TECHNICAL PAPERS
Nov 1, 2007

Liquid Sodium Ferrate and Fenton’s Reagent for Treatment of Mature Landfill Leachate

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133, Issue 11

Abstract

As landfills mature, biodegradable matter in leachate is consumed and remaining compounds are increasingly recalcitrant. In this work, ferrate was compared to Fenton’s reagent for the purpose of removing nonbiodegradable organic compounds from mature leachate. Oxidation conditions (time, pH, and dose) were optimized to yield maximum organic removal using two leachate samples from 20- and 12-year-old solid waste cells. Results from this study demonstrated that Ferrate and Fenton’s reagent had similar optimum pH ranges (3–5), but different organic removal capacities, ranging from 54 to 79% of initial leachate organic contents. An advantage of ferrate was that it was effective over a wide pH range. Advantages associated with Fenton’s reagent include that it had higher organic removal capacity, produced more oxidized organic compounds (measured as chemical oxygen demand/dissolved organic carbon), and produced more biodegradable byproducts (measured as chemical oxygen demand/5-day biochemical oxygen demand). Finally, both treatments were found to attack larger molecules (>1,000Dalton) , as indicated by an increase in smaller molecule contribution to organic carbon.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Acknowledgments

The writers would like to thank the William W. “Bill” Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management for funding this work. The writers also appreciate the help of Dr. Virender Sharma from Florida Institute of Technology for his help in ferrate synthesis and Ferrate Treatment Technologies, LLC, for providing reagents and equipment necessary for ferrate production.

