Physical and Biological Performance of Self-Inoculated UASB Reactor Treating Raw Domestic Sewage
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 2
Abstract
The dynamics of a self-inoculated upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor treating raw sewage has been studied. The results suggest two types of start-up periods. During the first 6 weeks of operation, the reactor achieved a removal efficiency of up to 65% of total chemical oxygen demand (COD) and 73% of suspended solids. During this primary start-up period, the removal of organic matter was mainly due to interception in the reactor. The second start-up period expressed by biogas release was reached after 14 weeks. An intermediary period between these two start-up periods was characterized by a slight drop of pH and increase of volatile fatty acid in the effluent. The long time to reach the second start-up period seemed to be responsible for the large discrepancy between removed COD and recovered biogas (107 mL/g COD removed). It is thus suggested that process optimization should focus on shortening the time needed to reach the second start-up period. A model that represents a possible description of the process dynamics of self-inoculated UASB reactors is proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Aiba, S., Shoda, M., and Nagatani, M. ( 1968). “Kinetics of product inhibition in alcohol fermentation.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 10, 845–864.
2.
American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). ( 1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.
3.
Barbosa, A., and Sant'Anna, G. L., Jr. ( 1989). “Treatment of raw domestic sewage in an UASB reactor.” Water Res., 23(12), 1483–1490.
4.
Bitton, G. ( 1999). Wastewater microbiology, 2nd Ed., Wiley-Liss, New York.
5.
Brito, A. G., and Melo, L. F. ( 1997). “A simplified analysis of reaction and mass transfer in UASB and EGSB reactors.” Envir. Technol., London, 18, 35–44.
6.
Crowther, R. F., and Harkness, N. ( 1975). “Anaerobic bacteria.” Ecological aspects of used-water treatment, C. R. Curds and H. A. Hawkes, eds., Academic, London, 65–91.
7.
Dinopoulou, G., Rudd, T., and Lester, J. N. ( 1988). “Anaerobic acidogenesis of a complex wastewater: I. The influence of operational parameters on reactor performance.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 31, 958–968.
8.
Draaijer, H., Maas, J. A. W., Schaapman, J. E., and Khan, A. ( 1992). “Performance of the 5 MLD UASB reactor for sewage treatment at Kampur, India.” Water Sci. and Technol., 25(7), 123–133.
9.
Edeline, F. ( 1997). “L'épuration physico-chimique des eaux, théorie et technologie.” Liège, CEBEDOC, ed. (in French).
10.
Eng, S. C., Fernandes, X. A., and Paskins, A. R. ( 1986). “Biochemical effects of administering schock loads of sucrose to a laboratory-scale anaerobic (UASB) effluent treatment plant.” Water Res., 20(6), 789–794.
11.
García, E. P. A., Rodriguez, R., Fernández, N., and Fdz-Polanco, F. ( 1998). “Domestic sewage treatment with a two-stage anaerobic reactor.” Proc., Int. Wimek Congr. on Options for Closed Water Sys.—Sustainable Water Mgmt., Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
12.
Gnanadipathy, A., and Polpraesert, C. ( 1993). “Treatment of domestic wastewater with UASB reactor.” Water Sci. and Technol., 27(1), 195–203.
13.
Grin, R. C., Roersma, R., and Lettinga, G. ( 1983). “Anaerobic treatment of raw sewage at lower temperatures.” Proc., Eur. Symp. on Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment, W. J. Van Den Brink, ed., 335–347.
14.
Kalogo, Y., and Verstraete, W. ( 1999). “Development of anaerobic sludge bed (ASB) reactor technologies for domestic wastewater treatment: Motives and perspectives.” World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 15, 523–534.
15.
Lettinga, G., Van Velsen, A. F. M., Hobma, S. W., De Zeeuw, W., and Klapwijk, A. ( 1980). “Use of the upflow sludge blanket (USB) reactor concept for biological wastewater treatment, especially for anaerobic treatment.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 22, 699–734.
16.
Lettinga, G., et al. ( 1993). “Anaerobic treatment of domestic sewage and wastewater.” Water Sci. and Technol., 27(9), 67–73.
17.
Schellinkhout, A., and Osorio, E. ( 1994). “Long term experience with the UASB technology for sewage treatment on large scale.” Proc., Int. Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion, R. S. A. Litho, ed., 251–252.
18.
Tare, V., Mansoor, A. M., and Jawed, M. ( 1997). “Biomethanation in domestic and industrial waste treatment—An Indian scenario.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Anaerobic Digestion, Vol. 2, Pergamon, Tarrytown, N.Y., 255–262.
19.
Thaveesri, J., Liessens, B., and Verstraete, W. ( 1995). “Granular sludge growth under different reactor liquid surface tensions in lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating wastewater from sugar beet processing.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 43, 1122–1127.
20.
Valcke, D., and Verstraete, W. ( 1983). “A practical method to estimate the acetoclastic methanogenic biomass in anaerobic sludges.” J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 55, 1191–1195.
21.
Van Haandel, A. C., and Lettinga, G. ( 1994). Anaerobic sewage treatment. A practical guide for regions with a hot climate, Wiley, New York.
22.
Wang, K. ( 1994). “Integrated anaerobic and aerobic treatment of sewage.” PhD thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 2 • February 2001
Pages: 179 - 183
History
Received: Jan 2, 2000
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.