Stress‐Path Dependent Shear Strength of Sand
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 6
Abstract
Failure envelopes of sands are often considered to be nonlinear depending both on relative density and stress level. Triaxial tests that were performed on clean alluvial‐quartzitic Zbraslav sand were used for analyzing the form of the failure envelope. In addition to relative density and stress level, the stress path (tests with constant‐cell pressure were compared with tests with constant‐mean‐stress level) has been found to affect the shear resistance as well. Only tests with constant‐mean stress produce nonlinear‐failure envelopes. Up to the peak‐stress difference, no shear bands were observed. Rough platens were used to simplify the procedure since the specimen's restraint was found not to affect the shear resistance for diameter to height ratio 1:2. The writer uses the percolation theory to provide the physical interpretation of the experimental results.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aversa, S. (1991). “Mechanical behaviour of soft rocks: some remarks.” Workshop of Napoli University—Experimental Characterization and Modelling of Soils and Soft Rocks, Oct., 191–224.
2.
Baligh, M. M. (1975). “Theory of deep site static cone penetration resistance.” Res. Rep. R 75‐56, No. 517, Massachusetts Institue of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, Mass.
3.
Bishop, A. W., and Green, G. E. (1965). “The influence of end restraint on the compression strength of a cohesionless soil.” Géotechnique, London, England, 15(3), 243–266.
4.
Boháč, J. (1991). “Trojosé zkoušky písku s kluznými podstavami [triaxial tests of sand with free ends].” ÚTAM ČSAV [Res. Rep.], Praha (in Czech).
5.
Bolton, M. D. (1986). “The strength and dilatancy of sands.” Géotechnique, London, England, 36(1), 65–78.
6.
Buckingham, E. (1921). “Notes on the method of dimensions.” Philosophical Mag., 42(251), 696–719.
7.
Essam, J. W. (1972). “Chapter 6: Percolation and cluster size.” in Phase transition and critical phenomena, C. Domb and M. S. Green, eds., Academic Press, London, 197–270.
8.
Feda, J. (1969). “Effect of structure on the shearing resistance of sand.” Proc., 7th ICOSMFE, Vol. 1, Mexico City, Mexico, 121–126.
9.
Feda, J. (1989). “Physical isomorphism in the mechanical behaviour of soils.” Can. Geotech. J., 26(4), 517–523.
10.
Feda, J., Boháč, J., and Herle, I. (1993). “End restraint in triaxial testing of soils.” Acta Technica ČSAV (Prague), 38, 197–220.
11.
Herle, I. (1992). “Jednoosé a dvojosé zkoušky se sypkými látkami a jejich numerická simulace hypoplastickým modelem [uniaxial and biaxial tests on granular materials and their numerical simulation with hypoplastic model].” ÚTAM ČSAV [Res. Rep.], Praha, 73 (in Czech).
12.
Kirkpatrick, S. (1973). “Percolation and conduction.” Rev. Modern Phys., 45(4), 574–588.
13.
Kolymbas, D. (1988). Eine konstitutive Theorie fur Böden und andere Stoffe. Veröffentlichungen des Institutes für Bodenmechanik und Felsmechanik, Karlsruhe, Vol. 109, 123 (in German).
14.
Mulilis, J. P., Seed, H. B., Chan, C. K., Mitchell, J. K., and Arulanandan, K. (1977). “Effects of sample preparation on sand liquefaction.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 103(2), 91–108.
15.
Smith, W. O., Foote, P. D., and Busang, P. F. (1929). “Packing of homogeneous spheres.” Phys. Rev., 34(9), 1,271–1,274.
16.
Tatsuoka, F., Nakamura, S., Huang, C. C., and Tani, K. (1990). “Strength anisotropy and shear band direction in plane strain tests of sand.” Soils and Found., 30(1), 35–54.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: May 13, 1990
Published online: Jun 1, 1994
Published in print: Jun 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.