Seepage and Soil‐Structure Interaction Effects in Braced Excavations
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 5
Abstract
Flexible walls and struts in braced excavations are designed to provide lateral support and to ensure that wall movements during the excavation are not excessive. Lateral pressures and wall movements are influenced not only by soil conditions, but also by other important factors such as drainage conditions and soil‐structure interaction. We use finite element modeling to investigate the impact of these factors on typical strutted wall system response, focusing on the magnitude and distribution of lateral pressures and the pattern of lateral wall deflections. For permeable soils, an important factor that affects the wall system response, is movement of fluids since it not only changes the magnitude and distribution of lateral pressures behind the wall but may also induce excessive ground subsidence resulting from vertical consolidation. Lateral wall deflections also may be greater for a smooth wall due to the loss of tangential interaction between the wall and the soil backfill. Finally, a case study on excavation through layers of saturated dense sands is presented to demonstrate the utility of the numerical model in situations where some provision for drainage is clearly appropriate.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bauer, G. E., Scott, J. D., Shields, D. H., and Wilson, N. E. (1980). “The hydraulic failure of a cofferdam.” Canadian Geotech. J., 17(4), 574–583.
2.
Bonaparte, R., and Mitchell, J. K. (1979). “The properties of San Francisco Bay mud at Hamilton Air Force Base, California.” Geotech. Res. Report., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
3.
Borja, R. I. (1990). “Analysis of incremental excavation based on critical state theory.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 116(6), 964–985.
4.
Borja, R. I. (1992). “Free boundary, fluid flow, and seepage forces in excavations.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 118(1), 125–146.
5.
Borja, R. I., and Dreiss, S. J. (1989). “Numerical modeling of accretionary wedge mechanics: application to the Barbados subduction problem.” J. Geophys. Res., 94(B7), 9323–9339.
6.
Borja, R. I., and Kishnani, S. S. (1991). “On the solution of elliptic free‐boundary problems via Newton's method.” Compt. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 88(3), 341–361.
7.
Brezis, H., Kinderlehrer, D., and Stampacchia, G. (1978). “Sur une nouvelle formulation due probleme de l'ecoulement a travers une digue.” Comptes Rendus del' Academie des Sciences de Paris, 287 (ser. A), 711–714.
8.
Brinkhorst, W. H. (1936). “Settlement of soil surface around foundation pit.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. Soil Mech., Cambridge, Mass., 1, 115–119.
9.
Clough, G. W., and Mana, A. I. (1976). “Lessons learned in finite element analysis of temporary excavations.” Proc. Second Int. Conf. Number Methods Geomech., Vol. 1, ASCE.
10.
Clough, G. W., and Hansen, L. A. (1981). “Clay anisotropy and braced wall behavior.” J. Geotech. Div., ASCE, 107(7), 893–913.
11.
Clough, G. W., and Reed, M. W. (1984). “Measured behavior of braced wall in very soft clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(1), 1–19.
12.
Finno, R. J., Atmatzidis, D. K., and Perkins, S. B. (1989). “Observed performance of a deep excavation in clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 115(8), 1045–1064.
13.
Hughes, T. J. R. (1980). “Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media.” Internat. J. Number. Methods. Engrg., 15(9), 1413–1418.
14.
Hughes, T. J. R. (1987). The finite element method: Linear static and dynamic analysis. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
15.
Janbu, N. (1963). “Soil compressibility as determined by odometer and triaxial test.” Proc. European Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Engrg., Wiesbaden, 19–25.
16.
Kikuchi, N. (1977). “An analysis of the variational inequalities of seepage flow by finite‐element methods.” Q. Appl. Math., 35(1), 149–163.
17.
Lambe, T. W., and Whitman, R. V. (1969). Soil mechanics. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
18.
Malkus, D. S., and Hughes, T. J. R. (1978). “Mixed finite element methods—Reduced and selective integration techniques: a unification of concepts.” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 15(1), 63–81.
19.
Peck, R. B., Hanson, W. E., and Thornburn, T. H. (1974). Foundation engineering. 2nd ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
20.
Roscoe, K. H., and Burland, J. B. (1968). “On the generalized stress‐strain behavior of ‘wet’ clay.” Engineering plasticity, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, 535–609.
21.
Scott, J. D., Wilson, N. E., and Bauer, G. E. (1972). “Analysis and performance of a braced cut in sand with large deformations.” Canadian Geotech. J., 8(4), 384–408.
22.
Tschebotarioff, G. P. (1973). Foundations, retaining, and earth structures, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y.
23.
Zienkiewicz, O. C., Emson, C., and Bettess, P. (1983). “A novel boundary infinite element.” Int. J. Numerical Methods. Engrg., 19(3), 393–404.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 5 • May 1993
Pages: 912 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Aug 8, 1991
Published online: May 1, 1993
Published in print: May 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.