Spatial Distribution of Extracellular Polymeric Substances in Biofilms
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 9
Abstract
This study investigated the spatial distribution of biofilm extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) with depth in biofilms. Heterotrophic biofilms were grown in a rotating drum biofilm reactor fed with synthetic wastewater with a COD of 150 mg/L. Biofilm was found to be heterogeneously structured, represented not only by the spatial distribution of EPS yields but also by clearly defined aerobic/anoxic zones, increased density, decreased porosity, decreased soluble COD concentrations, and decreased viable biomass concentrations along the biofilm depth. Thicker biofilms exhibited greater soluble COD concentrations, EPS yields, and viable biomass than thinner biofilms. The net EPS yields in the biofilms are proportionally related to the amount of viable biomass present, and viable biomass loses its ability to produce EPS at the deeper sections because of its lower microbial activity resulting from lower nutrient availability. Also, it is possible that the naturally produced EPS was consumed as a substrate in the deeper layers, where more readily degradable organics were absent. The results of the spatial distribution of EPS yields gained in this paper provide helpful information to achieve a more complete description of heterogeneous biofilm structure. New biofilm models need to be developed to incorporate the EPS information to accurately reflect the heterogeneity of biofilms.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bishop, P. L., and Yu, T. ( 1998). “Stratification of microbial metabolic processes and redox potential change in an aerobic biofilm studied using microelectrodes.” Water Sci. and Technol., 37(4/5), 195–198.
2.
Bradford, M. M. ( 1976). “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.” Analytical Biochemistry, 72, 248–254.
3.
Characklis, W. G., and Marshall, K. C. ( 1990). Biofilms, Wiley, New York.
4.
de Beer, D., and Schramm, A. ( 1999). “Micro-environments and mass transfer phenomena in biofilms studied with microsensors.” Water Sci. and Technol., 39(7), 173–178.
5.
Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., and Greenberg, A. E., eds. ( 1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
6.
Findlay, R. H., King, G. M., and Watling, L. ( 1989). “Efficiency of the phospholipid analysis in determining microbial biomass in sediments.” Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 55(11), 2888–2893.
7.
Fu, Y.-C. ( 1993). “Characterizing oxygen profiles and determining oxygen diffusivity in biofilm during biodegradation of azo dye.” PhD thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
8.
Gerhardt, P., Murray, R. G. E., Wood, W. A., and Krieg, N. R. ( 1994). Methods for general and molecular bacteriology, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
9.
Harmer, C. ( 1991). “Factors affecting secondary utilization kinetics of azo dye in wastewater biofilms.” MS thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
10.
Jiang, H. ( 1994). “Factors affecting azo dye degradation in wastewater biofilms.” MS thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
11.
Kristensen, G., and Jansen, J. ( 1980). “Fixed film kinetics-description of laboratory equipment.” Dept. of Sanitary Engrg., Technical University of Denmark.
12.
Lazarova, V., and Manem, J. ( 1995). “Biofilm characterization and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment.” Water Res., 29(10), 2227–2245.
13.
Mason, C. A., Bryers, J. D., and Hamer, G. ( 1986). “Activity, death and lysis during microbial growth in a chemostat.” Chem. Eng. Commun., 45, 163–176.
14.
Metcalf and Eddy. ( 1991). Wastewater engineering treatment, disposal, and reuse, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 775–776.
15.
Tepper, A. ( 1997). “Aerobic azo dye degradation by Sphingomonas isolates in wastewater treatment biofilms.” MS thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
16.
Zhang, T. C., and Bishop, P. L. ( 1994). “Density, porosity, and pore structure of biofilms.” Water Res., 28(11), 2267–2277.
17.
Zhang, X. ( 1999). “Biofilm extracellular polymeric substances—Methodology development, spatial distribution and property investigation.” PhD thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
18.
Zhang, X., and Bishop, P. L. ( 2000). “Biofilm extracellular polymeric substances biodegradability study.” Proc., 1st World Congr. of Int. Water Assn.
19.
Zhang, X., Bishop, P. L., and Kinkle, B. K. ( 1999). “Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms.” Water Sci. and Technol., 39(7), 212–218.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 9 • September 2001
Pages: 850 - 856
History
Received: Mar 22, 2000
Published online: Sep 1, 2001
Published in print: Sep 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.