TECHNICAL PAPERS
Oct 1, 2004

Natural Oxidant Demand of Aquifer Materials Using the Push-Pull Technique

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130, Issue 10

Abstract

The quantification of the natural oxidant demand (NOD) of aquifer materials is required to estimate the fate of reagents injected into contaminated aquifers during in situ chemical oxidation applications. Three push-pull tests were conducted at a horizontal spacing of 12–20 m within an uncontaminated region of the saturated zone in the Canadian Forces Base Borden aquifer located near Alliston, Ont., Canada to estimate the NOD for permanganate. Each test contacted a minimum of 270 kg of aquifer material. Upper estimates of NOD values from the three tests were 0.51–0.75 g/kg based on the initial mass of aquifer material contacted, and lower estimates were 0.29–0.42 g/kg based on additional aquifer material mass contacted during the drift or reaction phase. These results compared favorably to NOD values determined from bench-scale tests with high solids mass to solution volume ratios. If design and operational concerns can be overcome, the push-pull test offers significant advantages over the variety of bench-scale testing methods currently used to determine the NOD of aquifer materials.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Ball, W. P., Buehler, Ch., Harmon, T. C., Mackay, D. M., and Roberts, P. V. (1990). “Characterization of a sandy aquifer material at the grain scale.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 5, 253–295.
2.
Ball, W. P., and Roberts, P. V. (1991). “Long-term sorption of halogenated organic chemicals by aquifer material. 1. Equilibrium.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1223–1237.
3.
Barcelona, M. J., and Holm, T. R. (1991). “Oxidation-reduction capacities of aquifer solids.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1565–1572.
4.
Drescher, E., et al. ( 1998).“Batch and column testing to evaluate chemical oxidation of DNAPL source zones.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
5.
Gates-Anderson, D. D., Siegrist, R. L., and Cline, S. R. (2001). “Comparison of potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide as chemical oxidants for organically contaminated soils.” J. Environ. Eng., 127(4), 337–347.
6.
Gustafsson, O., Haghseta, F., Chan, C., MacFarlane, J., and Gschwend, P. M. (1997). “Quantification of the dilute sedimentary soot phase: Implications for PAH speciation and bioavailability.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 203–209.
7.
Haggerty, R., Schroth, M. H., and Istok, J. D. (1998). “Simplified method of “push-pull” test data analysis for determining in situ reaction rate coefficients.” Ground Water, 36(2), 314–324.
8.
Hall, S. H., Luttrell, S. P., and Cronin, W. E. (1991). “A method for estimating effective prorsity and ground-water velocity.” Ground Water, 29(2), 171–174.
9.
Hood, E.D. ( 2000). “Permanganate flushing of DNAPL source zones: Experimental and numerical investigation.” PhD thesis, Univ. of Waterloo, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Waterloo, Ont., Canada.
10.
Istok, J. D., Field, J. A., Schroth, M. H., Sawyer, T. E., and Humphrey, M. D. (1999). “Laboratory and field investigation of surfactant sorption using single-well, “push-pull” tests.” Ground Water, 37(4), 589–598.
11.
Istok, J. D., Humphrey, M. D., Schroth, M. H., Hyman, M. R., and O’Reilly, K. T. (1997). “Single-well, “push-pull” tests for in situ determination of microbial activities.” Ground Water, 35(4), 619–631.
12.
Mackay, D. M., Freyberg, D. L., Roberts, P. V., and Cherry, J. A. (1986). “A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer. 1. Approach and overview of plume movement.” Water Resour. Res., 22(13), 2017–2029.
13.
Miller, J.C., and Miller, J.N. ( 1993). Statistics for analytical chemistry, 3rd Ed., Ellis Horwood, New York.
14.
Mott-Smith, E., Leonard, W.G., Lewis, R., Clayton, W.S., Ramirez, J., Brown, R. ( 2000). “In situ oxidation of DNAPL using permanganate: IDC Cape Canaveral demonstration.” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
15.
Mumford, K.G., and Thomson, N.R. ( 2002). “Kinetic impact of natural oxidant demand on ISCO: A numerical investigation.” Proc., 1st Int. Conf. on Oxidation and Reduction Technologies for In-Situ Treatment of Soil and Groundwater, Niagara Falls, Canada, Redox Technologies, Inc., London, Ont., Canada.
16.
Mumford, K.G., Thomson, N.R., and Allen-King, R.M. ( 2002). “Investigating the kinetic nature of natural oxidant demand during ISCO.” Proc., 3rd Int. Conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
17.
Nelson, M. D., Parker, B. L., Al, T. A., Cherry, J. A., and Loomer, D. (2001). “Geochemical reaction resulting from in situ oxidation of PCE-DNAPL by KMnO4 in a sandy aquifer.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1266–1275.
18.
Nicholson, R. V., Cherry, J. A., and Reardon, E. J. (1983). “Migration of contaminants in groundwater at a landfill: A case study. 6, hydrogeochemistry.” J. Hydrol., 22, 131–176.
19.
Schnarr, M., Truax, C., Farquhar, G., Hood, E., Gonullu, T., and Stickney, B. (1998). “Laboratory and controlled field experiments using potassium permanganate to remediate trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene DNAPLs in porous media.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 29, 205–224.
20.
Siegrist, R.L., Urynowicz, M.A., West, O.R., Crimi, M.L., and Lowe, K.S. ( 2001). Principles and practices of in situ chemical oxidation using permanganate, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
21.
Starr, R. C., and Ingleton, R. A. (1992). “A new method for collecting core samples without a drilling rig.” Ground Water Monit. Rev., 12, 91–95.
22.
Stewart, R. ( 1965). “Oxidation with permanganate.” Oxidation in organic chemistry, K. B. Wiberg, ed., Academic, New York.
23.
Struse, A., Marvin, B.K., Harris, S.T., and Clayton, W.S. ( 2002). “Push pull tests: Field evaluation of in-situ chemical oxidation of high explosives at the Pantex Plant.” Proc., 3rd Int. conf. on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
24.
Thomson, N.R., Hood, E.D., and MacKinnon, L.K. ( 2000). “Source zone mass removal using permanganate: Expectations and potential limitations” Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Battelle, Columbus, Ohio.
25.
Tomich, J. F., Dalton, R. L., Jr., Deans, H. A., and Shallenberger, L. K. (1973). “Single-well tracer method to measure residual oil saturation.” JPT, 25, 211–218.
26.
Tomlinson, D., Thomson, N. R., Johnson, R. L., and Redman, D. (2003). “Air distribution in the Borden aquifer during in situ air sparging." J. Contam. Hydrol., 67, 113–132.
27.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (1998). “Field applications of in situ remediation technologies: Chemical oxidation. EPA542-R-98-008, Washington, D.C.
28.
Weber, W. J., McGinley, P. M., and Katz, L. E. (1992). “A distributed reactivity model for sorption and sediments. 1. Conceptual basis and equilibrium assessment.” Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 1955–1962.
29.
Yan, Y. E., and Schwartz, F. W. (1999). “Oxidative degradation and kinetics of chlorinated ethylenes by potassium permanganat.” J. Contam. Hydrol., 37, 343–365.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 130Issue 10October 2004
Pages: 1139 - 1146

History

Published online: Oct 1, 2004
Published in print: Oct 2004

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin G. Mumford
Geomatrix Consultants, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 4E7; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant in the Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1.
Coby S. Lamarche
Stantec Consulting Ltd., Kitchener ON, Canada N2B 3S4; formerly, Graduate Research Assistant in the Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1.
Neil R. Thomson, M.ASCE
Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo ON, Canada N2L 3G1. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share