Exposure to Pesticides by Medium and Route: The 90th Percentile and Related Uncertainties
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 9
Abstract
Multiple route, multiple media distributions of exposure to chlorpyrifos and diazinon and associated uncertainties are investigated using the database generated by the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey in Arizona (NHEXAS-AZ). Exposure to pesticides and associated uncertainties may be estimated using either deterministic or probabilistic methods. This paper employs probabilistic models to estimate the 90th percentile of inhalation, dietary ingestion, dermal, and nondietary ingestion exposures to chlorpyrifos and diazinon. Questions associated with the uncertainty of exposure estimates for the two pesticides are also investigated. Probabilistic models are used to formulate distributions of exposures to each of the two pesticides for several subpopulation groups. Parameter uncertainties associated with the 90th and other percentiles of population and subpopulation groups are addressed in this paper. Highly exposed subpopulations have been defined as those with route-specific 90th percentile exposure that is higher than the population 90th percentile. All subjects exposed to levels above the 90th percentile of inhalation exposure live in dwellings with carpeting covering over 50% of their floor areas. The relative uncertainty of the 90th percentile of dermal exposure is larger than corresponding uncertainties for inhalation, dietary ingestion, and nondietary exposure.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bogen, K. T. ( 1990). Uncertainty in environmental risk assessment, Garland, New York.
2.
Bogen, K. T. ( 1995). “Methods to approximate joint uncertainty and variability in risk.” Risk. Anal., 15, 411–419.
3.
Callahan, M. A., Clinker, R. P., Whitmore, R. W., Kalton, G., and Sexton, K. ( 1995). “Overviews of important design issues for a national exposure assessment survey.” J. Expos. Anal. Envir. Epidemiology, 5(3), 257–282.
4.
Canover, W. J. ( 1980). Practical nonparametric statistics, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
5.
Cullen, A. C., and Frey, H. C. ( 1999). Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: A handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs, Plenum, New York.
6.
Currie, K. L., and McDonald, E. C. ( 1990). “Concentration of diazinon, chlorpyrifos, and bendiocarb after application in offices.” Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 51(1), 23–27.
7.
Doull, J., Klaassen, C. D., and Amdur, M. O. ( 1980). Casarett and Doull's toxicology: The basic science of poisons, 2nd Ed., Macmillan, New York, 366–371.
8.
Federal Register. (1992). 57(No. 104), 22888–22938.
9.
Gordon, S. M., et al. ( 1999). “Residential environmental measurements in the human exposure assessment survey (NHEXAS) pilot study in Arizona: Preliminary results for pesticides and VOCs.” J. Expos. Anal. Envir. Epidemiology, 9, 456–470.
10.
Hawley, J. K. ( 1985). “Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil.” Risk Anal., 5, 289–302.
11.
Hodgson, E., and Levi, P. E. ( 1996). “Pesticides: An important but underused model for the environmental health sciences.” Envir. Health Perspectives, 104(Suppl. 1), 97–104.
12.
Hoffman, F. O., and Hammonds, J. S. ( 1994). “Propagation of uncertainty in risk assessments: The need to distinguish between uncertainty due to lack of knowledge and uncertainty due to variability.” Risk Anal., 14(5), 707–712.
13.
Lebowitz, M. D., O'Rourke, M. K., Gordon, S., Moschandreas, D. J., and Buckley, T. ( 1995). “Population-based exposure measurements in Arizona: A phase I field study in support of the national human exposure assessment survey.” J. Expos. Anal. Envir. Epidemiology, 5, 297–325.
14.
Lemus, R., Abdelghani, A. A., Akers, T. G., and Horner, W. E. ( 1997). “Potential health risks from indoor exposure to chlorpyrifos (O,O-diethyl O-[3,5,6-Trichloro-2-Pyridyl] Phosphorothioate).” Rev. on Envir. Health, 12(2), 91–97.
15.
Lewis, R. G., Fortmann, R. C., and Camann, D. E. ( 1994). “Evaluation of methods for monitoring the potential exposure of small children to pesticides in the residential environment.” Arch. Envir. Contam. Toxicol., 26, 37–46.
16.
Lu, C., and Fenske, R. A. ( 1998). “Air and surface chlorpyrifos residues following residential broadcast and aerosol pesticide applications.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 32, 1388–1390.
17.
MacIntosh, D. L., Xue, J., Ozkaynak, H., Spengler, J. D., and Ryan, P. B. ( 1995). “A population-based exposure model for benzene.” J. Expos. Anal. Envir. Epidemiology, 5(3), 375–403.
18.
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M. ( 1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis, Cambridge University Press, New York.
19.
Moschandreas, D. J., et al. ( 2001). “Occurrence and distributions of residential exposure to chlorpyrifos and diazinon.” J. Atmospheric Envir., 35(12), 2201–2213.
20.
Mukerjee, S., et al. ( 1997). “An environmental scoping study in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of TEXAS-III. Residential microenvironmental monitoring for air, house dust, and soil.” Envir. Int., 23(5), 657–673.
21.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). ( 1991). Human exposure assessment for airborne pollutants: Advances and opportunities, Washington, D.C.
22.
Ott, W. R. ( 1995). Environmental statistics and data analysis, CRC, Boca Raton, Fla.
23.
Richardson, R. J. ( 1995). “Assessment of the neurotoxic potential of chlorpyrifos relative to other organophosphorus compounds: A critical review of the literature.” J. Toxicol. Envir. Health, 44, 135–165.
24.
Sexton, K., Callahan, M. A., Bryan, E. F., Saint, C. G., and Wood, W. P. ( 1995). “Informed decisions about protecting and promoting public health: Rationale for a national human exposure assessment.” J. Expos. Anal. Envir. Epidemiology, 5(3), 233–256.
25.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1986). Human health effects literature search and data evaluation for chlorpyrifos, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Criteria and Standards Division, Washington, D.C.
26.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1990a). Exposure factors handbook, No. EPA/600/8-89/043, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.
27.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1990b). “National household pesticide exposure study (NOPES), EPA 600/3-90/003.” Washington, D.C.
28.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1993a). Health advisories for drinking water contaminants, Office of Water Health Advisories, Washington, D.C.
29.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1997a). “Exposure factors handbook, EPA/600/P-95/002Fa-c.” Office of Research and Development, Washington, D.C.
30.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1997b). “Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis, EPA/630/R-97/001.” Washington, D.C.
31.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 2000). “Chlorpyrifos revised risk assessment and agreement with registrants.” Prevention, pesticides, and toxic substances, Washington, D.C.
32.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of Research and Development. ( 1993b). Research solicitation: Human exposure assessment, Washington, D.C.
33.
World Health Organization (WHO). ( 1998). Environmental health criteria 198-diazinon, Geneva.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 9 • September 2001
Pages: 857 - 864
History
Received: Apr 19, 2000
Published online: Sep 1, 2001
Published in print: Sep 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.