Volumetric Rock Quality Designation
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 9
Abstract
Three different types of block sizes, namely, bars, plates, and prisms of various dimensions, are related to the classical rock quality designation (RQD) index by means of the volumetric joint count definition. Statistical models are derived analytically by assuming that three sets of fractures at different directions occur according to a negative exponential distribution function of the intact lengths. This distribution function has one model parameter, which is the average number of discontinuities related to the block volume and the volumetric joint count. Necessary charts are presented, which help to identify the representative block size within a rock mass provided that the volumetric joint count and average number of discontinuities are estimated from the field surveys. Furthermore, the global volumetric joint count is defined and related analytically to the nonhomogeneity coefficients in different directions. Finally, relevant analytical expressions are derived and presented in the form of charts for the relationships between RQD, block volume, and volumetric joint count. Accordingly, excellent, good, fair, poor, and very poor rock quality classifications are delineated on these graphs. Finally, the application of the methodology developed herein is presented for a set of discontinuity survey on igneous rocks in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Deere, D. U. (1963). “Technical description of rock cores for engienering purposes.” Rock Mech. Engrg. Geol., 1, 18–22.
2.
Deere, D. U. (1968). “Geologic consideration.” Rock mechanics in engineering practice, K. G. Stagg and O. C. Zienkiewicz, eds., John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
3.
Goodman, R. E., and Smith, H. R. (1980). “Rqd and fracture spacing.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 106(2), 191–193.
4.
Hudson, J. A., and Priest, S. D. (1979). “Discontinuities and rock mass geometry.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 16, 339–362.
5.
Kulhawy, F. H. (1978). “Geomechanical model for rock foundation settlement.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 104(2), 191–193.
6.
Palmstrom, A. (1982). “The volumetric joint count—A useful and simple measure of the degree of rock mass jointing.” Proc. 4th Congress Int. Association Engineering Geology, New Delhi, 2, 221–228.
7.
Palmstrom, A. (1985). “Application of the volumetric joint count as a measure of rock mass jointing.” Proc. Int. Symp. Fundamentals of Rock Joints, Bjorkliden, Sweden, 103–110.
8.
Priest, S. D., and Hudson, J. A. (1976). “Discontinuity spacing in rock.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 13, 135–148.
9.
Priest, S. D., and Hudson, J. A. (1981). “Estimation of discontinuity spacing and trace length using scanline surveys.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 18, 183–197.
10.
Sadagah, B. H., DeFreitas, M. H., and Sen, Z. (1990). “A mathematical representation of jointed rock masses and its application.” Int. Conf. on Mech. Jointed and Faulted Rock, Vienna, Austria.
11.
Şen, Z. (1984). “RQD models and fracture spacing.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 110(2), 203–216.
12.
Şen, Z. (1990). “RQP, RQR and fracture spacing.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 27(2), 135–137.
13.
Şen, Z., and Kazi, A. (1984). “Discontinuity spacing and RQD estimates from finitelength scanlines.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 21(4), 203–212.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 9 • September 1991
Pages: 1331 - 1346
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Sep 1, 1991
Published in print: Sep 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.