Numerical Analysis of Drained Direct and Simple Shear Tests
This article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYThis article has a reply.
VIEW THE REPLYPublication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 12
Abstract
Drained direct and simple shear tests are analyzed assuming an isotropic elastoplastic constitutive law and plane strain conditions. The stress and strain distributions within the sample are examined. The numerical analyses are interpreted as if they were actual tests, using the computed stresses and displacements on the top boundary of the sample. Stiffness and strength results for the direct shear are then compared with simple shear results based on computations over the whole top boundary (average) and over the middle third (core). With the ideal simple shear as a reference state, simple shear results based on average measurements underestimate initial stiffness and peak strength by as much as 20% while core measurements give a better but not perfect agreement. Direct shear tests overestimated the initial stiffness and in most cases the peak strength by as much as 7.5%. Stress and strain distribution in the simple shear test become highly nonuniform as peak conditions are approached. The findings agree in general with some reported experimental observations. Analyses where strain softening was modeled did not develop any significant progressive failure, despite the nonuniform stresses and strains.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Airey, D. W., and Wood, D. M. (1987). “An evaluation of direct simple shear tests on clay.” Geotechnique, 37(1), 25–35.
2.
Bjerrum, L., and Landva, A. (1966). “Direct simple shear tests on a Norwegian quick clay.” Geotechnique, 16(1), 1–20.
3.
Borin, D. L. (1973). “The behaviour of saturated kaolin in the simple shear apparatus,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
4.
Budhu, M. (1984). “Non‐uniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus.” Can. Geotech. J., 21(1), 125–137.
5.
Budhu, M., and Britto, A. (1987). “Numerical analysis of soils in simple shear devices.” Soil Found., 27(2), 31–41.
6.
Dounias, G. T. (1987). “Progressive failure in embankment dams,” PhD thesis, Univ. of London, London, U.K.
7.
Duncan, J. M., and Dunlop, P. (1969). “Behaviour of soils in simple shear tests.” Proc. 7th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanical Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, 101–109.
8.
Hansen, B. (1961). “Shear box tests on sand.” Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics Foundation Engineering, Paris, Vol. 1, 127–131.
9.
Jardine, R. J., and Potts, D. M. (1988). “Hutton tension leg platform foundations: Predictions of driven pile behaviour.” Geotechnique, 38(2), 231–252.
10.
Kishida, H., and Uesugi, M. (1987). “Tests of the interface between sand and steel in the simple shear apparatus.” Geotechnique, 37(1), 45–52.
11.
Kjellman, W. (1951). “Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden.” Geotechnique, 2(3), 225–232.
12.
Lucks, A. S., Christian, J. T., Brandow, G. E., and Hoeg, K. (1972). “Stress conditions in the NGI simple shear test.” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 98(1), 155–160.
13.
Matthews, M. C. (1988). “The engineering application of direct and simple shear testing.” Ground Engrg., 21(2), 13–21.
14.
Morgenstern, N. R., and Tchalenko, J. S. (1967). “Microscopic structures in kaolin subjected to direct shear.” Geotechnique, 17(4), 309–328.
15.
Potts, D. M., Dounias, G. T., and Vaughan, P. R. (1987). “Finite element analysis of the direct shear box test.” Geotechnique, 37(1), 11–23.
16.
Potts, D. M., Dounias, G. T., and Vaughan, P. R. (1990). “Finite element analysis of progressive failure of Carsington embankment.” Geotechnique, 40(1), 79–101.
17.
Potts, D. M., and Fourie, A. B. (1984). “The behaviour of a propped retaining wall: Results of a numerical experiment.” Geotechnique, 34(3), 383–404.
18.
Prevost, J.‐H., and Hoeg, K. (1976). “Reanalysis of simple shear soil testing.” Can. Geotech. J., 13(4), 418–429.
19.
Roscoe, K. H. (1953). “An apparatus for the application of simple shear to soil samples.” Proc. 3nd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., Vol. 1, 186–191.
20.
Saada, A. S., and Townsend, F. C. (1981). “State of the art: Laboratory strength testing of soils.” Lab. Shear Strength of Soils, ASTM Special Technical Publication 740, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 7–77.
21.
Stroud, M. A. (1971). “The behaviour of sand at small stress levels in the simple shear apparatus,” PhD thesis, Univ. of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.
22.
Wright, D. K., Gilbert, P. A., and Saada, A. S. (1978). “Shear devices for determining dynamic soil properties.” Proc. ASCE Specialty Conf. on Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Vol. 2, ASCE, New York, N.Y., 1056–1075.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 119 • Issue 12 • December 1993
Pages: 1870 - 1891
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 27, 1988
Published online: Dec 1, 1993
Published in print: Dec 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.