Verification of Anaerobic Biofilm Model for Phenol Degradation with Sulfate Reduction
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 2
Abstract
A mathematical model was developed to describe phenol degradation with sulfate reduction in an anaerobic biofilm process. The model incorporates the mechanisms of diffusive mass transport and Monod kinetics. The model was solved using a combination of the orthogonal collocation method and Gear's method. A pilot-scale column reactor was conducted to verify the model. The batch kinetic tests were independently conducted to determine nine biokinetic coefficients used in the model while shear loss and initial thickness of the biofilm were assumed so that the model simulated the substrate concentration results very well. The removal efficiencies for phenol and sulfate are 98 and 88%, respectively. At a steady-state condition, the experimental data of phenol and sulfate concentrations were higher than those obtained from the model. The reason was that the effect of shear loss became significant as the biofilm grew thicker. The higher shear loss resulted in the more-suspended biomass. The suspended biomass decomposed and released soluble microbial products which increased the substrate effluent concentrations. The procedures presented in this paper could be employed for the design of anaerobic biofilm reactor systems for the biodegradation of multiple substrates.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Chapelle, F. H. ( 1993). Groundwater microbiology and geochemistry, Wiley, New York.
2.
Cheng, H. T., and Rittmann, R. E. ( 1987a). “Mathematical modeling of biofilm on activated carbon.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 21, 273–279.
3.
Cheng, H. T., and Rittmann, R. E. ( 1987b). “Verification of the model of biofilm on activated carbon.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 21, 280–288.
4.
Cussler, E. L. ( 1984). Diffusion: Mass transfer in fluid systems, New York.
5.
Finnegan, S. M. ( 1994). “Anaerobic digestion of sulfate-containing wastewaters from citric acid production.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Microbiology, University College, Galway, Ireland.
6.
Ingvorsen, K., Zehnder, A. J. B., and Jørgensen, B. B. ( 1984). “Kinetics of sulphate and acetate uptake by Desulfobacter postgatei.” Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 46, 403–408.
7.
Li, Y. Y., Fang, H. H. P., Chen, T., and Chui, H. K. (1995). “UASB treatment of wastewater containing concentrated benzoate.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 121(10), 748–751.
8.
Maillacheruvu, K. Y., and Parkin, G. F. ( 1994). “Kinetic of growth, substrate utilization, and sulfide toxicity for propionate, acetate, and hydrogen utilizers in anaerobic systems.” Proc., 67th Annu. Conf. and Exposition.
9.
Maree, J. P., Hulse, G., Dods, D., and Schutte, C. E. ( 1991). “Pilot plant studies on biological sulphate removal from industrial effluent.” Water Sci. and Technol., 23, 1293–1300.
10.
Maree, J. P., and Strydom, W. F. ( 1985). “Biological sulphate removal in an upflow packed bed reactor.” Water Res., 19, 1101–1106.
11.
Namkung, E., and Rittmann, B. E. ( 1986). “Soluble microbial products (SMP) formation kinetics by biofilms.” Water Res., 20, 795–806.
12.
Suidan, M. T., and Wang, Y. T. (1985). “Unified analysis of biofilm kinetics.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 111(5), 634–646.
13.
Wang, Y. T. ( 1984). “Modeling of biological activity in expanded-bed, anaerobic-activated carbon filters.” PhD dissertation, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Ill.
14.
Wen, T. C., Cheng, S. S., and Lay, J. J. ( 1994). “A kinetic model of a recirculated upflow anaerobic sludge blanket treating phenolic wastewater.” Water Envir. Res., 66, 794–799.
15.
Widdel, F., and Pfennig, N. ( 1977). “A new anaerobic, sporing, acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing bacterium, Desulfotomaculum acetoxidans.” Archives of Microbiology, 112, 119–122.
16.
Wilke, C. E., and Chang, P. ( 1955). “Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions.” AIChE J., 1, 264–270.
17.
Williamson, K., and McCarty, P. L. ( 1976a). “A model of substrate utilization by bacterial films.” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 48, 9–24.
18.
Williamson, K., and McCarty, P. L. ( 1976b). “Verification studies of the biofilm model for bacterial substrate utilization,” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 48, 281–296.
19.
Yoda, M., Kitagawa, M., and Miyaji, Y. ( 1987). “Long-term competition between sulfate-reducing and methane-producing bacteria for acetate in anaerobic biofilm.” Water Res., 21, 1547–1556.
20.
Young, L. Y., and Rivera, M. D. ( 1985). “Methanogenic degradation of four phenolic compounds.” Water Res., 19, 1325–1332.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127 • Issue 2 • February 2001
Pages: 119 - 125
History
Received: Jun 30, 1998
Published online: Feb 1, 2001
Published in print: Feb 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.