Prager‐Shield Optimality Criteria for Linear Segmentation
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 115, Issue 1
Abstract
Static-kinematic optimality criteria are introduced for plastically designed structures having segments of prescribed length such that the variation of the cross sectional area is (1) Segmentwise linear; and (2) continuous across segment boundaries. It is shown that, compared to other geometrical constraints suggested in the past, these constraints have the following advantages: (1) Stress concentrations due to cross-sectional discontinuities are avoided; (2) unlike some unconstrained optimal solutions, the underlying assumptions of simple structural theories are not violated; and (3) a high degree of design flexibility, an easier fabrication (due to linear segments), and a greater material economy are achieved. The optimality criteria, which turn out to be similar to those of Foulkes, are derived in a general form and then they are applied to a clamped beam with four segments. This theory is being extended to (1) Elastic design; and (2) other types of structures (e.g., plates).
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Cheng, K. T., and Olhoff, N. (1981). “An investigation concerning the optimal design of solid plates.” Int. J. of Solids and Struct., 17(3), 305–323.
2.
Drucker, D. C., and Shield, R. T. (1957). “Design for minimum weight.” Proc. 9th Int. Congress on Applied Mechanics, book 5, Brussels, Belgium, 212–222.
3.
Foulkes, J. (1954). “The minimum weight design of structural frames.” Proc., Royal Society, London, England, series A., 223(1155), May, 482–494.
4.
Heyman, J. (1959). “On the absolute minimum weight design of framed structures.” Quat. J. of Mech. and Appl. Math., 12(3), 314–324.
5.
Niordson, F. I. (1983). “Optimal design of elastic plates with a constraint on the slope of the thickness function.” Int. J. of Solids and Struct., 19(2), 141–151.
6.
Prager, W., and Shield, R. T. (1967). “A general theory of optimal plastic design.” J. of Appl. Mech., 34(1), 184–186.
7.
Prager, W., and Taylor, J. E. (1968). “Problems of optimal structural design.” J. Appl. Mech., 35(1), 102–106.
8.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1973). “Optimal plastic design for partially preassigned strength distribution.” J. Optimization, Theory and Appl., 11(4), 421–436.
9.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1976). Optimal design of flexural systems. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
10.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1981). “Variational methods and optimality criteria.” Proc. NATO ASI Optimization of Distributed Parameter Struct. (1980), E. J. Haug and J. Cea, Eds. Sijthoff and Noordhoff, Alphen aan der Rijn, The Netherlands, 112–151.
11.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1986). “Prager‐shield optimality criteria with bounded spatial gradients.” J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 110(1), 129–136.
12.
Rozvany, G. I. N. (1988). Structural design via optimality criteria. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, The Netherlands.
13.
Rozvany, G. I. N., et al. (1982). “On the solid plate paradox in structural optimization.” J. Struct. Mech., 10(1), 1–32.
14.
Rozvany, G. I. N., Ong, T. G., and Karihaloo, B. L. (1986). “A general theory of optimal elastic design for structures with segmentation.” J. Appl. Mech., 53(2), 242–248.
15.
Save, M., and Prager, W. (1985). Structural optimization. Vol. 1, optimality criteria. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 ASCE.
History
Published online: Jan 1, 1989
Published in print: Jan 1989
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.