Technique for Using Fine‐Grained Soil in Reinforced Earth
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 8
Abstract
The performance of reinforced earth structures depends on the mobilization of interfacial shearing resistance between soil and reinforcement. This criterion typically eliminates the use of fine‐grained soil as a backfill material in reinforced earth structures. Considering the distribution of induced interfacial shear stress in soil around the surface of the reinforcement, it has been shown that only a thin zone of frictional material around the reinforcement is required to mobilize almost full interfacial shearing resistance of sand. Six series of pullout tests have been conducted, with different types of reinforcement, to study the effect of thickness of sand (frictional material) around the reinforcement on the pullout resistance. Sawdust and kaolin clay have been used as bulk backfill material, providing the soil with negligible friction. With low‐friction‐strength soil as bulk material, a 15‐mm thickness of sand around the reinforcement is required to increase the interfacial shearing resistance to that with sand as the bulk material. With this new technique, low‐frictional fine‐grained soils can be used as bulk backfill material in reinforced earth constructions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Jewell, R. A., and Jones, C. J. F. P. (1981). “The reinforcement of clay soils and waste materials using grids.” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. 10th Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Stockholm, Sweden, 3, 701–706.
2.
Jewell, R. A., and Wroth, C. P. (1987). “Direct shear tests on reinforced sand.” Geotechnique, London, England, 37(1), 53–68.
3.
Jewell, R. A., Milligan, G. W. E., Sarsby, R. W., and Dubois, D. (1984). “Interaction between soil and geogrids.” Symp. Polymer Grid Reinforcement in Civ. Engrg., Institution of Civil Engineers, 18–30.
4.
Jones, C. J. F. P. (1985). Earth reinforcement and soil structures. Butterworth, London, England.
5.
Palmeria, E. M. (1988). Discussion of “Direct shear tests on reinforced soil” by R. A. Jewell and C. P. Wroth. Geotechnique, London, England, 38(1), 146–148.
6.
Palmeria, E. M., and Milligan, G. W. E. (1989). “Sale and other factors affecting the results of pull out tests of grids buried in sand.” Geotechnique, London, England, 39(3), 511–524.
7.
Sridharan, A., and Singh, H. R. (1984). “Friction coefficient in reinforced earth.” Proc. Indian Geotech. Conf., Calcutta Study Centre, 43–47.
8.
Sridharan, A., and Singh, H. R. (1986). “An experimental study on mild steel as soil reinforcement.” Indian Geotech. J., New Delhi, India, 16(4), 334–345.
9.
Sridharan, A., and Srinivasa Murthy, B. R. (1987). “A report on materials and construction techniques of reinforced soil structures.” Proc. Int. Symp. High Tech. in Water Resour. Engrg., New Delhi Central Board of Irrigation and Power, 361–377.
10.
Wernick, E. (1974). “The influence of dilatency on skin friction of anchors in sand.” Deusche Beitrage, Zur Geotechnik, Essen, West Germany, 2, 57–60.
11.
Wernick, E. (1978). “Skin friction of cylindrical anchors in non‐cohesive soils.” Proc. Symp. Soil Reinforcing and Stabilizing Techniques, New South Wales Institute of Technology, University of New South Wales, 201–220.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 8 • August 1991
Pages: 1174 - 1190
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1991
Published in print: Aug 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.