Robust Penalty Method for Structural Synthesis
Publication: Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Volume 109, Issue 4
Abstract
The Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Technique (SUMT) offers an easy way of solving nonlinearly constrained problems. However, this algorithm frequently suffers from the need to minimize an ill‐conditioned penalty function. An ill‐conditioned minimization problem can be solved very effectively by posing the problem as one of integrating a system of stiff differential equations utilizing concepts from singular perturbation theory. This paper evaluates the robustness and the reliability of such a singular perturbation based SUMT algorithm on two different problems of structural optimization of widely separated scales. The report concludes that whereas conventional SUMT can be bogged down by frequent ill‐conditioning, especially in large scale problems, the singular perturbation SUMT has no such difficulty in converging to very accurate solutions.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aiken, R. C., and Lapidus, L., “An Effective Numerical Intergration Method for Typical Stiff Systems,” American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1974, pp. 368–375.
2.
Boggs, P. T., “An Algorithm, Based on Singular Perturbation Theory, for Ill‐Conditioned Minimization Problems,” SIAM, Journal of Numerical Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 5, 1977, pp. 830–843.
3.
Boggs, P. T., and Dennis, J. E., “A Stability Analysis for Perturbed Nonlinear Iterative Methods,” Math and Computers in Simulation, Vol. 30, 1976, pp. 199–215.
4.
Davidon, W. C., “Optimally Conditioned Optimization Algorithms Without Linear Searches,” Mathematical Programming, Vol. 9, 1975, pp. 1–30.
5.
Dennis, J. E., and More, J. J., “Quasi‐Newton Methods, Motivation and Theory,” Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Review, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1977, pp. 46–86.
6.
Fiacco, A. V., and McCormick, G. P., Nonlinear Programming; Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques, Wiley, New York, N.Y., 1968.
7.
Flaherty, J. E., and O'Malley, R. E., Jr., “The Numerical Solution of Boundary Value Problems for Stiff Differential Equations,” Vol. 31, No. 137, 1977, pp. 66–93.
8.
Haftka, R., and Starnes, J., “Applications of a Quadratic Extended Interior Penalty Function for Structural Optimization,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1976, pp. 718–724.
9.
Hoppenstadt, F., “Properties of Solutions of Ordinary Differential Equations with Small Parameters,” Comm. Pure Apl. Math., Vol. 24, 1971, pp. 807–840.
10.
Kamat, M. P., and Ruangsilasingha, P., “A Robust Sequential Unconstrainted Minimization Technique for Structural Optimization,” VPI‐E‐80‐20, Aug., 1981.
11.
Miranker, W. L., “Numerical Methods of Boundary Layer Type for Stiff Systems of Differential Equations,” Computing, Vol. 11, 1973, pp. 221–234.
12.
Oren, S. S., and Luenberger, D., “Self‐Scaling Variable Metric (SSVM) Algorithms, Part I,” Management Science, Vol. 20, No. 5, 1974, pp. 545–862.
13.
Oren, S. S., and Spedicato, E., “Optimal Conditioning of Self‐Scaling Variable Metric Algorithms,” Math. Prog., Vol. 10, 1976, pp. 70–90.
14.
Powell, M. J. D., “A New Algorithm for Unconstrained Optimization,” Nonlinear Programming, J. Rosen, eds., Academic Press, New York, N.Y., 1970, pp. 31–66.
15.
Snanno, D. F., and Phua, K. H., “Matrix Conditioning and Nonlinear Optimization,” Math. Prog., Vol. 14, 1978, pp. 149–160.
16.
Venkayya, V. B., Khot, N. S., and Reddy, V. S., “Energy Distribution in an Optimum Structural Design,” AFFDL‐TR‐68‐156, 1968.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 ASCE.
History
Published online: Aug 1, 1983
Published in print: Aug 1983
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.