Stress Anisotropy Effects on Clay Strength
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 111, Issue 3
Abstract
For ease and economy, most commercial laboratories perform consolidated undrained triaxial shear tests using an initial isotropic state of stress. The insitu state of stress for most clay soils, however, is anisotropic. How different are the undrained shear strengths and effective stress friction angles measured under “field conditions” (CAU) as opposed to routine laboratory conditions (CIU)? This study reviews available published data from over 40 different clays consolidated under both isotropic and anisotropic conditions before triaxial shear. Most of these clays were normally‐consolidated, although onethird were also tested at overconsolidated states. Important factors such as strain rates, soil structure, and differences in laboratories were considered to be beyond the scope of this study. For triaxial compression, it is suggested that the anisotropic undrained srength, on the average, may be estimated as 87% of the isotropic strength. Based on few data, a tentative correction factor of 0.60 is recommended for isotropic extension to account for stress anisotropy. The effective stress friction angle appears little affected by initial stress state.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Akai, K., and Adachi, T., “Study on the One‐Dimensional Consolidation and Shear Strength Characteristics of Fully Saturated Clay,” Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Vol. 1, 1965.
2.
Amerasinghe, S. F., and Parry, R. G. H., “Anisotropy in Heavily Overconsolidated Kaolin,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT12, Dec., 1975, pp. 1277–1293.
3.
Berre, T., “Triaxial Testing at the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1/2, Mar./June, 1982, pp. 3–17.
4.
Bozozuk, M., and Leonards, G. A., “The Gloucester Test Fill,” Performance of Earth and Earth‐Support Structures, Purdue University, Lafayette, Ind., Vol. I, June, 1972, pp. 299–317.
5.
Broms, B. B., and Ratnam, M. V., “Shear Strength of an Anisotropically Consolidated Clay,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 89, No. SM6, Nov., 1963, pp. 1–26.
6.
Crooks, J., A Qualitative Stress‐Strain‐Time Model,” Laboratory Shear Strength of Soil, ASTM, STP 740, 1981, pp. 685–698.
7.
D Appolonia, D. J., Lambe, T. W., and Poulos, H. G., “Evaluation of Pore Pressures,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 97, No. SM6, June, 1971, pp. 881–897.
8.
Delory, F. A., and Salvas, R. J., “Some Observations on the Undrained Shearing Strength Used to Analyze a Failure,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, Feb., 1969pp. 97–110.
9.
Donaghe, R. T., and Townsend, F. C., “Effects of Anisotropic versus Isotropic Consolidation in Triaxial Compression Tests of Cohesive Soils,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 1, No. 4, Dec., 1978, pp. 173–189.
10.
Hanzawa, H., “Field and Laboratory Behavior of Khor Al‐Zubair Clay, Iraq,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 17, No. 4, Dec., 1977, pp. 17–30.
11.
Hanzawa, H., “Geotechnical Properties of Normally‐Consolidated Fao Clay,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 17, No. 4, Dec., 1977, pp. 1–15.
12.
Henkel, D. J., and Sowa, V. A., “The Influence of Stress History on Stress Paths,” Laboratory Shear Testing of Soil, ASTM, STP 361, Ottawa, 1963, pp. 288–291.
13.
Khera, R., and Krizek, R., “Strength Behavior of an Anisotropically Consolidated Remolded Clay,” Highway Research Record, National Research Council, No. 190, 1967.
14.
Kinner, E., and Ladd, C. C., “Undrained Bearing Capacity of Footings on Clay,” Proceedings, 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, Moscow, 1973, pp. 209–215.
15.
Koutsoftas, D., “Effect of Cyclic Loads,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 104, No. GT5, May, 1978, pp. 609–620.
16.
Koutsoftas, D. C., discussion to “Cam‐Clay Prediction,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. GT1, Jan., 1982, pp. 178–181.
17.
Ladd, C. C., “Stress‐Strain Modulus of Clay,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 90, No. SM5, Sept., 1964, pp. 127–150.
18.
