Bounds on Response Variability of Stochastic Systems
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 115, Issue 11
Abstract
A methodology to analytically and numerically evaluate the spectral distribution‐free upper bounds of the response variability of stochastic systems is developed. The structural systems examined consist of linearly elastic, statically determinate and indeterminate beams subjected to static loads. The analytical evaluation of these bounds is achieved by introducing the variability response function of the stochastic system. This is a function with many similarities to the frequency response function used in random vibration analysis. At the same time, the numerical evaluation of the bounds is carried out by means of the fast Monte Carlo simulation technique, which requires an extremely small sample size. In essence, the fast Monte Carlo simulation technique is a method to estimate numerically the variability response function, whose analytical evaluation is particularly cumbersome even for very simple stochastic systems. of equal importance is that this work provides not only insight into the underlying mechanisms controlling the response variability of a stochastic system, but also an analytical basis on which the analysis can be extended to trusses, frames, and two‐dimensional structures and eventually to nonlinear and/or dynamic problems.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Baecher, G. B., and Ingra, T. S. (1981). “Stochastic FEM in settlement predictions.” J. Geotech. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 107(4), 449–463.
2.
Bucher, C. G., and Shinozuka, M. (1988). “Structural response variability II.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(12), 2035–2054.
3.
Cambou, B. (1975). “Applications of first‐order uncertainty analysis in the finite elements method in linear elasticity.” Proc. of the Sec. Int. Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Struct. Engrg., Aachen, West Germany, 67–87.
4.
Handa, K., and Andersson, K. (1981). “Application of finite element methods in the statistical analysis of structures.” Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Struct. Safety and Reliability, Trondheim, Norway, 409–417.
5.
Hisada, T., and Nakagiri, S. (1981). “Stochastic finite element method developed for structural safety and reliability.” Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Struct. Safety and Reliability, 395–408.
6.
Hisada, T., and Nakagiri, S. (1985). “Role of stochastic finite element method in structural safety and reliability.” Proc. of the Fourth Int. Conference on Struct. Safety and Reliability, Kobe, Japan, 1.385–1.394.
7.
Liu, W. K., Belytschko, T., and Mani, A. (1986). “Probabilistic finite elements for nonlinear structural dynamics.” Comput. Methods in Appl. Mech. Engrg., 56(11), 61–81.
8.
Liu, W. K., Mani, A., and Belytschko, T. (1987). “Finite element methods in probabilistic mechanics.” J. Probabilistic Engrg. Mech., 2(4), 201–213, Southhampton, England.
9.
Shinozuka, M. (1987). “Structural response variability.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 113(6), 825–842.
10.
Shinozuka, M., and Deodatis, G. (1988). “Response variability of stochastic finite element systems.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(3), 499–519.
11.
Vanmarcke, E., et al. (1986). “Random fields and stochastic finite elements.” J. Struct. Safety, 3(3 and 4), 143–166, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
12.
Yamazaki, F., Shinozuka, M., and Dasgupta, G. (1988). “Neumann expansion for stochastic finite element analysis.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 114(8), 1335–1354.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Nov 1, 1989
Published in print: Nov 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.