TECHNICAL PAPERS
Feb 1, 2000

Aldicarb Transport in Subsurface Environment: Comparison of Models

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 126, Issue 2

Abstract

In this paper, two different pesticide transport simulation models are presented and compared to carry out preliminary analysis on the applicability of those models in determining ground-water vulnerability to aldicarb contamination. The first model is a physically based analytical model that simulates 1D pesticide movement in soils, based on the concept of complete mixing and 2D advective-dispersive transport in the aquifer. The second model is a numerical simulation model that links the existing numerical codes PRZM2, MODFLOW, and MT3D to simulate pesticide transport in the subsurface. The concentrations of aldicarb residues in soil and in the aquifer calculated by the two models are found to be in good agreement. However, the analytical model tends to produce an earlier arrival of the peak concentration in each year due to the assumption of complete mixing. It is also found that the infiltrating water following aldicarb application plays a significant role on the leaching potential of aldicarb, which is also affected by various meteorological and hydrological factors as well as by agricultural practices.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Bear, J. (1979). Hydraulics of groundwater. Elsevier Science, New York.
2.
Beltman, W. H. J., Boesten, J. J. T. I., and van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M. (1995). “Analytical modeling of pesticide transport from the soil surface to a drinking water well.” J. Hydrol., Amsterdam, 169, 209–228.
3.
Beltman, W. H. J., Boesten, J. J. T. I., van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., and Quist, J. J. (1996). “Analytical modeling of effects of application frequency on pesticide concentrations in wells. Ground Water, 34, 470–479.
4.
Boesten, J. J. T. I., and van der Linden, A. M. A. (1991). “Modeling the influence of sorption and transformation on pesticide leaching and persistence.” J. Envir. Quality, 20, 425–435.
5.
BOSS GMS—user's manual. (1996). BOSS international and Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
6.
Briggs, G. G., Bromilow, R. H., and Evans, A. A. (1982). “Relationship between lipophilicity and root uptake and translocation of nonionised chemicals by barley.” Pestic. Sci., 13, 495–504.
7.
Carsel, R. F., Smith, C. N., Mulkey, L. A., Dean, J. D., and Jowise, P. (1984). User's manual for the pesticide root zone model (PRZM): Release 1, EPA-600/3-84-109, U.S. EPA, Athens, Ga.
8.
Dean, J. D., Huyakorn, P. S., Donigian, A. S., Voss, K. A., Schanz, R. W., Meeks, Y. T., and Carsel, R. F. (1989). Risk of unsaturated/saturated transport and transformation of chemical concentrations (RUSTIC). Vol. 1: Theory and code verification, EPA-600/3-89/048a, U.S. EPA. Athens, Ga.
9.
Fetter, C. W. (1988). Applied hydrogeology, 2nd Ed., Merrill Publishing Co., A Bell & Howell Information Co., Columbus, Ohio.
10.
Flury, M. (1996). “Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils—a review.” J. Envir. Quality, 25, 25–45.
11.
Hantush, M. M., and Mariño, M. A. (1996). “An analytical model for the assessment for pesticide exposure levels in soils and groundwater.” Envir. Modeling and Assessment, 1(4), 263–276.
12.
Johnson, J. A., Ravi, V., and Rumery, J. K. (1994). “Estimation of solute concentrations using the pathline counting method.” Ground Water, 32(5), 719–726.
13.
Jones, R. L. ( 1986). Field, laboratory, and modeling studies on the degradation and the transport of aldicarb residues in soil and ground water. W. Y. Garner, R. C. Honeycutt, and H. N. Nigg, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 197–218.
14.
Jones, R. L., and Estes, T. L. (1995). “Summary of aldicarb monitoring and research programs in the U.S.A.” J. Contaminant Hydro., 18, 107–140.
15.
Jury, W. A., and Gruber, J. (1989). “A stochastic analysis of the influence of soil and climatic variability on the estimate of pesticide groundwater pollution potential.” Water Resour. Res., 25, 2465–2474.
16.
Jury, W. A., Spencer, W. F., and Farmer, W. J. (1983). “Behavior assessment model for trace organics in soil: I. Model description.” J. Envir. Quality, 12, 558–564.
17.
Leonard, R. A., Knisel, W. G., and Still, D. A. (1987). “GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems.” Trans. ASAE, 30, 1403–1418.
18.
Lorber, M. N., and Offutt, C. K. ( 1986). “A model for the assessment of ground water contamination potential.” Evaluation of pesticides in ground water, W. Y. Garner, R. C. Honeycutt, and H. N. Nigg, eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 342–365.
19.
McDonald, M. G., and Harbaugh, A. W. (1992). A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. Scientific Publications Co., Washington, D.C.
20.
Mullins, J. A., Carsel, R. F., Scarbrough, J. E., and Ivery, A. M. (1993). PRZM-2, a model for predicting pesticide fate in the crop root and unsaturated soil zones: Users manual for release 2.0. U.S. EPA.
21.
Parrish, R. S., Smith, C. N., and Fong, F. K. (1992). “Test of the pesticide root zone model and the aggregate model for transport and transformation of aldicarb, metolachlor, and bromide.” J. Envir. Quality, 21, 685–697.
22.
Pease, William S., Albright, D., DeRoos, C., Gottsman, L., Kyle, A. D., Morello-Frosch, R., and Robinson, J. C. (1995). “Pesticide contamination of groundwater in California.” University of California, Berkeley, Calif.
23.
Rengam, S., and Snyder, K. ( 1991). The pesticide handbook: Profiles for action, 3rd Revised Ed., International Organization of Consumers Unions (IOCU) and Pesticide Action Network (PAN), Penang, Malaysia, 12.
24.
Reynolds, J. W., and Spruill, R. K. (1995). “Ground-water simulation for management of a regulated aquifer system: A case study in the North Carolina Coastal Plain.” Ground Water, 33(5), 741–748.
25.
Suntio, L. R., Shiu, W. Y., Mackay, D., Seiber, J. N. and Glotfelty, D. (1988). “Critical review of Henry's law constants for pesticides.” Rev. of Envir. Contamination and Toxicology, 103, 1–59.
26.
Varshney, P., Tim, U. S., and Anderson, C. E. (1993). “Risk-based evaluation of ground-water contamination by agricultural pesticides.” Ground Water, 31, 356–362.
27.
van der Zee, S. E. A. T. M., and Boesten, J. J. T. I. (1991). “Effects of soil heterogeneity on pesticide leaching to groundwater.” Water Resour. Res., 27, 3051–3063.
28.
Wagenet, R. J., and Hutson, J. L. (1989). LEACHM: Leaching estimation and chemistry model. Vol. 2. Version 2. Continuum Water Resources Inst., Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
29.
Zheng, C. (1992). MT3D, a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems. S. S. Papadopulos & Associates, Inc. Md.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 126Issue 2February 2000
Pages: 121 - 129

History

Received: Mar 2, 1999
Published online: Feb 1, 2000
Published in print: Feb 2000

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Member, ASCE
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resour., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616; corresponding author. E-mail: xchu@ ucdavis.edu
Grad. Res. Asst., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Prof., Dept. of Land, Air and Water Resour. and Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Univ. of California, Davis, CA.
Prof., Dept. of Civ. Engrg., Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share