Historical Trends in Energy Risk Comparisons
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 3
Abstract
A historical review of comparisons of risks from various energy and electricity technologies indicates a changing focus over time. Studies published in the 1970s addressed health and safety risks to the public and to workers from a power plant of standard size and design, assumed to be located at a generic site. Beginning in the late 1970s, more systematic studies were conducted that considered how additions of new generating capacity affected an entire generating system. More recent studies have considered risks not appropriately accounted for on a per‐power‐plant basis including those from energy end use, where, for example, risks from electrical shock or fire are independent of the technology used for generation, and global risks where the marginal framework inherent in a per‐power‐plant analysis fails to capture the key aspects of the risks (for example, greenhouse gas emissions). These studies have not been particularly influential in energy technology choices in particular cases; they have contributed to the public debate on the desirability of alternative technologies based on their health and environmental risks.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Accident Facts. (1981). National Safety Council, Chicago, Ill.
2.
Accident Facts. (1984). National Safety Council, Chicago, Ill.
3.
“Changing climate.” (1983). Report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee. Nat. Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
4.
Cohen, A., and Pritchard, D. (1980). “Comparative risks of electricity production systems: A critical survey of the literature.” Executive Research Paper 11, U.K. Health and Safety, London, England, Dec.
5.
“Comparative risk‐cost‐benefit study of alternative sources of electrical energy.” (1974). WASH‐1224, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington, D.C.
6.
Energy in transition: 1985‐2010. (1979). Nat. Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
7.
Gaines, L., Berry, R. S., and Long, T. V. (1979). TOSCA: The total social costs of coal and nuclear power. Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Gast, P. (1973). “Divergent public attitudes toward nuclear and hydroelectric plant safety,” presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the American Nuclear Society, Chicago, Ill., Jun.
9.
Hamilton, L. D. (1981). “Comparative risk assessment in the energy industry.” Health risk analysis. C. Richmond, P. Walsh, and E. Copenhaver, eds., Franklin Inst. Press, Philadelphia, Pa.
10.
Humphreys, C. E. (1964). Physics of the air. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, N.Y.
11.
Inhaber, H. (1978). Risk of energy production. Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Canada.
12.
Levenson, M., and Rahn, F. (1981). “Realistic estimates of the consequences of nuclear accidents.” Nuclear Tech., 53(2), 99–110.
13.
Petty, P. N., and Hopp, W. J. (1982). “A comparative risk analysis of fuelwood use in the pacific northwest.” Energy, 7(4), 359–365.
14.
Policy options for stabilizing global climate. (1989). U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
15.
The potential effects of climate change on the United States. (1989). U.S. Envir. Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
16.
Ramsey, W. (1979). Unpaid costs of electrical energy: Health and environmental impacts from coal and nuclear power. The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md.
17.
“Reactor safety study.” (1975). WASH‐1400, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
18.
“Report to the American physical society of the study group on radionuclide release from severe accidents at nuclear power plants.” (1985). Reviews of modern physics, American Physical Soc., New York, N.Y.
19.
Rosenberg, N. J., Easterling, W. E., Crosson, P. E., and Darmstadter, J., eds. (1989). Greenhouse warming: Abatement and adaptation, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
20.
“Severe accident risks: An assessment for five U.S. nuclear power plants.” (1989). NUREG‐1150, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Res., Washington, D.C.
21.
Starr, C., Schurr, S., Esselman, W. and Whipple, C. (1983). “Economic and social aspects of electricity use.” Proc. U.S. Nat. Committee, 12th Congress of the World Energy Conf., World Energy Congress, New Delhi, India, Sep.
22.
Starr, C., and Whipple, C. (1982). “Coping with nuclear power risks, the electric utility incentives.” Nuclear Safety, 23(1), 1–7.
23.
Travis, C. C., Etnier, E. L., and Meyer, H. R. (1985). “Health risks of residential wood heat.” Envir. Mgmt., 9(3), 209–216.
24.
Watson, A. P., and Etnier, E. L. (1981). “Health and safety implications of alternative energy technologies. I. Geothermal and biomass.” Envir. Mgmt., 5(4), 313–327.
25.
Whipple, C. (1981). “Energy production risks: What perspective should we take?.” Risk Analysis, 1(1), 29–46.
26.
Whipple, C. (1988). “Comparative risks of energy production.” Information Needs for Risk Management, Fowle, C. D., Grima, A. P. and Munn, R. E., eds., Inst. for Envir. Studies, Univ. of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
27.
Wildavsky, A. (1980). “Richer is safer.” The Public Interest, 60, 23–29.
28.
Wilson, R. (1979). “The environmental and health consequences of replacement electricity supply.” Energy, 4, 81–86.
29.
Wilson, R., Colome, S. D., Spengler, J. D., and Wilson, D. G. (1980). Health effects of fossil fuel burning: Assessment and mitigation, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 3 • December 1990
Pages: 163 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1990
Published in print: Dec 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.