Comparison of Some Simulation Algorithms on Basis of Distribution
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 122, Issue 2
Abstract
The statistical distribution of the time series generated by three simulation algorithms of Gaussian stochastic processes are derived and compared. In all three methods, the time histories are modeled as weighted linear combinations of terms of the form cos(ωkt +φk) where the phases φk are independent random variables uniformly distributed in [0, 2π]. The frequencies ωk, however, are either deterministic parameters (the spectral representation algorithm), or independent random variables either uniformly distributed in a very small interval (the randomized spectral representation scheme) or distributed according to the specified power spectral density (the random frequencies algorithm). The results of the present investigation show that, from the standpoint of normality of the generated time series and irrespectively of computational aspects, the random frequencies algorithm performs always (considering first-order distributions) and generally (considering second-order distributions) better than or as well as the spectral representation technique and its randomized version, which yield almost identical probability density functions. Finally, if the spectral representation algorithm or its randomized version is used, it is recommended that the frequencies ωk be selected so that the energy associated with each term cos(ωkt +φk) be the same.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. E. (1972). Handbook of mathematical function . U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.
2.
Goto, H., and Toki, K.(1969). “Structural response to nonstationary random excitation.”Proc. 4th World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., Santiago, Chile, 1, 130–144.
3.
Grigoriu, M.(1993). “Spectral representation method in simulation.”Probabilistic Engrg. Mech., 8(2), 75–90.
4.
Hardy, G. H., Littlewood, J. E., and Polya, G. (1988). Inequalities . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
5.
Hudspeth, R. T., and Borgman, L. E. (1979). “Efficient FFT simulation of digital time sequences.”J. Engrg. Mech. Div., ASCE, 105(2), 223–235.
6.
Mignolet, M. P. (1993). “Chapter 7: Simulation of random processes and field by ARMA models: A review.”Computational stochastic mechanics: Theory, computational methodology and engineering applications. A. H.-D. Cheng, and C. Y. Yang, eds., Elsevier, The Netherlands, 149–173.
7.
Nigam, N. C. (1983). Introduction to random vibrations . MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
8.
Rice, S. O. (1954). “Mathematical analysis of random noise.”Selected papers on noise and stochastic processes, N. Wax, ed., Dover, New York, N.Y., 133–294.
9.
Shinozuka, M.(1971). “Simulation of multivariate and multi-dimensional random processes.”J. Acoustical Soc. of Am., 49, 357–367.
10.
Shinozuka, M., and Deodatis, G.(1991). “Simulation of stochastic processes by spectral representation.”Appl. Mech. Review, 44(4), 191–203.
11.
Shinozuka, M., and Jan, C.-M.(1972). “Digital simulation of random processes and its applications.”J. Sound and Vibration, 25(1), 111–128.
12.
Wittig, L. E., and Sinha, A. K.(1975). “Simulation of multicorrelated random processes using FFT algorithm.”J. Acoustic Soc. of Am., 58(3), 630–634.
13.
Yang, J.-N.(1972). “Simulation of random envelope processes.”J. Sound and Vibration, 21(1), 73–85.
14.
Yang, J.-N.(1973). “On the normality and accuracy of simulated random processes.”J. Sound and Vibration, 26(3), 417–428.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1996
Published in print: Feb 1996
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.