Centrifuge Evaluation of Numerical Model for Clay
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 114, Issue 3
Abstract
A numerical model that considers both hydrodynamic consolidation and creep behavior of soft clays has been evaluated on the basis of a comparison between numerical predictions and centrifuge test results. The constitutive relationships and the centrifuge testing results are described. The comparisons between predictions and measured values show that the numerical model is capable of predicting the time‐dependent pore pressure and deformation responses of foundation clays subjected to embankment loadings. The discrepancy between predicted immediate undrained response and measured values is explained by the effect of the stiffer undrained compression response inherent in the modified Cam‐clay model.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Arulanandan, K., Shen, C. K., and Young, R. B. (1971). “Undrained creep behavior of a coastal organic silty clay.” Geotechnique, 21(4), 359–375.
2.
Bjerrum, L. (1967). “Engineering geology of normally consolidated marine clays as related to settlements of buildings.” (Seventh Rankine Lecture), Geotechnique, 17(2), 82–118.
3.
Bonaparte, R. (1981). “A time‐dependent constitutive model for cohesive soils,” thesis presented to the University of California, at Berkeley, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
4.
Borja, R. I. (1984). “Finite element analysis of the time‐dependent behavior of soft clays,” thesis presented to Stanford University, at Stanford, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
5.
Borja, R. I., and Kavazanjian, E., Jr. (1985). “A constitutive model for the stress‐strain‐time behavior of ‘wet’ clays.” Geotechnique, 35(3), 283–298.
6.
Carter, J. P., Booker, J. R., and Small, J. C. (1979). “The analysis of finite elasto‐plastic consolidation.” Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech., 3, 107–129.
7.
Chang, C.‐S., and Duncan, J. M. (1977). “Analysis of consolidation of earth and rockfill dams.” Geotechnical engineering report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
8.
Craig, W. H. (1984). “The centrifuge as an aid to the designer.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Recent Advance in Geotechnical Centrifuge Modeling, University of California, Davis, Calif., 26–29.
9.
Dafalias, Y. F., and Herrmann, L. R. (1980). “A generalized bounding surface constitutive model for clays.” Proceedings of the Symposium on Limit Equilibrium, Plasticity and Generalized Stress‐Strain Applications in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 78–95, Hollywood, Fla.
10.
Holzer, T. L., Hoeg, K., and Arulanandan, K. (1973). “Excess pore pressures during undrained clay creep.” Can. Geotech. J., 10(12), 12–24.
11.
Kavazanjian, E., Jr. “A generalized approach to the prediction of the stressstrain‐time behavior of soft clay.” thesis, presented to the University of California, at Berkeley, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
12.
Kavazanjian, E., Jr., Borja, R. I., and Jong, H. L. (1985). “Time‐dependent deformations in clay soils,” 11th International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 2, 1985, pp. 535–538.
13.
Kavazanjian, E., Jr., and Mitchell, J. K. (1977). “A general stressstrain‐time formulation for soils.” Proc. Specialty Session No. 9, Ninth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 113–120, Tokyo, Japan.
14.
Kavazanjian, E., Jr., and Mitchell, J. K. (1980). “Time‐dependent deformation behavior of clays.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 106(GT6), 611–630.
15.
Liang, R. Y. K. (1985). “Evaluation of a constitutive model using the centrifuge,” thesis presented to the University of California, at Berkeley, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
16.
Lo, K. Y. (1969). “The pore pressure‐strain relationship of normally consolidated undisturbed clays, Part I. theoretical considerations.” Can. Geotech. J., 7(4), 383–394.
17.
Mitchell, J. K., and Liang, R. Y. K. (1986). “Centrifuge evaluation of a time‐dependent numerical model for soft clay deformations.” Consolidations of soils: testing and evaluation, ASTM STP 892, R. N. Young and F. C. Townsend, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials. Philadelphia, Pa., 567–592.
18.
Roscoe, K. H., and Burland, J. B. (1968). “On the generalized stress‐strain behavior of ‘wet’ clay.” Engineering plasticity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 535–609.
19.
Singh, A., and Mitchell, J. K. (1968). “Generalized stress‐strain‐time function for soils.” J. Soil Mech. Foundations Div., ASCE, 94(SM1), 21–46.
20.
Tavenas, F., and Leroueil, S. (1980). “The behavior of Embankments on clay foundations.” Can. Geotech. J., 17(2), 236–260.
21.
Tse, E. C. (1985). “Influence of structure change on pore pressure and deformational behavior of soft clays under surface loadings,” thesis presented to the University of California, Berkeley, Calif., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 114 • Issue 3 • March 1988
Pages: 265 - 283
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1988
Published in print: Mar 1988
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.