Stability of Ekofisk Tank: Reliability Analysis
Publication: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 110, Issue 7
Abstract
The uncertainties encountered in the stability analysis for the foundation of the Ekofisk Tank are formulated in probabilistic terms and used to evaluate the reliability of the foundation design. The major sources of uncertainty are: shear strength of the soil, wave loads, porepressure generation under repeated loads, and methods of analysis. The results show that the conservative assumptions and low safety factor, based on the information available at the time of design, lead to a reliability that is close to those reported for other offshore foundations in the North Sea. About the same reliability is obtained by an estimate made on the basis of current knowledge. This study demonstrates the use of reliability analysis in designs involving complex loadings and inadequate knowledge on soil behavior. The procedures are comparatively simple and may be applied to new designs to help the engineer in making decisions about safety factors.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Andersen, K. H., “Behavior of Clay Subjected to Undrained Cyclic Loading,” Behavior of Off‐Shore Structures, Vol. 1, pp. 392–403.
2.
Andersen, K. H., and Moussa, A. A., “Cyclic Loading Simple Shear Tests on Sand,” Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Internal Report 51505‐1, Oslo, Norway, 1973.
3.
Andersen, A., et al., “Procedures used to obtain soil parameters for foundation engineering in the North Sea,” Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Publ. 129, 1973.
4.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., Probability, Statistics and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw‐Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., 1970.
5.
Bjerrum, L., “Geotechnical problems involved in foundations of structures in the North Sea,” Geotechnique, Vol. 23, No. 3, 1973, pp. 319–358.
6.
Clausen, C. F. J., et al., “Observed Behavior of the Ekofisk Oil Storage Tank Foundation,” Proceedings of the 7th Offshore Technology Conference, Vol. 3, pp. 399–413; Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Publication No. 108, Oslo, Norway.
7.
Eide, O., “Marine Soil Mechanics,” Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Publ. 103, Oslo, Norway, 1974.
8.
Goodknight, R. C., and Russell, T. L., “Investigation of the Statistics of Wave Heights,” Journal of the Waterworks Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 89, No. WW2, 1963, pp. 29–54.
9.
Hoeg, K., “Foundation Engineering for Fixed Offshore Structures, State of Art,” Proceedings of the International Conference on the Behavior of Offshore Structures, Vol. 1, 1976, pp. 39–69;
also Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Publication No. 114, Oslo, Norway.
10.
Hoeg, K., and Tang, W. H., “Probabilistic considerations in the foundation engineering for offshore structures,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, 2, Munich, 1977, pp. 267–296.
11.
Lauritzsen, R., and Schjetne, K., “Stability Calculations for Offshore Gravity Structures,” Proceedings of the 8th Offshore Technology Conference, Vol. 1, 1976, pp. 75–82; also Norwegian Geotechnical Institute Publication 113, Oslo, Norway.
12.
Lee, K. L., and Focht, J. A., “Liquefaction Potential at Ekofisk Tank in North Sea,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No. GT1, 1975, pp. 1–18.
13.
Longuet‐Higgins, M. S., “On the Statistical Distribution of the Heights of Sea Waves,” Journal of Marine Research, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1952, pp. 245–266.
14.
Marion, H. A., “Ekofisk Storage Tank,” Proceedings, Symposium on Ocean Engineering, Teddington, pp. 83–94.
15.
Raiffa, H., and Schlaifer, R., “Applied Statistical Decision Theory,” Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University, Boston, Mass., 1961.
16.
Rahmen, M. S., Seed, H. B., and Booker, F. R., “Pore Pressure Developed under Offshore Gravity Structures,” Journal of the Geotechnial Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 103, No. GT12, pp. 1419–1436.
17.
Saetre, H. J., “On High Wave Conditions in the Northern North Sea,” presented at the Oceanology International Conference, held at Brighton, 1975, pp. 280–289.
18.
Schmertmann, J. H., “Measurement of In‐Situ Shear Strength,” presented at the 1975 ASCE Conference on In‐Situ Measurement of Soil Properties, held at Raleigh, N.C., Proceedings, ASCE, Vol. 2, pp. 57–138.
19.
Schmertmann, J. H., “An Updated Correlation between Relative Density and Fugro‐Type Electric Cone Bearing, ” Contract Report DACW 39‐76‐M 6646, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1976.
20.
Seed, H. B., et al., “Considerations in Undisturbed Sampling of Sands,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 108, No. GT2, pp. 265–283.
21.
Smits, F. P., Andersen, K. H., and Gudehus, G., “Pore Pressure Generation,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Soil Mechanics Research and Design for Oosterschelde Storm Surge Barrier, also Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Publication No. 125, 1978, Oslo, Norway.
22.
Tang, W. H., Michols, K. A., and Kjekstad, O., “Probabilistic Stability Analysis of Gravity Platforms,” International Conference on Structural Safety and Reliability, 3, Trondheim, 1981.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
Volume 110 • Issue 7 • July 1984
Pages: 938 - 956
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1984
Published in print: Jul 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.