Reliability Applied to Slope Stability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 120, Issue 12
Abstract
Formally probabilistic methods for the analysis of slope stability have had relatively little impact on practice. Many engineers are not familiar with probabilistic concepts, and it has been difficult to incorporate concepts of reliability into practice. Also, there is confusion over what reliability and probability of failure mean. The most effective applications of probabilistic methods are those involving relative probabilities of failure or illuminating the effects of uncertainties in the parameters. Attempts to determine the absolute probability of failure are much less successful. The paper describes how probabilistic descriptions of soil parameters can be derived from field and laboratory data and applied in stability analysis. The first‐order, second‐moment approach is explored and applied to the design of embankment dams. The example illustrates the relative contributions of uncertainties about different parameters to the reliability of the embankment. Reliability analysis is especially useful in establishing design values of factors of safety representing consistent risks for different types of failure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Alonso, E. E. (1976). “Risk analysis of slopes and its application to slopes in Canadian sensitive clays.” Géotechnique, London, England, 26(3), 453–472.
2.
Azzouz, A. S., Baligh, M. M., and Ladd, C. C. (1983). “Corrected field vane strength for embankment design.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 109(5), 730–734.
3.
Baecher, G. B., Paté, M.‐E., and de Neufville, R. (1980). “Risk of dam failure in benefit‐cost analysis.” Water Resour. Res., 16(3), 449–456.
4.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A. (1970). Probability, statistics, and decision for civil engineers, McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
5.
Bjerrum, L. (1972). “Embankments on soft ground: state of the art report.” Proc., Specialty Conf. on Perf. of Earth and Earth‐Supported Struct., ASCE, New York, N.Y., Vol. 2, 1–54.
6.
Casagrande, A. (1969). “Role of the ‘calculated risk’ in earthwork and foundation engineering.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 91(4), 1–40.
7.
Christian, J. T., Ladd, C. C., and Baecher, G. B. (1992). “Reliability and probability in stability analysis.” Proc., Stability and Perf. of Slopes and Embankments—II. ASCE, New York, N.Y., Vol. 2, 1071–1111.
8.
Cornell, C. A. (1971). “First‐order uncertainty analysis of soils deformation and stability.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Applications of Probability and Statistics in Soil and Struct. Engrg. (ICAP1), Hong Kong, 129–144.
9.
De Groot, D. J., and Baecher, G. B. (1993). “Estimating autocovariances of in‐situ soil properties.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 147–166.
10.
Halim, I. S., and Tang, W. H. (1991). “Reliability of undrained clay slope considering geologic anomaly.” Proc., 6th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Struct. Engrg., Mexico City, Mexico, 776–783.
11.
Ladd, C. C. (1991). “Stability evaluation during staged construction.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 117(4), 540–615.
12.
Ladd, C. C, Dascal, O., Law, K. T., Lefebvre, G., Lessard, G., Mesri, G., and Tavenas, F. (1983). Rep. of the embankment stability subcommittee. SEBJ, Montreal, Canada.
13.
Ladd, C. C, Foott, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F., and Poulos, H. G. (1977). “Stress‐deformation and strength characteristics.” State‐of‐the art Rep.; Proc., 9th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Tokyo, Japan, Vol. 2, 421–494.
14.
Lefebvre, G., Ladd, C. C, and Pare, J.‐J. (1988). “Comparison of field vane and laboratory undrained shear strengths in soft sensitive clays.” Vane shear strength testing in soils: field and laboratory studies; ASTM STP1014, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 233–246.
15.
Li, K. S., and Lumb, P. (1987). “Probabilistic design of slopes.” Can. Geotech. J., Vol. 24, 520–535.
16.
Luckman, P. G., Der Kiureghian, A., and Sitar, N. (1987). “Use of stochastic stability analysis for Bayesian back calculation of pore pressures acting in a cut slope at failure.” Proc., 5 th Int. Conf. on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Struct. Engrg., Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
17.
Oka, Y., and Wu, T. H. (1990). “System reliability of slope stability.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 116(8), 1185–1189.
18.
Peck, R. B. (1969). “Advantages and limitations of the observational method in applied soil mechanics: Ninth Rankine Lecture.” Géotechnique, London, England, 19(2), 171–187.
19.
Tang, W. H., Yucemen, M. S., and Ang, A. H.‐S. (1976). “Probability‐based short term design of slopes.” Can. Geotech. J., 13(3), 201–215.
20.
Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). “Reliability of earth slopes.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 103(11), 1227–1246.
21.
Whitman, R. V. (1984). “Evaluating the calculated risk in geotechnical engineering.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 145–188.
22.
Wu, T. H., and Kraft, L. M. (1970). “Safety analysis of slopes.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 96(2), 609–630.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 120 • Issue 12 • December 1994
Pages: 2180 - 2207
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 31, 1993
Published online: Dec 1, 1994
Published in print: Dec 1994
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.