TECHNICAL PAPERS
Apr 15, 2002

Standardized Membrane Pore Size Characterization by Polyethylene Glycol Rejection

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 128, Issue 5

Abstract

The objective of this research was to provide information toward standardization of a method for determining and describing the pore size distribution of ultrafiltration or nanofiltration membranes. Currently, pore size distribution testing is not standardized, making membrane selection to achieve treatment objectives difficult at best. The method utilized in this work provides a standard testing procedure as well as a pair of descriptors (P90 and the tightness coefficient) that provide needed information about the membrane pore sizes and pore size distribution. The method requires minimal equipment and no specialized knowledge. Determination of both P90 and the tightness coefficient allows direct comparison of mean pore size and pore size distribution of membranes on a standardized basis. The pore size distribution of three membranes was determined under varying solution and pressure conditions by measuring the solute rejection for various sizes of polyethylene glycol molecules in the range of 600 to 35,000 daltons. The method can be replicated and the results are independent of the process variables of pressure and solution characteristics within the region likely to be encountered in drinking water treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

Allgeier, S., and Summers, R. S.(1995). “Evaluating NF for DBP control with the RBSMT.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 87(3), 87–99.
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
Beerlage, M. A. M., Heijnen, M. L., Mulder, M. H. V., Smolders, C. A., and Strathmann, H.(1996). “Non-aqueous retention measurements: Ultrafiltration behaviour of polystyrene solutions and colloidal silver particles.” J. Membr. Sci., 113, 259–273.
Belfort, G., and Nagata, N.(1985). “Fluid mechanics and crossflow filtration: Some thoughts.” Desalination, 53, 57–59.
Berthouex, P. M., and Brown, L. C. (1994). Statistics for environmental engineers, Lewis, Boca Raton, Fla.
Bowles, J. E. (1979). Physical and geotechnical properties of soils, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Braghetta, A., and DiGiano, F. A. (1994). “Organic solute association with nanofiltration membrane surface: Influence of pH and ionic strength on membrane permeability.” Proc., 1994 AWWA Annual Conf., Denver.
Cleveland, C. T. (1999). “Determination of surface properties in spiral wound nanofiltration membranes,” MS thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, N.Y.
Cooper, A. R., and Van Derveer, D. S.(1979). “Characterization of ultrafiltration membranes by polymer transport measurements.” Sep. Sci. Technol., 14(6), 551–556.
Ferry, J. D.(1936). “Statistical evaluation of sieve constants in ultrafiltration.” J. Gen. Physiol., 20, 96–117.
Focke, W. W.(1983). “On the mechanism of transfer enhancement by eddy promoters.” Electrochim. Acta, 28(8), 1137–1146.
Fu, P., Ruiz, H., Thompson, K., and Spangenberg, C.(1994). “Selecting membranes for removing NOM and DBP precursors.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 86(12), 55–72.
Hazlett, J. D., Kutowy, O., and Tweddle, T. A. (1989). “Commercial ultrafiltration membrane performance evaluation.” Proc., 1989 National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, 65–69.
Holtz, R. D., and Kovacs, W. D. (1981). An introduction to geotechnical engineering, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
Jacangelo, J. G., Laı⁁né, J.-M., Cummings, E. W., Deutschmann, A., Mallevialle, J., and Weisner, M. R. (1994). Evaluation of ultrafiltration membrane pretreatment and nanofiltration of surface waters, AWWA Research Foundation and AWWA, Denver.
Jonsson, G.(1985). “Molecular weight cut-off curves for ultrafiltration membranes of varying pore sizes.” Desalination, 53, 3–10.
Jonsson, G., and Boesen, C. E.(1977). “Concentration polarization in a reverse osmosis test cell.” Desalination, 21, 1–10.
Kachalsky, L. A. (1994). “Experiences with microfiltration in the New York City watershed management program.” Proc., NWRI Microfiltration Water Treatment Symposium, NWRI, Ottawa.
Kang, I. S., and Chang, H. N.(1982). “The effect of turbulence promoters on mass transfer—numerical analysis and flow visualization.” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 25(8), 1167–1181.
Kulkarni, S. S., Funk, E. W., and Li, N. N. (1992). “Ultrafiltration.” Membrane handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
Laı⁁né, J.-M., Clark, M. M., and Mallevialle, J.(1989). “Effects of ultrafiltration membrane composition.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 82(11), 61–67.
Laı⁁né, J.-M., Jacangelo, J. G., Cummings, E. W., Carns, K. E., and Mallevialle, J.(1993). “Influence of bromide on low-pressure membrane filtration for controlling DBPs in surface waters.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 85(6), 87–99.
Miyashita, H., Hirano, S., and Wakabayashi, K.(1986). “Mechanism of enhancement of mass transfer at a wall using turbulence promoters separated from the wall.” Int. Chem. Eng., 26(3), 475–478.
Nakao, S., and Kimura, S.(1981). “Analysis of solute rejection in ultrafiltration.” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 14(1), 32–37.
Porter, M. C.(1972). “Concentration polarization with membrane ultrafiltration.” Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 11(3), 234–248.
Seacord, T. F. (1998). “Assessing nanofiltration membrane properties for water treatment applications.” MS thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, N.Y.
Taylor, J. S., Thompson, D. M., and Carswell, J. K.(1987). “Applying membrane processes to groundwater sources for trihalomethane precursors control.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 79(8), 72–82.
Tweddle, T. A., Baxter, A., and Kutowy, O. (1987). “Equipment and procedures for testing small coupon samples of RO and UF membranes.” Special National Research Council of Canada Rep. No. C-1144-875, Ottawa.
Urase, T., Yamamoto, S., and Ohgaki, S.(1994). “Effect of pore size distribution of ultrafiltration membranes on virus rejection in crossflow conditions.” Water Sci. Technol., 30(9), 199–208.
Vilker, V. L., Colton, C. K., and Smith, K. A.(1981). “Concentration polarization in protein UF: Part II. Theoretical and experimental study of albumin ultrafiltered in unstirred cell.” AIChE J., 27(4), 637–645.
Youm, K. H., and Kim, W. S.(1991). “Prediction of intrinsic pore properties of UF membrane by solute rejection curves: effects of operating conditions on pore properties.” J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 24(1), 1–7.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 128Issue 5May 2002
Pages: 399 - 407

History

Received: Jul 31, 2000
Accepted: Oct 25, 2001
Published online: Apr 15, 2002
Published in print: May 2002

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Christopher T. Cleveland, M.ASCE
Engineer, Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Dr., Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.
Thomas F. Seacord, M.ASCE
Engineer, Carollo Engineers, 12592 West Explorer Dr., Suite 200, Boise, ID 83713.
Amy K. Zander
Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Clarkson Univ., Potsdam, NY 13699-5710.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share