Effect of Water‐Content Variability in Design of Clay Embankments
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 4
Abstract
The effects of the variability of the as‐compacted field water content are examined for a clay of medium to low plasticity. This soil had been studied in great detail earlier, and a large data base of parameters for the field‐compacted soil was available. A hypothetical embankment was examined for a number of in service conditions with respect to the factor of safety of side slopes. Clearly shown is that the range of water content in the embankment at time of compaction is the most important characteristic of the earthwork in design of the cross section. The wider the range of water content the less steep can be the design slope for a given factor of safety. Controlling the water content at time of compaction in a more stringent manner offers potential for cost reductions in embankment construction.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Agrawal, G. (1987). “Improving embankment design and performance with Indiana soils,” thesis presented to Purdue University, at West Lafayette, Indiana, in partial fulfillment for the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering.
2.
Altschaeffl, A. G., Thevanayagam, S., and Agrawal, G. (1987). “Implementation program to improve embankment design and performance with Indiana soils.” FHWA/IN/JHRP‐87/6, 1987, Joint Highway Res. Project, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
3.
Bishop, A. W., and Morgenstern, N. (1960). “Stability coefficients for earth slopes.” Geotechnique, London, England, 10(4), 129–150.
4.
Fredlund, D. G. (1989). “Negative pore‐water pressures in slope stability.” Session II—Invited main lecture.” Proc. South American Symp. on Sliding, Paipa, Colombia, 226–256.
5.
Liang, Y., and Lovell, C. W. (1982). “Strength of field compacted clayey embankments.” FHWA/IN/JHRP‐82/1, Joint Highway Res. Project, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
6.
Lin, P. S., and Lovell, C. W. (1983). “Compressibility of field compacted clay.” Transp. Res. Record 897, Washington, D.C., 51–60.
7.
Parsons, A. W. (1978). “General report: Construction and placement of clay fills.” Clay Fills, Inst. Civ. Engrs., London, U.K., 307–314.
8.
Siegel, R. A. (1975). “Computer analysis of general slope stability problems.” JHRP‐75‐8, 1975, Joint Highway Res. Project, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Ind.
9.
Selig, E. T. (1971). “Unified system for compactor performance specification.” Paper No. 710727, Soc. of Automotive Engrs., 80(4), 2454–2464.
10.
Thevanayagam, S., Agrawal, G., and Altschaeffl, A. G. (1989). “New basis for earthwork specification for clay soil.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 115(11), 1599–1616.
11.
Vaughan, P. R., Hight, D. W., Sodha, V. G., and Walbanke, J. (1978). “Factors controlling the stability of clay fills in Britain.” Clay Fills, Inst. Civ. Engrs., London, U.K., 205–217.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117 • Issue 4 • April 1991
Pages: 673 - 683
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1991
Published in print: Apr 1991
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.