References

Abbt-Braun, G., Lankes, U., and Frimmel, F. (2004). “Structural characterization of aquatic humic substances—The need for a multiple method approach.” Aquat. Sci., 66(2), 151–170.
Bae, J., Kim, S., and Chang, H. (1997). “Treatment of landfill leachates: Ammonia removal via nitrification and denitrification and further COD reduction via Fenton’s treatment followed by activated sludge.” Water Sci. Technol., 36(12), 341–348.
Christensen, J., Jensen, D., and Christensen, T. (1996). “Effect of dissolved organic carbon on the mobility of cadmium, nickel and zinc in leachate polluted groundwater.” Water Res., 30(12), 3037–3049.
DeLuca, S. J., Chao, A. C., and Smallwood, C., Jr. (1983). “Removal of organic priority pollutants by oxidation-coagulation.” J. Environ. Eng., 190(1), 36–46.
Ehrig, H. (1984). “Treatment of sanitary landfill leachate: Biological treatment.” Waste Manage. Res., 2(2), 131–152.
Graham, N., Jiang, C., Li, X., Jiang, J., and Ma, J. (2004). “The influence of pH on the degradation of phenol and chlorophenols by potassium ferrate.” Chemosphere, 56(10), 949–956.
Gu, B., Schmitt, J., Chen, Z., Liang, L., and McCarthy, J. (1994). “Adsorption and desorption of natural organic matter on iron oxide: Mechanisms and models.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 28(1), 38–46.
Jiang, J., and Wang, S. (2003). “Enhanced coagulation with potassium ferrate (VI) for removing humic substances.” Environ. Eng. Sci., 20(6), 627–633.
Kang, Y., and Hwang, K. (2000). “Effects of reaction conditions on the oxidation efficiency in the Fenton process.” Water Res., 34(10), 2786–2790.
Kerc, A., Bekbolet, M., and Saatci, A. (2004). “Effects of oxidative treatment on molecular size distribution of humic acids.” Water Sci. Technol., 49(4), 7–12.
Kim, S., Geissen, S., and Vogelpohl, A. (1997). “Landfill leachate treatment by a photoassisted Fenton reaction.” Water Sci. Technol., 35(4), 239–248.
Kjeldsen, P., Barlaz, M., Rooker, A., Baun, A., Ledin, A., and Christensen, T. (2002). “Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: A review.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(4), 297–336.
Lau, I. W. C., Wang, P., and Fang, H. H. P. (2001). “Organic removal of anaerobically treated leachate by Fenton coagulation.” J. Environ. Eng., 127(7), 666–669.
Lee, Y., Cho, M., Kim, J., and Yoon, J. (2004). “Chemistry of ferrate (Fe(VI)) in aqueous solution and its applications as a green chemical.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (Seoul, Repub. Korea), 10(1), 161–171.
Logan, B. E., and Jiang, Q. (1990). “Molecular size distributions of dissolved organic matter.” J. Environ. Eng., 116(6), 1046–1062.
Lopez, A., Pagano, M., Volpe, A., and Pinto, A. (2004). “Fenton’s pretreatment of mature landfill leachate.” Chemosphere, 54(7), 1005–1010.
MacCarthy, P. (2001). The principles of humic substances: An introduction to the first principle in: Humic substances structure, models and functions, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Thomas Graham House, Science Park, Cambridge, U.K.
Morais, J., and Zamora, P. (2005). “Use of advanced oxidation processes to improve the biodegradability of mature landfill leachates.” J. Hazard. Mater., B123, 181–186.
Perfiliev, Y., and Sharma, V. (2004). “Ferrate (VI) synthesis: Dry and wet methods.” Proc., Int. Symp. Innovative Ferrate Technology in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Institute of Chemical Technology, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pignatello, J., Oliveros, E., and MacKay, A. (2006). “Advanced oxidation processes for organic contaminant destruction based on Fenton reaction and related chemistry.” Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 32(1), 1–84.
Pinkernell, U., Nowack, B., Gallard, H., and Gunten, U. (2000). “Methods for the photometric determination of reactive bromine and chlorine species with ABTS.” Water Resour., 34(18), 4343–4350.
Qu, J.-H., Liu, H.-J., Liu, S.-X, and Lei, P. J. (2003). “Reduction of fulvic acid in drinking water by ferrate.” J. Environ. Eng., 129(1), 17–24.
Reckhow, D., Singer, P., and Malcom, R. (1990). “Chlorination of humic materials: Byproducts formation and chemical interpretations.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 24(11), 1655–1664.
Reinhart, D., and Al-Yousfi, A. (1996). “The impact of leachate recirculation on municipal solid waste landfill operating characteristics.” Waste Manage. Res., 14(4), 337–346.
Rivas, F., Beltran, F., Gimeno, O., Acedo, B., and Carvalho, F. (2003). “Stabilized leachates: Ozone-activated carbon treatment and kinetics.” Water Res., 37(20), 4823–4834.
Scott, J., and Ollis, D. (1995). “Integration of chemical and biological oxidation processes for water treatment: Review and recommendations.” Environ. Prog., 14(2), 88–103.
Sharma, V. K. (2002). “Potassium ferrate (VI): An environmentally friendly oxidant.” Adv. Environ. Res., 6(2), 143–156.
Singer, P., and Reckhow, D. (1998). “Chemical oxidation.” Water quality and treatment: A handbook of community water suppliers, 5th Ed., American Water Works Association, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Snoeyink, V. L., and Jenkins, D. (1980). Water chemistry, Wiley, New York.
Standard testing methods for the examination of water and wastewater. (1998). A. Eaton, L. Glesceri, and A. Greenberg, eds., 20th Ed., American Public Health Assoc., Washington, D.C.
Steensen, M. (1997). “Chemical oxidation for the treatment of leachate— Process comparison and results from full-scale plants.” Water Sci. Technol., 35(4), 249–256.
Tabrizi, G., and Mehrvar, M. (2004). “Integration of advanced oxidation technologies and biological processes: Recent developments, trends, and advances.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., A39(11–12), 3029–3081.
Tchobanoglous, G., Burton, F., and Stensel, H. (2003). Wastewater engineering treatment and reuse, Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Thompson, M., Ockerman, L. T., and Schreyer, J. M. (1951). “Preparation and purification of potassium ferrate (VI).” J. Am. Chem. Soc., 73, 1379–1381.
Walling, C. (1975). “Fenton’s reagent revisited.” Acc. Chem. Res., 8, 125–131.
Xing, H., Yuan, B., Wang, Y., and Qu, J. (2002). “Photocatalytic detoxification of microcystins combined with ferrate pretreatment.” J. Environ. Sci. Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 37(4), 641–649.
Yoon, J., Cho, Y., and Kim, S. (1998). “The characteristics of coagulation of Fenton’s reaction in the removal of landfill leachate organic compounds.” Water Sci. Technol., 38(2), 209–214.
Yoon, J., Kim, Y., Huh, J., Lee, Y., and Lee, D. (2002). “Roles of oxidation and coagulation in Fenton process for the removal of organics in landfill leachate.” J. Ind. Eng. Chem. (Seoul, Repub. Korea), 8(5), 410–418.
Zhang, H., Choi, H., and Huang, C. (2005). “Optimization of Fenton process for the treatment of landfill leachate.” J. Hazard. Mater., B125, 166–174.
Zhang, H., Choi, H., and Huang, C. (2006). “Treatment of landfill leachate by Fenton’s reagent in continuous stirred tank reactor.” J. Hazard. Mater., 136(3), 619–623.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 133Issue 11November 2007
Pages: 1042 - 1050

History

Received: Apr 26, 2006
Accepted: Apr 26, 2007
Published online: Nov 1, 2007
Published in print: Nov 2007

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Eyad S. Batarseh
Project Engineer, CDM Inc., 2301 Maitland Center Pkwy., Suite 300, Maitland, FL 32751 (corresponding author). E-mail: [email protected]
Debra R. Reinhart
Professor and Executive Associate Dean, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Central Florida, P.O. Box 162450, Orlando, FL 32816. E-mail: [email protected]
Luke Daly
CEO, Ferrate Treatment Technologies, LLC, 6432 Pine Castle Blvd., Suite C, Orlando, FL 32809. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share