TECHNICAL PAPERS
Aug 1, 2008

Spurious Correlation in the USEPA Rating Curve Method for Estimating Pollutant Loads

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 8

Abstract

Water quality models are important tools used for developing total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), which are used to implement water quality standards. The writers have developed a tool which spatially interpolates output from the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model (WSM) and requires little time, data, or training. In contrast, the WSM requires extensive time, data, and training to run. This study examines if the writers’ tool provides accurate estimates of pollutant loads as compared to observed pollutant loads calculated using two different rating curve methods. The accuracy of the tool was assessed based on Nash–Sutcliffe coefficients. This study found that the tool provided moderate estimates of total nitrogen, poor estimates of total phosphorus, and that the rating curve method used to calculate observed loads affected the conclusion of the accuracy of the writers’ tool for predicting total sediment. A key finding of this study is that the widely used load-derived method for calculating observed loads exhibits spurious correlation. The writers discuss the imperative need to use sound statistical methods when estimating pollutant loads and TMDLs, and suggest an alternative approach for developing rating curves which is not subject to the problem of spurious correlation.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Benson, M. A. (1965). “Spurious correlations in hydraulics and hydrology.” J. Hydr. Div., 91(4), 35–42.
Berges, J. A. (1997). “Ratios, regression statistics, and ‘spurious’ correlations.” Limnol. Oceanogr., 42(5), 1006–1007.
Brett, M. T. (2004). “When is a correlation between non-independent variables ‘spurious?’” Oikos, 105, 647–656.
Carpenter, S. R., Caraco, N. F., Correll, D. L., Howarth, R. W., Sharpley, A. N., and Smith, V. H. (1998). “Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen.” Ecol. Appl., 8(3), 559–568.
Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP). (2004). “The state of the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed.” CBP-TRS-273-05, EPA-903-R-04-009, USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Md.
Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP). (2005). “Nutrient pollution.” ⟨http://www.chesapeakebay.net/nutr1.htm⟩ (March 2007).
Correll, D. C., Wu, T., and Pierce, J. W. (1976a). “Aquatic plant die-offs in Chesapeake Bay: Relationship to light penetration and/or herbicide pollution.” EPA903/9-76-001, EPA, Athens, Ga., Vol. I.
Correll, D. C., Wu, T., and Pierce, J. W. (1976b). “Aquatic plant die-offs in Chesapeake Bay: Relationship to light penetration and/or herbicide pollution.” EPA903/9-76-001, EPA, Athens, Ga., Vol. II.
Evans, B. M., Lehning, D. W., Corradini, K. J., Petersen, G. W., Nizeyimana, E., Hamlett, P. D., Robillard, P. D., and Day, R. L. (2002). “A comprehensive GIS-based modeling approach for predicting nutrient loads in watersheds.” J. Spatial Hydrology, 2(2), 1–18.
Gilroy, E. J., Kirby, W. H., Cohn, T. A., and Glysson, G. D. (1990). “Discussion of ‘Uncertainty in suspended sediment transport curves’ by McBean and Al-Nassri.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 116(1), 143–145.
Hao, O. J., and Neethling, J. B. (1987). “Effect of ratio correlation on data interpretation.” J. Environ. Eng., 113(1), 205–211.
Hopkins, K., Brown, B., Linker, L. C., and Mader, R. L., Jr. (2000). “Chesapeake Bay Watershed model land use and model linkages to the airshed and estuarine models.” Rep. of the Modeling Subcommittee, USEPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Md.
Kenney, B. C. (1982). “Beware of spurious self-correlations!” Water Resour. Res., 18(4), 1041–1048.
Maryland Cooperative Extension (MCE). (2006). “How the MCE agricultural nutrient management program got started.” Agricultural Nutrient Management Program, ⟨http://www.agnr.umd.edu/users/agron/nutrient/Bkgrnd/HistoryANMP.pdf⟩ (March 2007).
Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE). (2005). “Total maximum daily loads of nitrogen, phosphorus and biochemical oxygen demand for Breton Bay in St. Mary’s County, Maryland.” Maryland Department of the Environment, Baltimore, ⟨http://www.mde.state.md.us/assets/document/bb-main060805_final.pdf⟩ (March 2007).
Mattikalli, N. M., and Richards, K. S. (1996). “Estimation of surface water quality changes in response to land use change: Application of the export coefficient model using remote sensing and geographical information system.” J. Environ. Manage., 48, 262–282.
McCuen, R. H. (1993). Microcomputer applications in statistical hydrology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Moglen, G. E. (2007). “GISHydro nutrient loading interpolator for the Chesapeake Bay program model.” ⟨http://www.gishydro.umd.edu/documents/mde-reports/MDE-Loading-Final-Report.pdf⟩ (May 2007).
Nash, J. E., and Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). “River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I—A discussion of principles.” J. Hydrol., 10, 282–290.
Pearson, K. (1897). “On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organs.” Proc. R. Soc. London, 60, 489–498.
Shoemaker, L., Dai, T., and Koenig, J. (2005). “TMDL model evaluation and research needs.” EPA 600-R-05-149, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1999). “Protocol for developing nutrient TMDLs.” EPA 841-B-99-007, Office of Water (4503F), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2005). Draft handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters, EPA 841-B-05-005, Office of Water: Nonpoint Source Control Branch, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2005). “The impact of sediment on the Chesapeake Bay and its watershed.” ⟨http://chesapeake.usgs.gov/SedimentBay605.pdf⟩ (March 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007a). “National water quality assessment data warehouse.” ⟨http://infotrek.er.usgs.gov/traverse/f?p=NAWQA:HOME:755096144276101⟩ (March 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007b). “Water—Nutrients.” USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities, ⟨http://chesapeake.usgs.gov/nutrients.html⟩ (March 2007).
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (2007c). “Water—Sediments.” USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities, ⟨http://chesapeake.usgs.gov/sediments.html⟩ (March 2007).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134Issue 8August 2008
Pages: 610 - 618

History

Received: Sep 4, 2007
Accepted: Feb 4, 2008
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dorianne E. Shivers
Graduate Student, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Glenn E. Moglen
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering and National Center for Smart Growth Research and Education, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share