Introduction to Structural Failure Modes for Nuclear Power Facilities
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 119, Issue 2
Abstract
This introduction provides a background of the evaluation methods for earthquakes larger than design basis. Seismic probabilistic risk assessment (SPRA) and seismic margin assessment (SMA) methods are introduced to the reader. The basic parameters used to define seismic capacity for each method are explained. The objectives of both evaluation methods and how they can be used to evaluate the adequacy of a seismic design are discussed. General issues related to computing seismic capacity are reviewed relative to SPRA and SMA. Four companion papers presented in the journal following this introduction discuss the types of information (i.e., dynamic tests, earthquake experience, and analytical data) that are used to determine the real capacity of structures and equipment in nuclear power plants to resist earthquakes. The motivation for discussing these three types of information is presented as an introduction to these papers that follow in this journal edition. The purpose of the present paper is to lay the groundwork and provide motivation for these papers.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Budnitz, R. J., Amico, P. J., Cornell, C. A., Hall, W. J., Kennedy, R. P., Reed, J. W., and Shinozuka, M. (1985). “An approach to the quantification of seismic margins in nuclear power plants.” NUREG/CR‐4334, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Bethesda, Md.
2.
Czarnecki, R. M., Manrique, M. A., and Samaddar, S. K. (1993). “Expansion anchor capacity.” J. Energy Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 139–158.
3.
Farrar, C. R., Reed, J. W., and Salmon, M. W. (1993). “Low‐rise shear wall failure modes.” J. Energy Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 119–138.
4.
Hashimoto, P., and Basak, A. K. (1993). “Failure modes for flat‐bottom tanks.” J. Energy Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 82–100.
5.
Kennedy, R. P., Wesley, D. A., and Tong, W. H. (1988). “Probabilistic evaluation of the Diablo Canyon turbine building seismic capacity using nonlinear time history analyses.” Rep. No. 1643.1, Pacific Gas and Electric Co., San Francisco, Calif.
6.
“A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin.” (1991). NP‐6041, Rev. 1, Electric Power Research Inst., Palo Alto, Calif.
7.
“PRA Procedures Guide.” (1981). NUREG/CR‐2300, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
8.
Tang, H. T., Hossain, Q. A., and Ravindra, M. K. (1933). “Containment capacity and failure modes for conditions beyond design basis.” J. Energy Engrg., ASCE, 119(2), 100–118.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Received: Jun 12, 1992
Published online: Aug 1, 1993
Published in print: Aug 1993
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.