Ladd, C. C., “Stress‐Strain Behavior of Anisotropically‐Consolidated Clays during Undrained Shear,” Proceedings, 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 1, 1965, Montreal, pp. 282–286.
19.
Ladd, C. C., et al., “Stress‐Deformation and Strength Characteristics,” Proceedings, 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, State‐of‐the‐Art Report, Tokyo, Vol. 2, 1977, pp. 421–494.
20.
Ladd, C. C., “Test Embankment on Sensitive Clay,” Proceedings, Performance of Earth and Earth‐Structures, Purdue University, Vol. 1, June, 1972, pp. 101–128.
21.
Ladd, C. C., et al., “C‐U Plane Strain Shear Tests on Boston Blue Clay,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Contract Report 3‐101 to U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Mar., 1971.
22.
Lee, K., and Morrison, R., “Strength of Anisotropically Consolidated Compacted Clay,” Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol. 96, No. SM6, Nov., 1970, pp. 2025–2043.
23.
Lowe, J., III, and Karafiath, L., “Effect of Anisotropic Consolidation,” Proceedings, Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., June, 1960, pp. 837–853.
24.
Mayne, P. W., “Cam Clay Predictions of Undrained Strength,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 106, No. GT11, Nov., 1980, pp. 1219–1242.
25.
Mayne, P. W., closure to “Cam Clay Predictions,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 108, No. GT2, Feb., 1982, pp. 327‐324.
26.
Mayne, P. W., discussion to “Undrained Shear Strength Anisotropy,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 23, No. 4, Dec., 1983, pp. 509–512.
27.
Mitachi, T., and Kitago, S., “Undrained Triaxial and Plane Strain Behavior,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 20, No. 1, Mar., 1980, pp. 13–28;
and closure, Vol. 21, No. 2, June, 1981, pp. 137–140.
28.
Mitachi, T., and Kitago, S., “Change in Characteristics of a Saturated Remolded Clay Due to Swelling,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 16, No. 1, 1976, Mar., pp. 45–58.
29.
Mitachi, T., and Kitago, S., “The Influence of Stress History of Clay,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 19, No. 2, June, 1979, pp. 45–61.
30.
Nakase, A., and Kamei, T., “Undrained Shear Strength Anisotopy,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 23, No. 1, Mar., 1983, pp. 91–101.
31.
Parry, R. H. G., and Nadarajah, V., “Observation on Laboratory Prepared Specimens of Kaolin,” Geotechnique 24, No. 3, 1973, pp. 345–358.
32.
Ramalho‐Ortigao, J. A., et al., “Embankment Failure on Clay near Rio de Janeiro,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. GT11, Nov., 1983, pp. 1460–1479.
33.
Sanchez, J., et al., “Influence of Stress History on Soft Clays,” Proceedings, 7th European Conference on Soil Mechanics, Brighton, Vol. 1, 1979, pp. 257–261.
34.
Saxena, S., Hedberg, J., and Ladd, C. C., “Geotechnical Properties of Hackensack Valley Varved Clays of New Jersey,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 1, No. 3, Sept., 1978, pp. 148–161.
35.
Simons, N. E., “Effect of Overconsolidation on the Shear Strength Characteristics of an Undisturbed Oslo Clay,” Proceedings, Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., 1960, pp. 747–763.
36.
Vaid, Y., and Campanella, R., “Triaxial and Plane Strain Behavior,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 100, No. GT3, Mar., 1974, pp. 207–224.
37.
Whitman, R. V., Ladd, C. C., and daCruz, P., discussion to Session 3, Proceedings, ASCE, Research Conference on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, Boulder, Colo., June, 1960, pp. 1049–1056.
38.
Yasuhara, K., et al., “Cyclic Strength and Deformation of Normally Consolidated Clay,” Soils and Foundations, Vol. 22, No. 3, Sept., 1982, pp. 77–91.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 111 • Issue 3 • March 1985
Pages: 356 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 ASCE.
History
Published online: Mar 1, 1985
Published in print: Mar 1985
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.