Differentiation of Noisy Experimental Data for Interpretation of Nonlinear Stress-Strain Behavior
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 124, Issue 7
Abstract
Interpretation of nonlinear stress-strain behavior of a material may require differentiating the load-displacement curve constructed from experimental data. Pressuremeter and torsional shear tests in geotechnical engineering are two examples that require such an operation. Differentiating experimental data is tricky because (1) it is very sensitive to the noise inevitably existing in the measurements, and (2) the experimental data are usually only available in discrete pairs, conventional finite-difference calculations give only an approximation to the true differentiation. For these reasons, in practice the direct differentiation of experimental data is rarely performed. Instead, the experimental data are usually fitted into a particular form of mathematical function, resulting in a set of parameters representing the material behavior in an optimum sense. This paper presents a markedly different approach. The method is based on the sampling theorem and utilizes a noise-filtered differentiator to simultaneously differentiate the data and filter out the noise. The method performs true differentiation without a preassumed mathematical expression. Examples are given to show the effectiveness and limitation of this reported method.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chen, A. T. F., and Stokoe, K. H. II. (1979). “Interpretation of strain-dependent modulus and damping from torsional soil tests.” U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
2.
Drnevich, V. P., Hall, J. R., and Richart, F. E., Jr. (1967). “Effects of the amplitude of vibration on the shear modulus of sand.”Proc., Int. Symp. on Wave Propagation and Dyn. Properties of Earth Mat., Univ. of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, N.M., 189–199.
3.
Hardin, B. O., and Drnevich, V. P.(1972). “Shear modulus and damping in soils: design equation and curves.”J. of Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 98(7), 667–692.
4.
Mair, R. J., and Wood, D. M. (1987). Pressuremeter testing. CIRIA Ground Engrg. Rep., Butterworth's, London, England.
5.
Nyquist, H.(1928). “Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory.”Trans. AIEE, 47, 617–644.
6.
Oppenheim, A. V., and Schafer, R. W. (1975). Digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7.
Palmer, A. C.(1972). “Undrained plane-strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clay: a simple interpretation of pressuremeter test.”Géotechnique, London, England, 22(3), 451–457.
8.
Prevost, J. H., and Hoeg, K.(1975). “Analysis of pressuremeter in strain softening soil.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 101(8), 717–732.
9.
Ramberg, W., and Osgood, W. R. (1943). “Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters.”Tech. Note 902, Nat. Advisory Com. for Aeronautics, Washington, D.C.
10.
Robertson, P. K., and Ferreira, R. S. (1993). “Seismic and pressuremeter testing to determine soil modulus.”Predictive Soil Mech., Proc., Wroth Memorial Symp., Oxford, England, U.K., 434–448.
11.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). “A mathematical theory of communication.”Bell Telephone Sys. Tech. Publ., Am. Telephone and Telegraph Co., New York.
12.
Stokoe, K. H., and Nazarian, S. (1985). “Use of Rayleigh waves in liquefaction studies.”Measurement and use of shear wave velocity for evaluating dynamic soil properties, R. D. Woods, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 1–17.
13.
Stokoe, K. H., and Woods, R. D. (1972). “Use of Rayleigh waves in liquefaction studies.”Measurement and use of shear wave velocity for evaluating dynamic soil properties, R. D. Woods, ed., ASCE, Reston, Va., 1–17
14.
Taylor, P. W. (1975). “Interpretation of dynamic torsion tests on soils.”Rep. No. 120, School of Engrg., Univ. of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
15.
Vucetic, M., and Dobry, R.(1991). “Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response.”J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 117(1), 89–107.
16.
Wilson, S. D., and Dietrich, D. J. (1960). “Effect of consolidation pressure on elastic and strength properties of clay.”Proc., Res. Conf. on Shear Strength of Cohesive Soils, ASCE, Reston, Va., 419–435.
17.
Woods, R. D., and Henke, R. (1979). “Seismic techniques in the laboratory.”Proc., ASCE Geophys. Methods in Geotech. Engrg. Convention, ASCE, Reston, Va., 293–322.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1998
Published in print: Jul 1998
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.