TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 2008

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Best Management Practices Using Dynamic Modeling

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 8

Abstract

Structural best management practices (BMPs) have become a tool for stormwater managers to achieve water quality improvement and regulatory compliance. Existing empirical evaluation of BMP performance is valuable, but has limited applicability to predict BMP performance over extended durations under a variety of storm types. This study applies a dynamic model to simulate BMP performance over a 10-year period. The BMP model used hourly output from a calibrated and validated land-use model to evaluate two BMP types: a retention facility and a flow-through swale. The model evaluated each BMP alone and in series targeting volume, total suspend solids, and total copper. Effectiveness was based on load reduction, event mean concentrations, and frequency of exceedence of relevant water quality standards. The model predicted over 60% removal of solids and copper over most conditions; however, effectiveness was reduced during large storms and wet years. Although performance was similar based on load reduction and water quality standard exceedence, the latter was most sensitive to storm size. This study demonstrates that BMP modeling can help managers understand expected BMP performance over a range of storms, time periods, and design parameters, and, perhaps more significantly, evaluate BMPs in series.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by funding from the Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (Contract No. 03-139-554-0) and the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project. We thank Steve Weisberg and Ken Schiff of SCCWRP, Steve Carter and John Riverson of Tetra Tech, Inc., and two anonymous reviewers for providing valuable suggestions and input on drafts of this paper.

References

Ackerman, D., Schiff, K., and Weisberg, S. (2005). “Evaluating HSPF in an arid, urbanized watershed.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 477–486.
Ackerman, D., and Weisberg, S. (2006). “Evaluating HSPF runoff and water quality at multiple time and spatial scales.” Biennial Rep., Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Westminster, Calif., 293–303.
Bay, S., Schiff, K., Greenstein, D., and Tiefenthaler, L. (1998). “Stormwater runoff effects on Santa Monica Bay, toxicity, sediment quality, and benthic community impacts.” Proc., California and the World Ocean ’97, O. Magoon, H. Converse, B. Baird, and M. Miller-Henson, eds., Reston, Va., 900–921.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jr., Jobes, T. H., and Donigian, A. S., Jr. (2001). Hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN, version 12, AQUATERRA Consultants, Mountain View, Calif.
Boulanger, B., and Nikolaidis, N. P. (2003). “Modeling framework for managing copper in urban watersheds.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(2), 337–345.
Brun, S. E., and Band, L. E. (2000). “Simulating runoff behavior in an urbanizing watershed.” Comput. Environ. Urban Syst., 24, 5–22.
Claytor, R. A., and Schueler, T. R. (1996). Design of stormwater filtering systems, The Center for Watershed Protection, Ellicott City, Md.
Clear Creek Solutions (CCS). (2006). Western Washington hydrology model version 3.0 user’s manual, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, Wash.
Coon, W. F. (2003). “Simulating land-use changes and stormwater-detention basins and evaluating their effect on peak streamflows and stream water quality in Irondequoit Creek Basin, New York—A user’s manual for HSPF and GenScn.” Open-File Rep. 03-136, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Cryer, S., Fouch, M., Peacock, A., and Havens, P. (2001). “Characterizing agrochemical patterns and effective BMPs for surface waters using mechanistic modeling and GIS.” Environ. Model. Assess., 6, 195–208.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minani, C. (1998). “Optimization of bioretention design for water quality and gydrologic characteristics.” Prince George’s County, Maryland, Final Rep. 01-04-31032, Prince George’s County, Maryland, Dept. of Environmental Resources, Largo, Md.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minani, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73, 5.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minani, C., and Winogradoff, D. (2003). “Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper, and zinc removal.” Water Environ. Res., 75(1), 73–82.
Dorman, M., Hartigan, J., Steg, R., and Quaserbarth, T. (1989). “Retention, detention, and overland flow for pollutant removal from highway stormwater runoff.” Research Rep. FHWA/RD 89/202, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
Fontaine, T. A., and Jacomino, V. M. J. (1997). “Sensitivity analysis of simulated contaminated sediment transport.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 33, 313–326.
Harper, H., and Herr, J. (1993). “Treatment efficiencies of detention ponds with filtration systems.” Final Rep. to Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation, Environmental Research and Design, Inc., Orlando, Fla.
Heasom, W., Welker, A., and Traver, R. (2006). “Hydrologic modeling of a bioinfiltration best management practice.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42, 1329–1347.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Im, S., Brannan, K. M., and Mostaghimi, S. (2003). “Simulating hydrologic and water quality impacts in an urbanizing watershed.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39, 1465–1479.
Kercher, N., Landon, J., and Massarelli, R. (1983). “Grassed swales prove cost-effective for water pollution control.” Public Works, 16, 53–55.
Millar, S., Flinker, P., Dodson, H. L., Cour, S. L., Blanchette, H., Wilson, K., Claytor, R., and Kelly, N. (2005). The urban environmental design manual, Rhode Island Dept. of Environmental Management, Providence, R.I.
Moore, L. W., Chew, C. Y., Smith, R. H., and Sahoo, S. (1992). “Modeling of best management practices on North Reelfoot Creek, Tennessee.” Water Environ. Res., 64(3), 241–247.
Pitt, R. E. (2002). “Receiving water impacts associated with urban runoff.” Handbook of ecotoxicology, 2nd Ed., D. Hoffman, B. Rattner, G. A. Burton, Jr., and J. Cairns, Jr., eds., CRC-Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla.
Prince George’s County Department of Environmental Resources (PGDER). (1993). Design manual for use of bioretention in stormwater management, Division of Environmental Management, Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, Md.
Roesner, L. A., and Bledsoe, B. P. (2003). “Physical effects of wet weather flows on aquatic habitats: Present knowledge and research needs.” Rep. No. 00-WSM-4, Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, Va.
Sample, D. J., Heaney, J. P., Wright, L. T., Fan, C.-Y., Lai, F.-H., and Field, R. (2003). “Costs of best management practices and associated land for urban stormwater control.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(1), 59–68.
Tetra Tech. (2006). Low-impact development management practices evaluation computer module, Tetra Tech, Fairfax, Va.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000a). “Bioretention applications Inglewood demonstration project, Largo, Maryland; Florida Aquarium, Tampa, Florida.” EPA-841-B-00-005A, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000b). Low-impact development (LID): A literature review, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2000c). 40 CFR Part 131 “Water quality standards: Establishment of numeric criteria for priority toxic pollutants for the state of California.” 40 CFR Part 131, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Wang, T., Spyridakis, D., Mar, B., and Horner, R. (1981). “Transport, deposition, and control of heavy metals in highway runoff.” FHWA-WA-RD-39-10, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Washington, Seattle.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134Issue 8August 2008
Pages: 628 - 639

History

Received: May 3, 2007
Accepted: Nov 19, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Drew Ackerman
Modeler, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Eric D. Stein
Principal Scientist, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, 3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 110, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share