Hydrologic and Water Quality Integration Tool: HydroWAMIT
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 8
Abstract
A spatially distributed and continuous hydrologic model focusing on total maximum daily load (TMDL) projects was developed. Hydrologic models frequently used for TMDLs such as the hydrologic simulation program—FORTRAN (HSPF), soil and water assessment tool (SWAT), and generalized watershed loading function (GWLF) differ considerably in terms of spatial resolution, simulated processes, and linkage flexibility to external water quality models. The requirement of using an external water quality model for simulating specific processes is not uncommon. In addition, the scale of the watershed and water quality modeling, and the need for a robust and cost-effective modeling framework justify the development of alternative watershed modeling tools for TMDLs. The hydrologic and water quality integration tool (HydroWAMIT) is a spatially distributed and continuous time model that incorporates some of the features of GWLF and HSPF to provide a robust modeling structure for TMDL projects. HydroWAMIT operates within the WAMIT structure, developed by Omni Environmental LLC for the Passaic River TMDL in N. J. HydroWAMIT is divided into some basic components: the hydrologic component, responsible for the simulation of surface flow and baseflow from subwatersheds; the nonpoint-source (NPS) component, responsible for the calculation of the subwatershed NPS loads; and the linkage component, responsible for linking the flows and loads from HydroWAMIT to the water quality analysis simulation program (WASP). HydroWAMIT operates with the diffusion analogy flow model for flow routing. HydroWAMIT provides surface runoff, baseflow and associated loads as outputs for a daily timestep, and is relatively easy to calibrate compared to hydrologic models like HSPF. HydroWAMIT assumes that the soil profile is divided into saturated and unsaturated layers. The water available in the unsaturated layer directly affects the surface runoff from pervious areas. Surface runoff from impervious areas is calculated separately according to precipitation and the impervious fractions of the watershed. Baseflow is given by a linear function of the available water in the saturated zone. The utility of HydroWAMIT is illustrated for the North Branch and South Branch Raritan River Watershed (NSBRW) in New Jersey. The model was calibrated, validated, and linked to the WASP. The NPS component was tested for total dissolved solids. Available weather data and point-source discharges were used to prepare the meteorological and flow inputs for the model. Digital land use, soil type datasets, and digital elevation models were used for determining input data parameters and model segmentation. HydroWAMIT was successfully calibrated and validated for monthly and daily flows for the NSBRW outlet. The model statistics obtained using HydroWAMIT are comparable with statistics of HSPF and SWAT applications for medium and large drainage areas. The results show that HydroWAMIT is a feasible alternative to HSPF and SWAT, especially for large-scale TMDLs that require particular processes for water quality simulation and minor hydrologic model calibration effort.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The modeling work discussed herein was developed with funding provided by the N.J. Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). The modeling work has not, to date, been evaluated by the NJDEP and the NJDEP takes no position with respect to the modeling work.
References
Ackerman, D., and Schiff, K. (2003). “Modeling stormwater mass emissions to the southern California bight.” J. Environ. Eng., 129(4), 308–317.
Ambrose, R. B., Wool, T. A., and Martin, J. L. (1993). “The water quality analysis simulation program, WASP-5, Part A.” Model documentation, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Ga.
Arnold, J. G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R. S., and Williams, J. R. (1998). “Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment. Part I: Model Development.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 34(1), 73–89.
Bicknell, B. R., Imhoff, J. C., Kittle, J. L., Jr., Jobes, T. H., and Donigian, A. S., Jr. (2001). Hydrological simulation program—FORTRAN (HSPF), user’s manual for version 12.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
Butcher, J. B. (2003). “Buildup, washoff, and event mean concentrations.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 39(6), 1521–1528.
Caruso, B. S. (2004). “Modeling metals transport and sediment/water interactions in a mining impacted mountain stream.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 40(6), 1603–1615.
Cerucci, M., Amidon, T. W., and Jaligama, G. (2007). “Enhanced simulation on nonpoint sources of nutrients based on stormwater and baseflow field measurements.” Proc., 80th Annual Water Environmental Federation Technical Exhibition and Conf. (WEFTEC) (CD-ROM), Water Environmental Federation, Alexandria, Va.
Cerucci, M., Cosgrove, J. F., and Amidon, T. W. (2005). “Modeling water quality for the nontidal Passaic River system.” Proc., Water Environmental Federation—2005 TMDL Specialty Conf. (CD-ROM), Water Environmental Federation, Alexandria, Va.
Di Toro, D. M., Fitzpatrick, J. J., and Thomann, R. V. (1983). “Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) and model verification program (MVP).” Documentation, Hydroscience, Inc., Westwood, N.Y.
