration.”J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 111(2), 193–204.
49.
Vesic, A. S. (1972). Expansion of cavities in infinite soil mass.”J. Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., ASCE, 98(3), 265–290.
50.
Villet, W. C. B., and Mitchell, J. K. (1981). “Cone resistance, relative density and friction angle. cone penetration testing and experience.”Proc., Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 178–208.
51.
Yu, H. S., and Houlsby, G. T.(1991). “Finite cavity expansion in dilatant soils: loading analysis.”Géotechnique, London, England, 41(2), 173–183.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 121Issue 8August 1995
Pages: 589 - 600

History

Published online: Aug 1, 1995
Published in print: Aug 1995

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anand J. Puppala, Associate Member, ASCE
Res. Engr., Louisiana Transp. Res. Ctr., Gourier Rd., Baton Rouge, LA 70808; formerly, Grad. Res. Asst., Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.
Yalcin B. Acar, Member, ASCE
Prof., Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA 70803.
Mehmet T. Tumay
Prof., Civ. and Envir. Engrg. Dept., Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, LA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share