TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 1991

Laboratory Study of Pressuremeter Tests in Clays

Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117, Issue 10

Abstract

A series of strain‐controlled model pressuremeter tests were performed in cohesive soils inside a calibration chamber. Stress disturbance was introduced by unloading or preloading surrounding soil prior to the pressuremeter expansion. Pressuremeter tests with variable strain rates were also performed without the stress disturbance. The chamber testing technique enabled these tests to be conducted under highly controlled and repeatable conditions. Comparisons were made with K0‐triaxial and oedometer test results of the same clays. The study shows that the initial shear modulus and undrained shear strength are sensitive to both strain rates and soil disturbance. The influence of these two factors depends on the stress history of the soil and mode of stress disturbance. This paper describes the results of the chamber pressuremeter tests and discusses the practical implications of the study.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Anderson, W. F., and Pyrah, I. C. (1986). “Undrained strength and deformation parameters from pressuremeter test results.” The pressuremeter and its marine application: 2nd Int. Symp.: ASTM STP 950, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 324–340.
2.
Baguelin, F., Jezequel, J.‐F., LeMee, E., and LeMehaute, A. (1972). “Expansion of cylindrical probes in cohesive soils.” J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(11), 1129–1142.
3.
Baguelin, F., Jezequel, J. F., and Shields, D. H. (1978). The pressuremeter and foundation engineering, Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal, Germany, 30–43.
4.
Battaglio, M., Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M., and Lancellotta, R. (1981). “Interpretation of self‐boring pressuremeter tests in clays.” Proc., 10th Int. Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Stockholm, Sweden, Vol. 2, 433–438.
5.
Benoit, J., and Clough, G. W. (1986). “Self‐boring pressuremeter tests in soft clay.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(1), 60–78.
6.
Bjerrum, L., and Anderson, K. H. (1972). “In‐situ measurement of lateral pressures in clay.” Proc. 5th European Conf. on Soil Mech. and Found. Engrg., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Vol. 1, 11–20.
7.
Borsetto, M., Imperato, L., Nova, R., and Peano, A. (1983). “Effect of pressuremeter of finite length in soft clay.” Int. Symp. on Soil and Rock Investigation by In Situ Testing, A. A. Balkema, The Netherlands, 211–215.
8.
Bozozuk, M., and Leonards, G. A. (1972). “The Gloucester test fill.” ASCE Specialty Conf. on Performance of Earth and Earth‐Supported Struct., ASCE, New York, N.Y., 299–317.
9.
Campanella, R. G., and Vaid, Y. P. (1972). “A simple K0 triaxial cell.” Canadian Geotech. J., 9(2), 249–260.
10.
Denby, G. M. (1978). “Self‐boring pressuremeter study of the San Francisco bay mud,” thesis presented to Stanford University, at Stanford, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
11.
Eden, W. J., and Law, K. T. (1980). “Comparison of undrained shear strength results obtained by different test methods in soft clays.” Canadian Geotech. J., 17(3), 369–381.
12.
Gangopadhyay, C. R., and Nasr, A. N. (1986). “Interpretation of pressuremeter tests using simulated tests.” ASTM Special Tech. Publication 950, ASTM, Philadelphia, Pa., 214–231.
13.
Ghionna, V., Jamiolkowski, M., Lacasse, S., Ladd, C. C., Lancellotta, R., and Lunne, T. (1983). “Evaluation of self‐boring pressuremeter.” Int. Symp. on Soil and Rock Investigation by In Situ Testing, A. A. Balkema, Netherlands, 293–301.
14.
Gibson, R. E., and Anderson, W. F. (1961). “In‐situ measurement of soil properties with the pressuremeter.” Civ. Engrg. and Public Works Review, 56(568), 615–618.
15.
Holtz, R. D., and Kovacs, W. D. (1981). An introduction to geotechnical engineering, Prentice‐Hall, Inc., Edgecliff, N.J.
16.
