Strain Compatibility Design Method for Reinforced Earth Walls
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 115, Issue 4
Abstract
The methods currently used for the design of reinforced earth walls with quasi‐inextensible metallic reinforcements are essentially based either upon the limit stress analysis concept or empirical relationships derived from observations on full scale structures. The development of an adequate working stress design method for these structures requires a fundamental understanding of the reinforcement effect on the load‐deformation behavior of the soil and a rational, yet relatively simple, load transfer model to simulate the soil‐reinforcement interaction. Furthermore, the response of the composite‐reinforced soil material to loading is highly dependent upon the initial state of stress and strain in the soil, and therefore the construction process and soil compaction can significantly affect the structure behavior under the expected working loads. A strain compatibility design approach which is fundamentally based on the analogy between the plane strain shear mechanism which develops along a potential failure surface in the actual structure and the response of the reinforced soil material to direct shearing is presented. The soil‐reinforcement load transfer model used in this analysis allows for the evaluation of the effect of soil dilatancy and extensibility of the reinforcement on the generated tension forces and on the probable location of the potential failure surface. In order to verify the model/design assumptions, numerical simulations of the construction process are compared with at‐failure observations on reduced scale laboratory model walls as well as with tension forces measured in reinforcements of both reduced scale model walls and full scale structures.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bolton, N. D., Choudhury, S. P., and Pang, P. L. (1977). “Modeling reinforced earth.” Proc. Symp. on Reinforced Earth and Other Composite Soil Techniques, Edinburgh (Sept.), Suppl. Rep. No. 457, Transportation and Road Res. Lab., United Kingdom.
2.
Broms, B. B. (1977). “Polyester fabric as reinforcement in soil.” Proc. Int. Conf. on Use of Fabrics in Geotechnics, Vol. 1, 129–135.
3.
Dyer, N. R., and Milligan, G. W. E. (1984). “A photoelastic investigation of the interaction of a cohesionless soil with reinforcement placed at different orientations.” Proc. Int. Conf. on Insitu Soil and Rock, Reinforcement, Session 2, 257–262.
4.
Gray, D. H., and Ohashi, H. (1983). “Mechanics of fiber reinforcement in sand.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 109(3), 335–353.
5.
Gray, D. H., and Al Refeai, T. (1986). “Behavior of fabric‐versus fiber‐reinforced sand.” J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(8), 804–820.
6.
Hansen, B. (1958). “Line ruptures regarded as narrow rupture zones.” C. R. Conf. sur les problemes de poussees des terres, Bruxelles, I, 39–49.
7.
Jewell, R. A. (1980). “Some effects of reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of soils,” thesis presented to the University of Cambridge, England, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
8.
Juran, I., and Schlosser, F. (1978). “Theoretical analysis of failure in Reinforced Earth structures.” Proc. ASCE Symp. on Earth Reinforcement, Pittsburgh, Apr. 27, 528–555.
9.
Juran, I., Beech, J., and Delaure, E. (1984). “Etude experimentale sur modeles reduits du comportement d'un soutenement en sol doue.” Proc. Int. Conf. on In‐Situ Soil and Rock Reinforcement, 9–11, ENPC, Paris, France.
10.
Juran, I., et al. (1988). “Numerical analysis of the response of reinforced soils to direct shearing: Part II” Int. J. Num. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 12(2).
11.
Long, N. T., Guegan, Y., and Legeay, G. (1972). “Etude de la terre armee a l'appareil triaxial.” Rapport de Recherche No. 17, LCPC.
12.
McGown, A., and Andrawes, K. Z. (1977). “The influence of non‐woven fabric inclusion properties on the stress strain behavior of a soil mass.” Proc., Int. Conf. on Use of Fabrics in Geotechnics, Vol. 1, 161–165.
13.
McGown, A., Andrawes, K. Z., and Al Hasani, M. M. (1978). “Effect of inclusion properties on the behavior of sand.” Geotechnique, No. 3.
14.
Schlosser, F., and Segrestin, P. (1979). “Dimensinnement des ouvrages en terre armee par la methode de l'equilibre local.” Int. Conf. on Soil Reinforcement: Reinforced Earth and Other Techniques, Paris, Mar.
15.
Yang, Z. (1973). “Strength and deformation characteristics of reinforced sand,” thesis presented to the University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Apr 1, 1989
Published in print: Apr 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.