TECHNICAL PAPERS
Dec 1, 1999

Competitive Substrate Biodegradation during Surfactant-Enhanced Remediation

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 12

Abstract

The impact of synthetic surfactants on the aqueous phase biodegradation of benzene, toluene, and p-xylene (BTpX) was studied using two anionic surfactants, sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), and two nonionic surfactants, POE(20) sorbitan monooleate (T-maz-80) and octylphenolpoly(ethyleneoxy) ethanol (CA-620). Batch biodegradation experiments were performed to evaluate surfactant biodegradability using two different microbial cultures. Of the four surfactants used in this study, SDS and T-maz-80 were readily degraded by a microbial consortium obtained from an activated sludge treatment system, whereas only SDS was degraded by a microbial culture that was acclimated to BTpX. Biodegradation kinetic parameters associated with SDS and T-maz-80 degradation by the activated sludge consortium were estimated using respirometric data in conjunction with a nonlinear parameter estimation technique as μmax = 0.93 h1, Ks = 96.18 mg/L and μmax = 0.41 h1, Ks = 31.92 mg/L, respectively. When both BTpX and surfactant were present in the reactor along with BTpX-acclimated microorganisms, two distinct biodegradation patterns were seen. SDS was preferentially utilized inhibiting hydrocarbon biodegradation, whereas the other three surfactants had no impact on BTpX biodegradation. None of the four surfactants were toxic to the microbial cultures used in this study. Readily biodegradable surfactants are not very effective for subsurface remediation applications as they are rapidly consumed, and also because of their potential inhibitory effects on intrinsic hydrocarbon biodegradation. This greatly increases treatment costs as surfactant recovery and reuse are adversely affected.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Aronstein, B. N., and Alexander, M. (1992). “Surfactants at low concentrations simulate biodegradation of sorbed hydrocarbons in samples of aquifer sands and soil slurries.” Envir. Toxicol. Chem., 11, 1227–1233.
2.
Aronstein, B. N., and Alexander, M. (1993). “Effect of a non-ionic surfactant added to the soil surface on the biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons within the soil.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 39, 386–390.
3.
Aronstein, B. N., Calvillo, Y. M., and Alexander, M. (1991). “Effect of surfactants at low concentrations on the desorption and biodegradation of sorbed compounds in soil.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 25, 1728–1731.
4.
Deschenes, L., Lafrance, P., Villeneuve, J.-P., and Samson, R. (1996). “Adding sodium dodecyl sulfate and Pseudomonas aeruginosa UG2 biosurfactants inhibits polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in a weathered creosote-contaminated soil.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 46, 638–646.
5.
Doong, R., Lei, W., Chen, T., Lee, C., Chen, J., and Chang, W. (1996). “Effect of nonionic surfactants on sorption and micellar solubilization of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.” Water Sci. and Technol., 34, 327–334.
6.
Fu, M. H., and Alexander, M. (1995). “Use of surfactants and slurrying to enhance the biodegradation of soil components initially dissolved in nonaqueous-phase liquids.” Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 43, 551–558.
7.
Gaudy, A. F., Jr. and Gaudy, E. T. (1988). Elements of bioenvironmental engineering. Engineering Press, San Jose.
8.
Grady, C. P. L., Jr. Daigger, G. T., and Lim, H. C. (1998). Biological waste treatment, 2nd Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York.
9.
Grady, C. P. L., Jr. Dang, J. S., Harvey, D. M., Jobbagy, A., and Wang, X. L. (1989). “Determination of biodegradation kinetics through use of electrolytic respirometry.” Water Sci. and Technol., 21, 957–968.
10.
Guerin, W. F., and Jones, G. E. (1988). “Mineralization of phenanthrene by a Mycobacterium sp.” Appl. Envir. Microbiol., 54, 937–944.
11.
Laha, S., and Luthy, R. G. (1991). “Inhibition of phenanthrene mineralization by nonionic surfactants in soil-water systems.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 25, 1920–1929.
12.
Laha, S., and Luthy, R. G. (1992). “Effects of nonionic surfactants on the solubilization and mineralization of phenanthrene in soil-water systems.” Biotechnol. Bioeng., 40, 1367–1380.
13.
Madsen, T., and Kristensen, P. (1997). “Effects of bacterial inoculation and nonionic surfactants on degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil.” Envir. Toxicol. Chem., 16, 631–637.
14.
Marchesi, J. R., Russell, N. R., White, G. F., and House, W. A. (1991). “Effects of surfactant adsorption and biodegradability on the distribution of bacteria between sediments and water in a fresh water microcosm.” Appl. and Envir. Microbiol., 57(9), 2507–2513.
15.
McCarty, P. L. (1975). “Stoichiometry of biological reactions.” Prog. Water Technol., 7, 157–172.
16.
Rouse, J. D., Sabatini, D. A., Brown, R. E., and Harwell, J. H. (1996). “Evaluation of ethoxylated alkylsulfate surfactants for use in subsurface remediation.” Water Envir. Res., 68, 162–168.
17.
Rouse, J. D., Sabatini, D. A., and Harwell, J. H. (1993). “Minimizing surfactant losses using twin-head anionic surfactants in subsurface remediation.” Envir. Sci. Technol., 27, 2072–2078.
18.
Sabatini, D. A., Knox, R. C., and Harwell, J. H. ( 1996). “Surfactant-enhanced DNAPL remediation: Surfactant selection, hydraulic efficiency, and economic factors.” United States Environmental Protection Agency: Environmental Research Brief, Report Number EPA/600/S96/002, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Ada, Okla., 1–15.
19.
Shiau, B., Sabatini, D. A., and Harwell, J. H. (1995). “Properties of food grade (edible) surfactants affecting subsurface remediation of chlorinated solvents.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 29, 2929–2935.
20.
Swisher, R. D. (1987). Surfactant biodegradation. 2nd Ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.
21.
Thibault, S. L., Anderson, M., and Frankenberger, W. T., Jr. (1996). “Influence of surfactants on pyrene desorption and degradation in soils.” Appl. Envir. Microbiol., 62, 283–287.
22.
Tiehm, A. (1994). “Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of synthetic surfactants.” Appl. Envir. Microbiol., 60, 258–263.
23.
Tiehm, A., Stieber, M., Werner, P., and Frimmel, F. H. (1997). “Surfactant-enhanced mobilization and biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in manufactured gas plant soil.” Envir. Sci. and Technol., 31, 2570–2576.
24.
Tsomides, H. J., Hughes, J. B., Thomas, J. M., and Ward, C. H. (1995). “Effect of surfactant addition on phenanthrene biodegradation in sediments.” Envir. Toxicol. Chem., 14, 953–959.
25.
van Ginkel, C. G. (1996). “Complete degradation of xenobiotic surfactants by consortia of aerobic microorganisms.” Biodegradation, 7, 151–164.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125Issue 12December 1999
Pages: 1142 - 1148

History

Received: Nov 25, 1998
Published online: Dec 1, 1999
Published in print: Dec 1999

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Student Member, ASCE
Res. Asst., Cell Culture and Biopress Engrg., Bayer Corp., Biotechnology Div., 800 Dwight Way, Berkeley, CA 94701-1986; formerly, Bioenvironmental Engrg. and Sci. Lab., School of Civ. Engrg. and Envir. Sci., 202 West Boyd, Room 334, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
Asst. Prof., Bioenvironmental Engrg. and Sci. Lab., School of Civ. Engrg. and Envir. Sci., 202 West Boyd, Room 334, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK; corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Res. Assoc., Environmental Engrg. Lab., School of Civ. Engrg. and Envir. Sci., 202 West Boyd, Room 334, Univ. of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share