Uncertainties in Dynamic Soil‐Structure Interaction
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 110, Issue 2
Abstract
Uncertainties in dynamic soil‐structure interaction are divided into two groups: Model and parameter uncertainties. Modeling uncertainties are associated with the differences between the real world phenomenon and the model, and parameter uncertainties are uncertainties in the parameters which appear in the model definition. A method to evaluate the effect of parameter uncertainties on the dynamic response of a soil‐structure system is described and illustrated. The method is based on the response surface methodology and is fully compatible with current numerical modeling codes (computer programs) used to analyze dynamic soil‐structure interaction. It consists of the development of a graduating function which approximates the true response, based on a limited number of code evaluations. The graduating function, called the response surface, is then used to evaluate the effects of uncertainties in place of the soil‐structure interaction code. The method embodies the traditional parametric or sensitivity analysis techniques and can be considered an extension of the partial derivative method or first‐order, second‐moment method to the numerical realm.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Benjamin, J. R., and Cornell, C. A., Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw‐Hill, New York, N.Y., 1979.
2.
Box, G. E. P., and Wilson, K. B., “On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions,” Journal Royal Statistical Society, B, Vol. 13, 1951, pp. 1–34.
3.
Contreras, H., “Second Moment Approximation in Structural Design Using a Programmable Calculator,” Computers and Structures, Vol. 9, 1978, pp. 615–620.
4.
Hahn, G. J., and Shapiro, S. S., Statistical Models in Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., 1967.
5.
Mazumdar, M., et al., “Review of the Methodology for Statistical Evaluation of Reactor Safety Analysis,” EPRI 304, Westinghouse Electric Corporation for Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif., Sept., 1975.
6.
Rohani, B., “Probabilistic Solution for One‐Dimensional Plane Wave Propagation in Homogeneous Bilinear Hysteretic Materials,” Misc. Paper SL‐82‐7, U.S. Army Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., June, 1982.
7.
Rosenblueth, E., “Point Estimates for Probability Moments,” Proceedings National Academy Sciences, U.S.A., Vol. 72, No. 10, Oct., 1975, pp. 3812–3814.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 ASCE.
History
Published online: Feb 1, 1984
Published in print: Feb 1984
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.