Pollutant Removal and Peak Flow Mitigation by a Bioretention Cell in Urban Charlotte, N.C.
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 5
Abstract
Bioretention is a stormwater treatment practice that has gained popularity due to its aesthetics, potential to reduce flooding, and early documented improvements to stormwater quality. A bioretention cell in an urban setting was examined in Charlotte, N.C. from 2004 to 2006. Flow-weighted, composite water quality samples were collected for 23 events and analyzed for TKN, , , TP, TSS, BOD-5, Cu, Zn, Fe, and Pb. Grab samples were collected from 19 storms for fecal coliform and 14 events for Escherichia coli (E. coli). There were significant reductions in the concentrations of TN, TKN, , BOD-5, fecal coliform, E. Coli, TSS, Cu, Zn, and Pb. Iron concentrations significantly increased . concentrations were essentially unchanged. Efficiency ratios for TN, TKN, , TP, and TSS were 0.32, 0.44, 0.73, 0.31, and 0.60, respectively. Fecal coliform and E. coli efficiency ratios were 0.69 and 0.71, respectively. Efficiency ratios for Zn, Cu, and Pb were 0.77, 0.54, and 0.31, respectively. Concentrations of Fe increased by 330%. The peak outflow of the bioretention cell for 16 storms with less than of rainfall was at least 96.5% less than the peak inflow, with a mean peak flow reduction being 99%. These results indicated that in an urban environment, bioretention systems can reduce concentrations of most target pollutants, including pathogenic bacteria indicator species. Additionally, bioretention can effectively reduce peak runoff from small to midsize storm events.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
Acknowledgments
The writers would like to thank John McCulloch, Frank Hahne, and John Beller of the Mecklenburg County Water Quality Program and Shawn Kennedy of N.C. State University for their assistance in completing this study. The research was funded by the City of Charlotte, North Carolina.
References
Bannerman, R. T., Owens, D. W., Dodds, R. B., and Hornewer, N. J. (1993). “Sources of pollutants in Wisconsin stormwater.” Water Sci. Technol., 28, 241–259.
Barrett, M. E. (2003). “Performance, cost, and maintenance requirements of Austin sand filters.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 129(3), 234–242.
Coffman, L., Green, R., Clar, M., and Bitter, S. (1993). “Development of bioretention practices for stormwater management.” Proc., Water Management in the 90’s: A time for innovation, ASCE, Reston, Va., 126–129.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., and Minami, C. (2001). “Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management.” Water Environ. Res., 73(1), 5–14.
Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., and Winogradoff, D. (2003). “Water quality improvement through bioretention, lead, copper, and zinc removal.” Water Environ. Res., 75(1), 73–82.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2005). “A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment.” Water, Air, Soil Pollut., 167(1–4), 123–138.
Dietz, M. E., and Clausen, J. C. (2006). “Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 40(4), 1335–1340.
Hager, M. C. (2003). “Low-impact development, Lot-level approaches to stormwater management are gaining ground.” Stormwater, 4(1), 12–25.
Hardy, D. H., Tucker, M. R., and Stokes, C. E. (2003). “Crop fertilization based on North Carolina soil tests.” Circular No. 1, N.C. Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Agronomic Division, Raleigh, N.C.
Heasom, W., Traver, R. G., and Welker, A. (2006). “Hydrologic modeling of a bioinfiltration best management practice.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(5), 1329–1347.
Hsieh, C.-H., and Davis, A. P. (2005). “Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(11), 1521–1531.
Hunt, W. F. (2003). “Pollutant removal evaluation and hydraulic characterization for bioretention stormwater treatment devices.” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, Pennsylvania State Univ., State College, Pa.
Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., and Sharkey, L. J. (2006). “Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(6), 600–608.
Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., and Davis, A. P. (2003). “Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff.” Water Environ. Res., 75(4), 355–367.
Meschke, J. S., and Sobsey, M. D. (2003). “Comparative reduction of Norwalk virus, poliovirus type 1, RNA coliphage MS2 and Escherichia coli in miniature soil columns.” Water Sci. Technol., 47(3), 85–90.
North Carolina Climate Office. (2006). ⟨http//www.nc-climate.ncsu.edu/cronos/normals.php?station=311690⟩ (November 20, 2006).
North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). (1999). Stormwater best management practice design manual, North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources, Raleigh, N.C.
Pitt, R., Field, R., Lalor, M., and Brown, M. (1995). “Urban stormwater toxic pollutants: Assessment, sources, and reliability.” Water Environ. Res., 67(3), 260–275.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2003). “Bacterial water quality standards for recreational waters (freshwater and marine waters) status report.” Rep. No. EPA-823-R-03–008, USEPA, Washington, D. C.
Wossink, G. A., and Hunt, W. F. (2003). “Cost effectiveness analysis of structural stormwater best management practices in North Carolina.” Rep. No. 344, North Carolina Water Resources Research Institute, Raleigh, N.C.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2008 ASCE.
History
Received: Feb 28, 2007
Accepted: Jul 13, 2007
Published online: May 1, 2008
Published in print: May 2008
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.