TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 1, 2008

Assessing Uncertainty in Mass Balance Calculation of River Nonpoint Source Loads

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134, Issue 4

Abstract

Several sources of uncertainty are considered in using field data to perform mass balance calculations to estimate nonpoint source (NPS) loads of total dissolved solids (TDS) and selenium (Se) to two reaches along the Lower Arkansas River in Colorado. This approach renders stochastic models of the mass balance equations for each river reach, where the input variables and their associated parameters are treated as random variables described by probability distributions. A data set collected in an intensive field effort conducted over several years is used in developing the models. Monte Carlo simulation solves the stochastic mass balance equations to describe distributions of possible values of the NPS loads. Results indicate that uncertainty in these calculated loads is sizeable. Annual average coefficient of variation (CV) in calculated total NPS TDS loads for sample periods within the two reaches ranges between 0.15 and 2.76, averaging about 1.1. For the Se mass balance along the downstream reach, the average CV in calculated loads is 0.23. The 90% prediction interval width for total NPS TDS load averaged over the 58 sample periods along the upstream reach is 13,691(kgday)km , compared to an overall average mean load of 8,383(kgday)km . It is 8,545(kgday)km averaged over the 61 sample periods downstream, compared to an overall average mean load of 11,183(kgday)km . For the Se load, the overall average 90% prediction interval width is also substantial compared to the overall average mean: 0.028(kgday)km compared to 0.038(kgday)km . Change in stored solute mass within the river over sample periods is found to be a major contributing factor to the calculation of NPS loads. Also, sensitivity analyses are performed that yield information on the relative influence that the degree of uncertainty in each random parameter has on the uncertainty in the calculated solute loads.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (Colorado Nonpoint Source Program), the Colorado Water Resources Research Institute, the Colorado Agricultural Experiment Station, the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, and the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District. Special appreciation is extended to more than 120 farmers and landowners and to numerous faculty and students at Colorado State University who have assisted in the field data collection efforts in the Arkansas River Valley.

References

Aulenbach, B. T., and Hooper, R. P. (2006). “The composite method: an improved method for stream-water solute load estimation.” Hydrolog. Process., 20(14), 29–47.
Buhman, D. L., Gates, T. K., and Watson, C. C. (2002). “Stochastic variability of fluvial hydraulic geometry: Mississippi and Red rivers.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 128(4), 426–437.
Burkhalter, J. P., and Gates, T. K. (2005). “Agroecological impacts from salinization and waterlogging in an irrigated river valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 131(2), 197–209.
Burkhalter, J. P., and Gates, T. K. (2006). “Evaluating regional solutions to salinization and waterlogging in an irrigated river valley.” J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 132(1), 21–30.
Butler, D. L., and Leib, K. J. (2002). “Characterization of selenium in the lower Gunnison River Basin, Colorado, 1988–2000.” Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 02-4151, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
Chiang, P.-C., and Gates, T. K. (2004). “Strategic river water quality planning using calibrated stochastic simulation.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 130(3), 215–231.
de Azevedo, L. G. T., Gates, T. K., Fontane, D. G., Labadie, J. W., and Porto, R. (2000). “Integration of water quantity and quality in strategic river basin planning.” J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 126(2), 85–97.
Donnelly, J. P., and Gates, T. K. (2005). “Assessing irrigation-induced selenium and iron in the lower Arkansas River Valley, Colorado.” Proc., World Water & Environ. Resources Congress, ASCE, Reston, Va.
Gates, T. K., and Al-Zahrani, M. A. (1996a). “Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. I: Model and its parameter data.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 122(11), 641–651.
Gates, T. K., and Al-Zahrani, M. A. (1996b). “Spatiotemporal stochastic open-channel flow. II: Simulation experiments.” J. Hydraul. Eng., 122(11), 652–661.
Gates, T. K., Garcia, L. A., and Labadie, J. W. (2006). “Toward optimal water management in Colorado’s Lower Arkansas River Valley: Monitoring and modeling to enhance agriculture and environment.” Colo. Water Resour. Res. Inst. Completion Rep. No. 205, Colo. Agric. Exp. Stat. Tech. Rep. No. TR06-10, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, Colo.
Greenberg, A. E., Clesceri, L. S., and Eaton, A. D. (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Herlich, K., ed. (1990). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists, 15th Ed., Associates Analytical Chemistry, Arlington, Va.
Ice, G. (2004). “History of innovative best management practice development and its role in addressing water quality limited waterbodies.” J. Environ. Eng., 130(6), 684–689.
Jain, C. K. (1996). “Application of chemical mass balance to upstream/downstream river monitoring points.” J. Hydrol., 182, 105–115.
Jaworski, N. A., Groffman, P. M., Keller, A. A., and Prager, J. C. (1992). “A watershed nitrogen and phosphorus balance: The Upper Potomac River Basin.” Estuaries, 15(1), 83–95.
Jha, R., Ojha, C. S. P., and Bhatia, K. K. S. (2005). “Estimating nutrient outflow from agricultural watersheds to the River Kali in India.” J. Environ. Eng., 131(12), 1706–1715.
Krupnick, A., Morgenstern, R., Batz, M., Nelson, P., Burtraw, D., Shih, J.-S., and McWilliams, M. (2006). Not a sure thing: Making regulatory choices under uncertainty, Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
National Research Council. (2001). Assessing the TMDL approach to water quality management, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Palisade Corporation. (2005). Guide to using @RISK: Risk analysis and simulation add-in for Microsoft Excel, version 4.5, Palisade Corporation, Newfield, New York.
Rantz, S. E., et al. (1982). “Measurement and computation of streamflow Volume 1: Measurement of stage and discharge.” Geological survey water-supply paper 2175. United States Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
Tung, Y.-K., and Yen, B.-C. (2005). Hydrosystems engineering uncertainty analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
USEPA. (2000). “National water quality inventory: 1998 report to congress.” Rep. No. EPA841-R-00-001, Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
YSI, Incorporated. (2001). “Linearity/accuracy of conductivity sensors on YSI 6-Series sondes.” YSI technical note, 0201 T607, Yellow Springs, Ohio.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 134Issue 4April 2008
Pages: 247 - 258

History

Received: Jan 4, 2007
Accepted: Oct 24, 2007
Published online: Apr 1, 2008
Published in print: Apr 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jennifer Mueller Price, A.M.ASCE [email protected]
Graduate Research Assistant, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523. E-mail: [email protected]
Timothy K. Gates, M.ASCE [email protected]
Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share