Huang, A. B. (1986). “Laboratory pressuremeter experiments in clay soils,” thesis, presented to Purdue Univesity, at West Lafayette, Ind., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
17.
Huang, A. B., Chameau, J. L., and Holtz, R. D. (1986). “Interpretation of pressuremeter data in cohesive soils by simplex algorithm.” Geotechnique, London, England, 36(4), 599–604.
18.
Huang, A. B., and Haefele, K. C. (1988). “A push‐in pressuremeter/sampler.” Proc. ISOPT‐I, A. A. Balkema, The Netherlands, 533–538.
19.
Huang, A.‐B., Holtz, R. D., and Chameau, J.‐L. (1988). “A calibration chamber for cohesive soils.” Geotech. Testing J., 11(1), 30–35.
20.
Huang, A. B., Holtz, R. D., and Chameau, J. L. (1990). “Pressuremeter holding tests in a calibration chamber.” Pressuremeters: Proc., 3rd Int. Symp. on Pressuremeters, Thomas Telford, London, 253–262.
21.
Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R., Pasqualini, E., and Marchetti, S. (1979). “Design parameters for soft clays.” Proc., VII ECSMFE, Thomas Telford, London, England.
22.
Krizek, R. J., and Sheeran, D. E. (1970). “Slurry preparation and characteristics of samples consolidated in the slurry consolidometer.” Tech. Report No. 2, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1–5.
23.
Lacasse, S., Jamiolkowski, M., Lancellotta, R., and Lunne, T. (1981). “In situ characteristics of two Norwegian clays.” Proc., XICSMFE, Vol. 2, A. A. Balkema, The Netherlands.
24.
Ladanyi, B. (1972). “In situ determination of undrained stress‐strain behavior of sensitive clays with the pressuremeter.” Canadian Geotech. J., 9(3), 313–319.
25.
Ladd, C. C., Germaine, J. T., Baligh, M. M., and Lacasse, S. M. (1979). “Evaluation of self‐boring pressuremeter tests in sensitive clays.” Res. Report R79‐A, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
26.
Ladd, C. C., Germaine, J. T., Baligh, M. M., and Lacasse, S. M. (1980). “Evaluation of self‐boring pressuremeter tests in Boston blue clays.” Report No. FHWA/RD‐80/052, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
27.
Lukas, R. G., and De Bussy, B. L. (1976). “Pressuremeter and laboratory test correlations for clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 102(9), 945–963.
28.
Menard, L. (1956). “An apparatus for measuring the strength of soils in place,” thesis presented to the University of Illinois, at Urbana Ill., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
29.
Nakase, A., and Kamei, T. (1983). “Undrained shear strength anisotropic of normally consolidated cohesive soils.” Soils and Foundations, Tokyo, Japan, 23(1), 91–101.
30.
Palmer, A. C. (1972). “Undrained plane strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clay: A simple interpretation of the pressuremeter test.” Geotechnique, London, England, 22(3), 451–457.
31.
Parry, R. A. G., and Nadarajah, V. (1973). “Observations on laboratory prepared, lightly overconsolidated specimens of kaolin,” Geotechnique, London, England, 24(3), 345–358.
32.
Prevost, J. H. (1979). “Undrained shear tests on clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 105 (1), 49–64.
33.
Prevost, J. H., and Hoeg, K. (1975). “Analysis of pressuremeter in strain softening soil.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 101(8), 717–732.
34.
Wood, D. M., and Wroth, C. P. (1977). “Some laboratory experiments related to the results of pressuremeter tests.” Geotechnique, London, England, 27 (2), 181–201.
35.
Wroth, C. P. (1984). “The interpretation of in situ soil tests.” Geotechnique, London, England, 34(4), 449–489.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 117Issue 10October 1991
Pages: 1549 - 1567

History

Published online: Oct 1, 1991
Published in print: Oct 1991

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

A. B. Huang
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, NY 13676
R. D. Holtz
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
J. L. Chameau, Members, ASCE
Prof., School of Civ. Engrg., Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share