Rapid Evaluation of Individual's Ability to Control Hand Strength
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 125, Issue 9
Abstract
We present a rapid and simple evaluation of an individual's ability to control exertions in quasi-isometric conditions. This evaluation is based on a closed loop that consists mainly of a single-axis force measurement system and a computer screen. This provides simultaneously a visual input command and visual feedback to monitor the output exertions. Specific parameters (stability, period duration, deviation, and velocity) were defined and measured to describe the dexterity, accuracy, precision, and endurance associated with the concept of fine control. Tests undertaken by subjects revealed that it is easier to maintain exertion at 30 and 35% of MVC rather than 15 or 20% of MVC. Subjects who exercised provided the best performances. Fatigue seems to affect exertions at 45% of the MVC. The rhythmic activity of the muscle was also evaluated by showing specific frequencies associated with a subject's exertion, which range from 20 Hz up to 25 Hz. When documented, the obtained information is expected to be of interest in clinical practice.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aitkens, S., et al. (1989). “Relationship of manual testing to objective strength measurements.” Muscle and Nerve, 12, 173–177.
2.
Basmajian, J. (1979). Biofeedback principles and practice for clinicians. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.
3.
Crago, P., et al. (1991). “Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle.” IEEE Trans. on Biomedical Engrg., 38(1), 17–28.
4.
Hanafi, A., Cornu, J. Y., Courteville, A., and Gharbi, T. (1997). “Approach to evaluation of hand strength given visual biofeedback.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 123(12), 1215–1218.
5.
Hines, A., et al. (1992). “Assessment of input-output properties and control of neuroprosthetic had grasp.” IEEE Trans. Biomedical Engrg., 39(6), 610–623.
6.
Lamoreaux, L. (1995). “The effect of the wrist deviation on grip and pinch strength.” Clin. Orthop., 314, 152–155.
7.
Larsson, S., et al. (1996). “Single-fibre laser Doppler flowmetry and electromyography for evaluating microcirculation in forearm muscle during static and continuous handgrip contractions. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 73, 219–224.
8.
McAuley, J., et al. (1997). “Frequency peaks of tremor, muscle vibration and electromygraphic activity at 10 Hz, 20 Hz and 40 Hz.” Exp. Brain Res., 114, 525–541.
9.
Radhakrishnan, S., et al. (1993). “Analysis of hand forces in health and disease during maximum isometric grasping of cylinders.” Medical and Biol. Engrg. and Computing, 372–376.
10.
Scherrer, J. (1981). Précis de physiologie du travail notions d'ergonomie. Masson, Paris.
11.
Simard, T., and Roberge, J. (1985). Evaluation de la qualité du controle musculaire fin nouveaux apports. Masson, Paris, 156–167.
12.
Skerik, S. (1971). “Functional evaluation of congenital hand anomalies.” Am. J. of Occupational Therapy, 25, 98–104.
13.
Van Der Ploeg, B., et al. (1984). “Measuring muscle strength.” Neurology, 231, 200–203.
14.
Winters, J. ( 1991). “Concepts in neuromuscular modeling.” Three-dimensional analysis of human movement, R. Frey, ed., Human Kinematics, 257–292.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 125 • Issue 9 • September 1999
Pages: 1056 - 1061
History
Received: Dec 2, 1997
Published online: Sep 1, 1999
Published in print: Sep 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.