Effect of Block Size and Joint Geometry on Jointed Rock Hydraulics and REV
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 126, Issue 8
Abstract
The effect of joint geometry parameters and the size of jointed rock block on the hydraulic properties of jointed rock, including the equivalent continuum behavior, was investigated through numerical experimentation. The chance to reach equivalent continuum behavior for a rock mass having a certain joint configuration increases with the increase of block size. The REV (representative elementary volume) size to show hydraulic equivalent continuum behavior for a jointed rock system was found to depend on the orientation of the joint sets; the REV size seems to decrease with increasing joint density and joint size. The REV does not seem to exist for some rock masses having joint systems with low relative orientation angles (systems with two joint sets) and low densities. The average block permeability (K0) value at the REV size for a joint system increases with increase in joint size and joint density. The equivalent continuum behavior of a joint system can be expressed with respect to a cut-off value for the first invariant of fracture tensor (F0). The block size corresponding to the aforementioned cut-off F0 (between 10 and 30 for the joint systems investigated in this study) can be considered to provide the REV size for a given joint configuration. A threshold value for F0 (a joint network having two perpendicular joint sets produced 2.75) can be used to find the chance for a given joint network to have nonzero block permeability. A strong power functional relation seems to exist between the directional permeability and the fracture tensor component for the connected joint configuration when rock blocks contain minor discontinuities.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Andersson, J., and Dverstorp, B. (1987). “Conditional simulations of fluid flow in three-dimensional network of discrete fractures.” Water Resour. Res., 23(10), 1876–1886.
2.
Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of fluids in porous media, Elsevier Science, New York.
3.
Cacus, M. C., et al. (1990). “Modeling of fracture flow with a stochastic discrete fracture network: Calibration and validation—1. The flow model.” Water Resour. Res., 26(3), 479–489.
4.
Hsieh, P. A., and Neuman, S. P. (1985). “Field determination of the three dimensional hydraulic conductivity tensor of anisotropic media—1. Theory.” Water Resour. Res., 21(11), 1655–1665.
5.
Kanatani, K. (1984). “Distribution of directional data and fabric tensors.” Int. J. Engrg. Sci., 22(2), 149–164.
6.
Kulatilake, P. H. S. W., Wathugala, D. N., and Stephansson, O. (1993). “Joint network modeling with a validation exercise in Stripa Mine, Sweden.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. and Geomech. Abstr., 30(5), 503–526.
7.
Kulatilake, P. H. S. W., Ucpirti, H., and Stephansson, O. (1994). “Effect of finite size joints on the deformability of jointed rock at the two dimensional level.” Can. Geotech. J., 31, 364–374.
8.
Long, J. C. S., Remer, J. S., Wilson, C. R., and Witherspoon, P. A. (1982). “Porous media equivalent for networks of discontinuous fractures.” Water Resour. Res., 18(3), 645–658.
9.
Louis, C. (1974). Rock hydraulics in rock mechanics, L. Muller, ed., Springer, Vienna.
10.
Marsily, G.de. (1985). “Flow and transport in fractured rocks: Connectivity and scale effect.” Proc., Int. Assoc. of Hydrogeolog., Hydrogeol. of Rocks of Low Permeability, Memoirs, Tucson, Ariz., XVII, 267–277.
11.
Oda, M. (1982). “Fabric tensor for discontinuous geologic materials.” Soils and Found., 22, 96–108.
12.
Oda, M. (1985). “Permeability tensor for discontinuous rock masses.” Geotechnique, London, 35(4), 483–495.
13.
Panda, B. B., and Kulatilake, P. H. S. W. (1999a). “Effect of joint geometry and transmissivity on jointed rock hydraulics.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 125(1), 41–50.
14.
Panda, B. B., and Kulatilake, P. H. S. W. (1999b). “Relations between fracture tensor parameters and jointed rock hydraulics.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 125(1), 51–59.
15.
Panda, B. B. ( 1995). “Investigation of relations between the geometrical properties and hydraulic properties of jointed rock through numerical simulation.” PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz.
16.
Robinson, P. C. ( 1984). “Connectivity, flow and transport in network models of fractured media.” PhD thesis, Oxford University, Oxford, U.K.
17.
Rouleau, A., and Gale, J. E. (1987). “Stochastic discrete fracture simulation of ground water flow into an underground excavation in granite.” Intr. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abstr., 24(2), 99–112.
18.
Scheidegger, A. E. (1960). The physics of flow through porous media, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
19.
Schwartz, F. W., Smith, W. L., and Crowe, A. S. (1983). “A stochastic analysis of microscopic dispersion in fractured media.” Water Resour. Res., 19(5), 1253–1265.
20.
Segan, S., and Karasaki, K. (1993). “TRINET: A flow and transport code for fracture networks—user's manual and tutorial.” LBL-34834, Lawrence Berkely Laboratory, Berkeley, Calif.
21.
Shapiro, A. M., and Andersson, J. (1985). “Simulation of steady state flow in three dimensional fracture networks using boundary element method.” Advances in Water Resour., 8(3), 106–110.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 126 • Issue 8 • August 2000
Pages: 850 - 858
History
Received: Mar 22, 1999
Published online: Aug 1, 2000
Published in print: Aug 2000
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.