TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 1, 2007

Improved Method for Aggregation of Water Quality Subindices

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 2

Abstract

Alternative methods to describe water quality using an aggregate index consisting of subindices for individual water quality variables are examined. Most aggregation methods suffer from three shortcomings: Ambiguity, eclipsing, and rigidity. Ambiguity problems exist when all the subindices indicate acceptable water quality for a given use, but the aggregated index does not. Eclipsing problems exist when the aggregated index fails to reflect poor water quality of one or more water quality variables. Rigidity problems exist when additional variables are included in the index to address specific water quality concerns, but the faulty aggregation function might artificially reduce the value of the water quality index such that it does not accurately reflect the true water quality. As the number of water quality variables increases, the magnitude of the aggregated index decreases raising the issue of ambiguity again. The writers developed a mathematical formulation for aggregate indices that avoids the problems of ambiguity, eclipsing, and rigidity with respect to the number of water quality variables required to be aggregated in a given index.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Bhargava, D. S. (1985). “Expression for drinking water supply standards.” J. Environ. Eng., 111(3), 304–316.
Brown, R. M., McClelland, N. I., Deininger, R. A., and Tozer, R. G. (1970). “A water quality index—Do we dare?” Water and Sewage Works, 117(10), 339–343.
Butkus, S., Hallock, D., Wiseman, C., and Jenifer Parsons, J. (2003). “Condition of fresh waters in Washington State for the Year 2002,” Technical Appendix, Washington Dept. of Ecology, Environmental Assessment Program, Publication No. 03-03-031, Olympia, Wash.
Cude, C. (1997). Oregon water quality index: Revision and application. Laboratory Division, Water Quality Monitoring Section, Oregon Dept. of Environmental Quality, Portland, Ore.
Cude, C. G. (2001). “Oregon water quality index: A tool for evaluating water quality management effectiveness.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 37(1), 125–137.
Cude, C. G. (2005). “Accommodating change of bacterial indicators in long term water quality datasets.” J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 41(1), 47–54.
Department of Natural Resources and Environment (DNRE). (1997). “An index of stream conditions.” Reference Manual, The State of Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Dinius, S. H. (1972). “Social accounting system for evaluating water resources.” Water Resour. Res., 8(5), 1159–1177.
Dinius, S. H. (1987). “Design of an index of water quality.” Water Resour. Bull., 23(5), 833–843.
Dojlido, J., Raniszewski, J., and Woyciechowska, J. (1994). “Water quality index–Application for rivers in the Vistula River basin in Poland.” Water Sci. Technol., 30(10), 57–64.
Dunnette, D. A. (1979). “A geographically variable water quality index used in Oregon.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 51(1), 53–61.
Environment Canada. (2004a). “Technical supplement to application and testing of the CCME Water Quality Index for selected water bodies in Atlantic Canada.” National Indicators and Reporting Orifice, Knowledge Integration Directorate, ⟨www.ec.gc.caa/soer-ree⟩, April 12, 2006.
Environment Canada. (2004b). “An assessment of the application and testing of the Water Quality Index of the Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment (CCME) for selected water bodies in Atlantic Canada: A discussion paper.” National Indicators and Reporting Office, Knowledge Integration Directorate ⟨www.ec.gc.caa/soer-ree⟩, April 12, 2006.
Flint, S. (2003). “Stream Health Index: An integrated streamflow and water quality index for small streams of the Assabet River watershed.” Concord, Mass. ⟨www.assabetriver.org/streamwatch/Stream Health Index (OAR-03-01).pdf⟩ (April 15, 2006).
Grafe, C. S. (2002). Idaho River ecological assessment framework: An integrated approach, Idaho Dept. of Environmental Quality, Boise, Id.
Hallock, D. (2002). “A water quality index for ecology’s stream monitoring program.” Washington Dept. of Ecology, Environmental Assessment Program, Publication No. 02-03-052, Olympia, Wash.
Horton, R. K. (1965). “An index number for rating water quality.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 37(3), 300–306.
