Enivronmental Engineers Must Play a Role in Smart-Growth Development Strategies
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 127, Issue 12
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G. ( 1998). Why smart growth: A primer, International City/County Management Association, Washington, D.C.
2.
Arnold, C. L., Jr. and Gibbons, C. J. ( 1996). “Impervious surface coverage: The emergence of a key environmental indicator.” J. American Plng. Assoc., 62(2), 243–258.
3.
Bae, C.-H. C., and Richardson, H. W. ( 1994). “Automobiles, the environment and metropolitan spatial structure.” Working papers, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Mass.
4.
Chen, D. D. T. ( 2000). “The science of smart growth.” Scientific American, 283(6), 84–91.
5.
Criterion Inc., and Apogee Research Inc. ( 1998). The transportation and environmental impacts of infill versus greenfield development: A comparative case study analysis, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Urban and Economic Development Division, Washington, D.C.
6.
DeSena, M. ( 1999). “`Smart Growth' designed to solve urban sprawl-related problems.” Water Environment & Technol., 11(4), 28–33.
7.
Downs, A. ( 2001). “What does `Smart Growth' really mean?” Planning, 67(4), 20–25.
8.
Ewing, R. ( 1997). “Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable?” J. American Plng. Assoc., 63(1), 107–126.
9.
Logan, B. E., O'Melia, C. R., and Rittmann, B. E. ( 1998). “Research frontiers in environmental engineering.” National Science Foundation and Association of Environmental Engineering Professors, Champaign, Ill., 1–13.
10.
Maryland Office of Planning. ( 1998). Smart growth options for Maryland's tributary strategies, Maryland Office of Planning, Baltimore, Md.
11.
O'Neill, D. ( 1999). Smart growth: Myth and fact, ULI-the Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C.
12.
Pelley, J. ( 1999). “Building smart-growth communities.” Envir. Sci. & Technol., 33(1), 28A–32A.
13.
South Carolina Coastal Conservation League (SCCCL). ( 1995). “Getting a rein on runoff: How sprawl and the traditional town compared.” SCCCL Land Development Bulletin, Fall (7), 1–8.
14.
U.S. Congress, and Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). ( 1995). “The technological reshaping of metropolitan America.” OTA-ETI-643, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
15.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1996). “The national water quality inventory report to congress.” Rep. No. 305(b), Washington, D.C.
16.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1999a). “Antidotes to sprawl: Air pollution.” USEPA, Region, 5, Sustainable urban environments, 〈http://www.epa.gov/region5/sprawl/airpollution.htm〉 (Sept. 16, 2001).
17.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 1999b). “Antidotes to sprawl: Nonpoint source water pollution.” USEPA, Region 5, Sustainable urban environments, 〈http://www.epa.gov/region5/sprawl/nonpoint.htm〉 (Sept. 16, 2001).
18.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). ( 2001). “Why should we be concerned about sprawl.” USEPA, Region 5, Sustainable urban environments, 〈http://www.epa.gov/region5/air/sue/sprawl.htm〉 (Sept. 16, 2001).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Dec 1, 2001
Published in print: Dec 2001
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.