TECHNICAL PAPERS
May 1, 1999

Reaeration Equations Derived from U.S. Geological Survey Database

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 5

Abstract

Accurate estimation of the reaeration-rate coefficient (K2) is extremely important for waste-load allocation. Currently, available K2 estimation equations generally yield poor estimates when applied to stream conditions different from those for which the equations were derived because they were derived from small databases composed of potentially highly inaccurate measurements. A large data set of K2 measurements made with tracer-gas methods was compiled from U.S. Geological Survey studies. This compilation included 493 reaches on 166 streams in 23 states. Careful screening to detect and eliminate erroneous measurements reduced the data set to 371 measurements. These measurements were divided into four subgroups on the basis of flow regime (channel control or pool and riffle) and stream scale (discharge greater than or less than 0.556 m3/s). Multiple linear regression in logarithms was applied to relate K2 to 12 stream hydraulic and water-quality characteristics. The resulting best-estimation equations had the form of semiempirical equations that included the rate of energy dissipation and discharge or depth and width as variables. For equation verification, a data set of K2 measurements made with tracer-gas procedures by other agencies was compiled from the literature. This compilation included 127 reaches on at least 24 streams in at least seven states. The standard error of estimate obtained when applying the developed equations to the U.S. Geological Survey data set ranged from 44 to 61%, whereas the standard error of estimate was 78% when applied to the verification data set.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Bennett, J. P., and Rathbun, R. E. ( 1972). “Reaeration in open channel flow.” U.S. Geological Survey Profl. Paper No. 737, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
2.
Brown, L. C., and Barnwell Jr., T. O. ( 1987). “The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user manual.” Rep. No. EPA/600/3-87/007, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, Ga.
3.
Cleveland, K. D. (1989). “Predicting reaeration rates in Texas streams.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 115(3), 620–632.
4.
Demuynck C., Bauwons, W., De Pauw, N., Dobbelaere, I., and Poelman, E. ( 1997). “Evaluation of pollution reduction scenarios in a river basin: Application of long term water quality simulations.” Water Sci. and Technol., 35(9), 65–75.
5.
Dobbins, W. E. (1965). “Closure to `BOD and oxygen relationships in streams.”' J. Sanit. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 91(5), 49–55.
6.
Flores, H. E. ( 1998). “Equations for estimating the reaeration-rate coefficient in natural streams developed from USGS national data base,” MS thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.
7.
Grant, R. S., and Skavroneck, S. ( 1980). “Comparison of tracer methods and predictive equations for determination of stream-reaeration coefficients on three small streams in Wisconsin.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 80-19, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wis.
8.
Hren, J. ( 1984). “Determination of reaeration coefficients for Ohio streams.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 84-4139, U.S. Geological Survey, Columbus, Ohio.
9.
Kilpatrick, F. A., Rathbun, R. E., Yotsukura, N., Parker, G. W., and DeLong, L. L. ( 1989). “Determination of stream reaeration coefficients by use of tracers.” U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, Book 3, Chapter A18, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Va.
10.
Lau, Y. L. (1972). “Prediction equations for reaeration in open-channel flow.”J. Sanit. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 98(6), 1063–1068.
11.
Melching, C. S. ( 1998). “Accuracy of tracer measurement of gas-desorption rates.” Environmental hydraulics, J. H. W. Lee, A. W. Jayawardema, and Z. Y. Wang, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 481–486.
12.
Melching, C. S., and Yoon, C. G. (1996). “Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic River.”J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt., ASCE, 112(2), 105–113.
13.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. ( 1987). “Passaic River water quality management study.” Rep., New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, N.J.
14.
Parker, G. W., and DeSimone, L. A. ( 1992). “Estimating reaeration coefficients for low-slope streams in Massachusetts and New York.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 91-4188, U.S. Geological Survey, Marlborough, Mass.
15.
Parker, G. W., and Gay, F. B. ( 1987). “A procedure for estimating reaeration coefficients for Massachusetts streams.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 86-4111, U.S. Geological Survey, Boston.
16.
Parkhurst, J. D., and Pomeroy, R. D. (1972). “Oxygen absorption in streams.”J. Sanit. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 98(1), 101–124.
17.
Rathbun, R. E. (1977). “Reaeration coefficients of streams—State-of-the-art.”J. Hydr. Div., ASCE, 103(4), 409–424.
18.
Rathbun, R. E., and Grant, R. S. ( 1978). “Comparison of the radioactive and modified techniques for measurement of stream reaeration coefficients.” U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 78-68, U.S. Geological Survey, Madison, Wis.
19.
Schmidt, A. R., and Stamer, J. K. ( 1987). “Assessment of water quality and factors affecting dissolved oxygen in the Sangamon River, Decatur to Riverton, Illinois, summer 1982.” U.S. Geological Survey Water Resour. Investigations Rep. No. 87-4024, U.S. Geological Survey, Urbana, Ill.
20.
Shindala, A., and Traux, D. D. ( 1980). “Reaeration characteristics of small streams.” Rep. No. MSSU-EIRS-CE-80-6, Mississippi State University, Engineering and Industrial Research Station, Mississippi State, Miss.
21.
Thackston, E. L., and Krenkle, P. A. (1969). “Reaeration prediction in natural streams.”J. Sanit. Engrg. Div., ASCE, 95(1), 65–94.
22.
Tsivoglou, E. C., and Neal, L. A. ( 1976). “Tracer measurement of reaeration. III. Predicting the reaeration capacity of inland streams.” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 48(12), 2669–2689.
23.
Tsivoglou, E. C., Cohen, J. B., Shearer, S. D., and Godsil, P. J. ( 1968). “Tracer measurement of stream reaeration. II. Field studies.” J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 40(2), 285–305.
24.
Tsivoglou, E. C., and Wallace, J. R. ( 1972). “Characterizing stream reaeration capacity.” Rep. No. EPA-R3-72-012, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
25.
Whittemore, R. C. ( 1990). “Development of an expert system for estimating stream reaeration rates.” Air-water mass transfer, S. C. Wilhelms and J. S. Gulliver, eds., ASCE, New York, 378–385.
26.
Wilson, G. T., and Macleod, N. ( 1974). “A critical appraisal of empirical equations and models for the prediction of the coefficient of reaeration of deoxygenated water.” Water Res., 8(6), 341–366.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125Issue 5May 1999
Pages: 407 - 414

History

Received: Oct 15, 1997
Published online: May 1, 1999
Published in print: May 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Member, ASCE,
Student Member, ASCE
Hydr. Engr., Water Resour. Div., U.S. Geological Survey, 221 North Broadway Ave., Urbana, IL 61801.
Student Trainee, Water Resour. Div., U.S. Geological Survey, 221 North Broadway Ave., Urbana, IL.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share