House, M. A. (1989). “A water quality index for river management.” J. Inst. Water Environ. Manage., 3, 336–344.
House, M. A. (1990). “Water quality indices as indicators of ecosystem change.” Environ. Monit. Assess., 15, 255–263.
Ladson, A. R., and Doolan, J. (1997). “Integrated measures of river health.” Monitoring river health, River Management Society, Latrobe Univ., Melbourne, Australia.
Ladson, A. R., Doolan, J., White, L., Metzeling, L., and Robinson, D. (1996). “Index of stream condition as a tool to aid management of rivers.” Hydrology and Water Resources Symp., Institution of Engineers, Hobart, Australia.
Landwehr, J. M. (1979). “A statistical view of a class of water quality indices.” Water Resour. Res., 15(2), 460–468.
Landwehr, J. M., Deininger, R. A., McClelland, N. L., and Brown, R. M. (1974). “Discussion of ‘An objective water quality index,’ by Ralph D. Hakins.” J. Water Pollut. Control Fed., 46(7), 1804–1809.
Massachusetts Dept. of Environmental Protection (MDEP). (2002). Massachusetts year 2002 integrated list of waters. Part 1: Context and rationale for assessing and reporting the quality of Massachusetts surface waters, Division of Watershed Management, Worcester, Mass.
Mitchell, P. (1990). The environmental condition of Victorian streams, Dept. of Water Resources, Victoria, Australia.
Murphy, S., and Waterman, J. (2005). “Boulder area sustainability information network, water quality,” ⟨http://ben.boulder.co.us/basin/watershed/wqi info.html⟩ (April 15, 2006).
Office of the Commissioner for the Environment. (1988). State of the environment rep. 1988: Victoria’s inland waters, Government of Victoria, Victoria, Australia.
Oregon Progress Board. (2003). “Is Oregon Making Progress?” The 2003 benchmark performance report, Rep. to the Oregon Legislative Assembly, Oregon Progress Board, Salem, Ore.
Ott, W. R. (1978). Environmental quality indices: Theory and practice, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Pawley, A., Swanson, C., and Vorster, P. (2003). San Francisco Bay index 2003, The Bay Institute, Novato, Calif.
Peterson, R., and Bogue, B. (1989). Water quality index (used in environmental assessments), EPA Region 10, Seattle.
Prati, L., Pavenello, R., and Pesarin, R. (1971). “Assessment of surface water quality by single index of pollution.” Water Res., 5, 741–751.
Ramm, A. E. L., Cooper, J. A. G., Harrison, T. D., and Singh, R. A. (1994). “The estuarine health index: A new approach to scientific information transfer.” Proc., Joint South Africa/Australia Workshop: Classification of Rivers and Environmental Health Indicators, Water Research Commission, Rep. No. 63/94, Cape Town, South Africa.
Smith, D. G. (1990). “A better water quality indexing system for rivers and streams.” Water Res., 24(10), 1237–1244.
Summers, K., Copeland, R., Singleton, T., Upchurch, S., and Janicki, A. (1998). “Designing a comprehensive, integrated water resources monitoring program for Florida.” Proc., National Water-Quality Monitoring Council National Conference on Monitoring: Critical Foundations to Protect our Waters, Reno, Nev., 27–40.
Swamee, P. K., and Tyagi, A. (1999). “Formation of air pollution index.” J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 49(1), 88–91.
Swamee, P. K., and Tyagi, A. (2000). “Describing water quality with an aggregate index.” J. Environ. Eng., 126(5), 451–455.
Tilleard, J. W. (1986). “A statewide assessment of physical stream conditions in Victoria.” Hydrology and Water Resources Symp. The Institution of Engineers, Griffith Univ., Brisbane, Australia.
Walski, T. M., and Parker, F. L. (1974). “Consumers water quality index.” J. Envir. Engrg. Div., 100(3), 593–611.
Zandbergen, P. A., and Hall, K. J. (1998). “Analysis of the British Columbia Water Quality Index for watershed managers: A case study of two small watersheds.” Water Qual. Res. J. Canada, 33(4), 519–549.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133Issue 2February 2007
Pages: 220 - 225

History

Received: Jul 21, 2005
Accepted: Jul 14, 2006
Published online: Feb 1, 2007
Published in print: Feb 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Prabhata K. Swamee
Emeritus Fellow, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Roorkee 247 667, India
Aditya Tyagi, M.ASCE
P.E.
Senior Technologist, CH2M HILL, 12301 Research Blvd., Bldg. 4, Ste. 250, Austin, TX 78759. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share