Comparison of Natural and Remolded Plastic Clay
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 7
Abstract
Tests have been performed on triaxial samples of natural and remolded plastic clay from Winnipeg, Canada, to examine the way natural samples conform with modern conceptual models of soil behavior based largely on remolded samples. The clay contains mixed illites and montmorillonites. In its field condition, it is layered, fissured, overconsolidated, and contains many inclusions. Natural samples were carefully trimmed from blocks of the clay: Remolded samples were reconsolidated from a slurry. All reconsolidation was onedimensional. Normal consolidation and critical state lines for the two sets of samples were parallel, with natural values at higher specific volumes than remolded samples. Post‐yield compressibilities and pore‐water pressures were somewhat higher in natural samples, but strengths and moduli were lower. Yield stresses were similar, but the natural yields were again at higher specific volumes. Geotechnical and geological evidence suggests that the natural clay is cemented. Many fundamental features of critical state soil mechanics were found in the natural samples. Differences were in detail and not in principle.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baracos, A., “Composition and Structural Anisotropy of Winnipeg Soils—A Study Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy and X‐Ray Diffraction Analysis,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 14, 1977, pp. 125–143.
2.
Baracos, A., Graham, J., Kjartanson, B. H., and Shields, D. H., “Geology and Soil Properties of Winnipeg,” ASCE Symposium on Geologic Environment and Soil Properties, held at Houston, Tex., Oct., 1983, pp. 39–56.
3.
Berre, T., and Bjerrum, L., “Shear Strength of Normally Consolidated Clays,” Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, U.S.S.R., 1973, Vol. 1, pp. 39–49.
4.
Bjerrum, L., “The Engineering Geology of Norwegian Normally Consolidated Marine Clays as Related to the Settlement of Buildings,” Geotechnique, Vol. 17, 1967, pp. 81–118.
5.
Crooks, J. H. A., and Graham, J., “Geotechnical Properties of the Belfast Estuarine Deposits,” Geotechnique, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1976, pp. 293–315.
6.
Graham, J., Pinkney, R. B., Lew, K. V., and Trainor, P. G. S., “Curve‐Fitting and Laboratory Data,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 19, 1982, pp. 201–205.
7.
Graham, J., and Houlsby, G. T., “Anisotropic Elasticity in a Natural Plastic Clay,” Geotechnique, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1983, pp. 165–180.
8.
Graham, J., Crooks, J. H. A., and Bell, A. L., “Time Effects on the Stress‐Strain Behavior of Natural Soft Clays,” Geotechnique, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1983, pp. 327–340.
9.
Grahama, J., Noonan, M. L., and Lew, K. V., ““Yield States and Stress‐Strain Relationships in a Natural Plastic Clay,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 20, 1983, pp. 502–516.
10.
Graham, J., and Au, V. C. S., “Effects of Freeze‐Thaw and Softening on a Natural Clay at Low Stresses,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 22, No. 1, Feb., 1985.
11.
Graham, J., Crooks, J. H. A., and Bell, A. L., closure to “Time Effects on the Stress‐Strain Behavior of Natural Soft Clays,” Geotechnique, Vol. 34, 1984.
12.
Henkel, D. J., “The Shear Strength of Saturated Remoulded Clays,” ASCE Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, held at Boulder, Colo., 1960, pp. 533–554.
13.
Ladd, C. C., and Foott, R., “New Design Procedure for Stability of Soft Clays,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 100, No. GT7, 1974, pp. 763–786.
14.
Landva, A., “Equipment for Cutting and Mounting Undisturbed Specimens of Clay in Testing Devices,” Publication No. 56, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway, 1964, pp. 1–5.
15.
Li, E. C. C., “A Geotechnical Study of Remolded Winnipeg Clay,” thesis presented to the University of Manitoba, at Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, in 1983, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science.
16.
Mesri, G., and Olson, R. E., “Shear Strength of Montmorillonite,” Geotechnique, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1970, pp. 261–270.
17.
Mitchell, R. J., “On the Yielding and Mechanical Strength of Leda Clays,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1970, pp. 297–312.
18.
Parry, R. H. G., “Field and Laboratory Behaviour of a Lightly Overconsolidated Clay,” Geotechnique, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1968, pp. 151–171.
19.
Rivard, P. J., and Lu, Y., “Shear Strength of Soft Fissured Clays,” Canadian Geotechnical journal, Vol. 15, 1978, pp. 382–390.
20.
Teller, J. T., and Thorleifson, L. H., “The Lake Agassiz‐Lake Superior Connection,” Glacial Lake Agassiz, J. I. Teller and L. Clayton, eds., Geological Associations of Canada, 1983, pp. 261–290.
21.
Wroth, C. P., and Houlsby, G. T., “A Critical State Model for Predicting the Behaviour of Clays,” Proceedings of the Workshop on Limit Equilibrium, Plasticity and Generalized Stress‐Strain in Geotechnical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, 1980, pp. 592–627.
22.
Wroth, C. P., Randolph, M. F., Houlsby, G. T., and Fahey, M., “A Review of the Engineering Properties of Soils with Particular Reference to the Shear Modulus,” Internal Report CUED/D‐Soil TR75 (1979), Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, England, 1979, pp. 1–64.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 111 • Issue 7 • July 1985
Pages: 865 - 881
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1985
Published in print: Jul 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.