Comparison of Pollutant Removal Efficiency for Two Residential Storm Water Basins
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 7
Abstract
Detention basins with a low-flow concrete channel or a vegetated channel are two types of storm water collection basins examined in this study to assess effectiveness in water quality improvement. Influent and effluent data collected from four storm events include flow, petroleum hydrocarbons, nutrients, total suspended solids, three major ions, and indicator organisms. The calculation of influent and effluent mass loading for each basin determines the removal efficiency, which is used to rank the more effective basin for water quality improvement. As expected, the detention basin with a low-flow concrete channel was found to be ineffective for improving the water quality of storm water. The vegetated detention basin was also found essentially ineffective for water quality improvement for all four storms, with low influent mass loading and flushing of stored water the most probable reasons for this result.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Amandes, C. B., and Bedient, P. B. (1980). “Stormwater detention in developing watersheds.”J. Envir. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 106(2), 403–419.
2.
Ferrara, R. A., and Witkowski, P. (1983). “Stormwater quality characteristics in detention basins.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 109(2), 428–447.
3.
Holler, J. D. (1989). “Storm water detention basin nutrient removal efficiency.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE 115(1), 52–63.
4.
Kantrowitz, I. H., and Woodham, W. M. (1995). “Efficiency of a stormwater detention pond in reducing loads of chemical and physical constituents in urban streamflow, Pinellas County, Florida.” Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 94-4217, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
5.
Kluesner, J. W., and Lee, G. F. (1974). “Nutrient loading from a separate storm sewer in Madison, Wisconsin.” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 46(5), 920–936.
6.
Latimer, J. S., Mills, G. L., Hoffman, E. J., and Quinn, J. G. (1986). “Treatment of solids and petroleum hydrocarbons in storm runoff with an on-site detention basin.” Bull. Envir. Contamination and Toxicology, 36, 548–555.
7.
Maldonato, T. J., and Uchrin, C. G. (1994). “Petroleum hydrocarbons in detention-basin sediments.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 120(3), 683–690.
8.
Martin, E. H., and Smoot, J. L. (1986). “Constituent-load changes in urban stormwater runoff routed through a detention pond-wetlands system in central Florida.” Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 85-4310, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
9.
McCuen, R. H. (1980). “Water quality trap efficiency of storm water management basins.” Water Resour. Bull., 16(1), 15–21.
10.
Miller, T. L. (1987). “Appraisal of stormwater quality near Salem, Oregon.” Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 87-4064, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver.
11.
Oberts, G. L., and Osgood, R. A. (1991). “Water-quality effectiveness of a detention/wetland treatment system and its effect on an urban lake.” Envir. Mgmt., 15(1), 131–138.
12.
Strecker, E. (1995). “Use of wetlands for stormwater pollution control.” Seminar Publ. Rep. No. EPA/625/R-95/003, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 309–326.
13.
Whipple, W., and Hunter, J. V. (1980). “Detention basin settleability of urban runoff pollution.” Water Resources Research Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, N.J.
14.
Whipple, W., Kropp, R., and Burke, S. (1987). “Implementing dual-purpose stormwater detention programs.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt.; ASCE, 113(6), 779–792.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
History
Published online: Jul 1, 1999
Published in print: Jul 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.