Health‐Risk Assessment: Production of Electricity
Publication: Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 116, Issue 3
Abstract
The central focus of the paper is to develop the technical bases for intertechnology comparisons based on health risks. To achieve this objective, the paper unifies deterministic and probabilistic aspects of energy‐related health‐risk assessment. The first section of the paper discusses the measures of risk assessment used in making comparisons among different technologies that generate electricity. Beginning with such risk measures as the constant slope and zero intercept hypothesis, the discussion progresses through risk scaling, summation, and other measures. The shortcomings and advantages of each measure are discussed and illustrated. The second section of the paper introduces and discusses the basis for probabilistic risk assessment through frequency‐severity models and hazard functions. The third section provides a summary of intertechnology comparisons and discusses their usefulness for the decision maker. This section includes technology comparisons based on confidence tables as a means to represent the degree of confidence in the estimates of risk between and among technologies. Conclusions complete the paper.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Barlow, R. E., and Proschan, F. (1965). Mathematical theory of reliability, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
2.
Bhat, U. N. (1982). Elements of applied stochastic processes, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
3.
Cohen, A. V., and Pritchard, D. K. (1980). “Comparative risks of electricity production systems: A critical survey of the literature.” Research Paper 11, Health and Safety Executive, London, U.K.
4.
Comar, C. L., and Sagan, L. A. (1976). “Health effects of energy production and conversion.” Annual Review of Energy, 1, 581–599.
5.
Comparative risk‐cost‐benefit study of alternative sources of electrical energy. (1973). Washington, D.C.
6.
Cox, L. A. (1987). “Statistical issues in the estimation of assigned shares for carcinogenesis liability.” Risk Analysis, 7(1), 71–78.
7.
Cox, L. A., Fiksel, J., Kalelhar, A. S., and Ricci, P. F. (1983). “Occupational risks of energy production.” Nuclear Safety, 24, 459–470.
8.
Drake, A. W. (1967). Fundamentals of applied probability theory. McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y.
9.
Energy and the environment: Electric power. (1973). U.S. Council of Envir. Quality, Washington, D.C.
10.
Ferguson, R. A. D. (1981). Comparative risks of electricity generating fuel systems in the U.K. Peter Peregrinus Publisher, Stevenage, U.K.
11.
Griffiths, R. F. (1981). “Problems in the use of risk criteria.” Dealing with risk, John Wiley and Sons, New York, N.Y.
12.
Hamilton, L. D. (1975). “Energy and Health,” Proc. of the Connecticut Conference on Energy, Brookhaven National Laboratory.
13.
Hamilton, L. D. (1980). “Comparative risks from different energy systems: Evolution of methods of studies.” International Atomic Energy Agency Bulletin, 22(5/6), 37–48.
14.
“Health evaluation of energy generating sources.” (1978). J. American Medical Assoc., 240, 2193–2195.
15.
Holdren, J. P., Morris, G., and Mintzer, I. (1980). “Environmental aspects of renewable energy sources.” Annual Review of Energy, 5(1), 241–291.
16.
House, P. W., Coleman, J. A., Shull, R. D., Matheny, R. W., and Hock, J. C. (1981). “Comparing energy technology alternatives from an environmental perspective.” DOE/EV‐0109, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.
17.
Kaplan, S. and Garrick, B. J. (1981). “On the quantitative definition of risk.” Risk Analysis, 1, 11–27.
18.
Kaplan, S., Perla, H. F., and Bley, D. C. (1983). “A methodology for seismic risk analysis of nuclear power plants.” Risk Analysis, 3, 169–180.
19.
Keeney, R. L. (1980). “Equity and public risks.” Operations Res., 28, 527–535.
20.
Morris, S. C., Novak, K. M., and Hamilton, L. D. (1979a). Databookfor the quantification of health effects from coal energy systems, Brookhaven Nat. Lab., Upton, N.Y.
21.
Morris, S. C., Novak, K. M., and Hamilton, L. D. (1979b). “Health effects of coal in the national energy plan” BNL 51043, Brookhaven Nat. Lab., Upton, N.Y.
22.
Parzen, E. (1962). Stochastic processes, Holden‐Day, San Francisco, Calif.
23.
Ramsey, W. (1979). Unpaid costs of electrical energy: Health and environmental impacts from coal and nuclear. John Hopkins Univ. Press for Resour. for the Future, Baltimore, Md.
24.
Reactor Safety Study. (1975). Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C.
25.
Ricci, P. F., Crouch, E. C., and Cirillo, M. C. (1985). “Technological risk assessment: Measures and methods.” Principles of health risk assessment, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
26.
Ricci, P. F., and Molton, L. (1981). “Risk‐benefit in environmental law.” Sci., 214, 1096–1100.
27.
Risk assessment: A study group report. (1983). The Royal Soc., London, U.K.
28.
Risk and decision making: Perspective and research. (1982). Nat. Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
29.
Rose, D., Walsh, P., and Leskovian, L. (1976). “Nuclear power—Compared to what?.” American Sci., 61, 291.
30.
Sagan, L. A. (1974). “Health costs associated with the mining, transport, and combustion of coal in the steam‐electric industry.” Nature, 250, 107–111.
31.
Social costs for alternative means of electrical power generation for 1980 and 1990. (1973). Argonne National Lab., Springfield, Va.
32.
Wu‐Chien, J. S., and Apostolakis, G. (1983). “Prospect theory and limit lines,” Risk Analysis, 3(5), 181–188.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Energy Engineering
Volume 116 • Issue 3 • December 1990
Pages: 130 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 ASCE.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1990
Published in print: Dec 1990
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.