GAC Contactor Design for NOM Removal: Implications of EBCT and Blending
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 2
Abstract
Many drinking water utilities may choose to use granular activated carbon (GAC) to remove disinfection by-product precursors from their water to comply with proposed U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules. Activated carbon usage rates can be minimized by blending effluents from multiple parallel GAC columns. An important issue for the preliminary design of GAC systems is to select the best column size (empty-bed contact time) and number of parallel columns. This study provides an example of the trade-offs between the activated carbon usage rate and frequency of regeneration, for one water source. The variables examined included empty-bed contact time and the number of parallel columns. The following two important trends were observed that apply to all utilities that use GAC: (1) The most dramatic improvement in the activated carbon usage rate from blending effluent occurs when going from one to two parallel columns, whereas the incremental improvement for adding more than two parallel columns decreases rapidly; and (2) a significant disadvantage of utilizing a large number of parallel columns is the need for frequent GAC replacement.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
American Public Health Association (APHA). ( 1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th Ed., APHA, Washington, D.C.
2.
American Water Works Association (AWWA). ( 1990). Water quality and treatment, 4th Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
3.
Arbuckle, W. B. ( 1980). “Premature exhaustion of activated carbon columns.” Activated carbon adsorption of organics from aqueous phase, Vol. 2, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich., 237–252.
4.
Chowdhury, Z. K., Solarik, G., Owen, D. M., Hooper, S. M., and Summers, S. ( 1996). “NOM removal by GAC adsorption: Implication of blending.” Proc., 1996 Annu. Conf. of the Am. Water Works Assoc., American Water Works Association, Denver.
5.
Crittenden, J. C., Berrigan, J. K., Hand, D. W., and Lykins, B. (1987). “Design of rapid fixed-bed adsorption tests for nonconstant diffusivities.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 113(2), 243–259.
6.
Maher, M. K. ( 1996). “GAC contactor design for NOM removal: Implications of EBCT and blending,” MS report, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebr.
7.
Narbaitz, R. M., and Benedek, A. ( 1983). “Least cost process design for granular activated carbon adsorbers.” J. Water Pollution Control Fed., 55(10), 1244–1251.
8.
Owen, D. M., Chowdhury, Z. K., Summers, R. S., Hooper, S. M., and Solarik, G. ( 1996). “Determination of technology and costs for GAC treatment using ICR methodology.” Proc., Workshop on GAC and Membranes: Bench and Pilot-Scale Evaluations, American Water Works Association Research Division and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
9.
Roberts, P. V., and Summers, R. S. ( 1982). “Performance of granular activated carbon for total organic carbon removal.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 74(2), 113–118.
10.
Summers, R. C., Haist, B., Kohler, J., Ritz, J., Zimmer, G., and Sontheimer, H. ( 1989). “Influence of background matter on GAC adsorption.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 81(5), 66–74.
11.
Summers, R. S., Hooper, S. M., Solarik, G., Owen, D. M., and Hong, S. ( 1995). “Bench-scale evaluation of GAC for NOM control.” J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 87(8), 69–80.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 2 • February 1999
Pages: 161 - 165
History
Received: May 7, 1998
Published online: Feb 1, 1999
Published in print: Feb 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.