Role of Control-Structure Interaction in Protective System Design
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 121, Issue 2
Abstract
Most of the current research in the field of structural control for mitigation of responses due to extreme environmental loads does not directly account for the effects of control-structure interaction and actuator/sensor dynamics in analysis and design. The importance of including control-structure interaction when modeling a control system is discussed herein, and a general framework within which one can study its effect on protective systems is presented. A specific model for hydraulic actuators typical of those used in many protective systems is developed, and a natural velocity feedback link is shown to exist which tightly couples the dynamics of the hydraulic actuator to the dynamics of the structure to which it is attached. Experimental verification of this model is given. Numerical examples are provided that use seismically excited structures configured with active bracing, active tendon, and active mass driver systems. These examples show that accounting for control-structure interaction and actuator dynamics can significantly improve the performance and robustness of a protective system.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
“ATC 17-1.” (1993). Proceedings on seismic isolation, passive energy dissipation, and active control . Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif.
2.
DeSilva, C. W. (1989). Control sensors and actuators . Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 390–405.
3.
Chung, L. L., Reinhorn, A. M., and Soong, T. T.(1988). “Experiments on active control of seismic structures.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(2), 241–256.
4.
Chung, L. L., Lin, R. C., Soong, T. T., and Reinhorn, A. M.(1989). “Experiments on active control for MDOF seismic structures.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 115(8), 1609–1627.
5.
Proceedings of the U.S. National Workshop on Structural Control Research. (1990). G. W. Housner and S. F. Masri, eds. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
6.
Proceedings of the International Workshop on Structural Control. (1993). G. W. Housner and S. F. Masri, eds. University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
7.
Reinhorn, A. M., et al. (1989). “1:4 Scale Model Studies of Active Tendon Systems and Active Mass Dampers for Aseismic Protection.”Tech. Rep. NCEER-89-0026, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y.
8.
Soong, T. T. (1990). Active structural control: theory and practice . Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex, England.
9.
Soong, T. T., and Grigoriu, M. (1992). Random vibration of mechanical and structural systems . Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
10.
Spencer Jr., B. F., Suhardjo, J., and Sain, M. K. (1991). “Frequency domain control algorithms for civil engineering applications.”Proc., Int. Workshop on Technol. for Hong Kong's Infrastructure Development. The Commercial Press, Ltd., Hong Kong, 169–178.
11.
Spencer Jr., B. F., Suhardjo, J., and Sain, M. K.(1994). “Frequency domain optimal control strategies for aseismic protection.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 120(1), 135–159.
12.
Suhardjo, J., Spencer Jr., B. F., and Kareem, A.(1992). “Frequency domain optimal control of wind excited buildings.”J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 118(12), 2463–2481.
13.
Yao, J. T. P.(1972). “Concept of structural control.”J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 98(7), 1567–1574.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1995
Published in print: Feb 1995
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.