Donigian, A. S., Imhoff, J. C., and Bicknell, B. R. (1983). “Predicting water quality resulting from agricultural non-point-source pollution via simulation—HSPF.” Agricultural management and water quality, F. W. Schaller and G. W. Bailey, eds., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
Haith, D. A., Mandel, R., and Shyan Wu, R. (1992). “GWLF: Generalized watershed loading functions version 2.0.” User’s manual, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Hamon, W. R. (1961). “Estimating potential evapotranspiration.” J. Hydr. Div., 87(3), 107–120.
Jobson, H. E. (1989). “Users manual for an open-channel streamflow model based on the diffusion analogy.” Open File Rep. 89-4133, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Garbretch, J., and Martz, L. W. (2000). “Digital elevation model issues in water resources modeling.” Hydrologic and hydraulic modeling support with geographic information systems, D. Maidment and D. Djokic, eds., ESRI, Redlands, Calif., 1–27.
Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., and Rodhe, A. (1999). “Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations.” Agric. Forest Meteorol., 98-99, 257–277.
Neitsch, S. L., Arnold, J. G., Kiniry, J. R., Williams, J. R., and King, K. W. (2002). “Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation—Version 2000.” GSWRL Rep. 02-01, Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory, Temple, Tex.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). (1998). “NJDEP Streams County, New Jersey (1:24,000).” ⟨http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/digidownload.htm⟩ (May 2006 ).
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). (2000). “NJDEP 1995/97 land use/land cover update.” ⟨http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/lulc95shp.html⟩ (May 2006 ).
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). (2002). “NJDEP 10-meter digital elevation grid.” ⟨http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/wmalattice.html⟩ (May 2006 ).
Ramanarayanan, T. S., Williams, J. R., Dugas, W. A., Hauck, L. M., and McFarland, A. M. S. (1997). “Using APEX to identify alternative practices for animal waste management. Part II: Model application.” American Society of Agricultural Engineers, ASAE Paper 97-2209, St. Joseph, Mich.
Reckhow, K. H., and Chapra, S. C. (1983). “Confirmation of water quality models.” Ecol. Modell., 20, 113–133.
Santhi, C., Arnold, J. G., Williams, J. R., Hauck, L. M., and Dugas, W. A. (2001). “Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and non-point-source pollution.” Trans. ASAE, 44(6), 1559–1570.
Singh, J., Knapp, H. V., Arnold, J. G., and Demissie, M. (2005). “Hydrological modeling of the Iroquois River Watershed using HSPF and SWAT.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(2), 343–360.
Shoemaker, L., Lahlou, M., Bryer, M., Kumar, D., and Kratt, K. (1997). “Compendium of tools for watershed assessment and TMDL development.” Rep. EPA841-B-97-006, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
TRC Omni Environmental (TRC). (2006). HydroWAMIT technical manual and theory, TRC Omni Environmental, Princeton, N.J.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1998). TMDL case study: Tar Pamlico Basin, North Carolina, Office of Water, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). “Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources—BASINS version 3.0, User’s manual.” EPA-823-B-01-001, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
United States Department of Agriculture–Soil and Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). (1986). “Urban hydrology for small watersheds.” Technical Release 55, USDA-SCS, Washington, D.C.
Van Liew, M. W., Arnold, J. G., and Garbrecht, J. D. (2003). “Hydrologic simulation on agricultural watersheds: Choosing between two models.” Trans. ASAE, 46(6), 1539–1551.
White, K. L., and Chaubey, I. (2005). “Sensitivity analysis, calibration, and validations for a multisite and multivariable SWAT Model.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(5), 1077–1089.
Wool, A. T., Ambrose, R. B., Martin, J. L., and Corner, E. A. (2003). Water quality analysis simulation program (WASP) version 6, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Ga.
Wu, J., Zou, R., and Yu, S. L. (2006). “Uncertainty analysis for couple watershed and water quality modeling systems.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 132(5), 351–361.
Yagow, G. (2004). “Using GWLF for development of reference watershed approach TMDLs.” Proc., 2004 American Society of Agricultural Engineers Annual Meeting, American Society of Agriculture Engineers, Paper No. 042262, St. Joseph, Mich.
Zou, R., Carter, S., Shoemaker, L., Parker, A., and Henry, T. (2006). “Integrated hydrodynamic and water quality modeling system to support nutrient total maximum daily load development for Wissahickon Creek, Pennsylvania.” J. Environ. Eng., 132(4), 555–566.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134 • Issue 8 • August 2008
Pages: 600 - 609
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Apr 6, 2007
Accepted: Dec 10, 2007
Published online: Aug 1, 2008
Published in print: Aug 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.