Rheology as Tool for Polymer Dose Assessment and Control
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125, Issue 12
Abstract
Rheological characteristics of sludge represent one of the few examples of fundamentally derivable properties that have also been successfully used for the improvement of actual sludge treatment processes. Previous research has suggested the use of certain sludge rheological parameters for polymer dose optimization and floc characterization. This research evaluated the use of rheological properties for characterization and control of sludge conditioning with polyelectrolytes. Rheological characteristics were compared with dewaterability in laboratory evaluations, utilizing both synthetic cellulose suspension and actual sludge. These experiments were designed to identify fundamental rheological parameters that may have the potential to be used for assessment and control of conditioning and dewatering processes. This paper reports and analyzes results from controlled laboratory experiments; evaluations of on-line rheology measurements for process control in a nearby sludge handing facility have been presented elsewhere. Laboratory conditioning indicators were capillary suction time, liquid stream (centrate) streaming current and viscosity, and solids measurements. Full-scale dewatering indicators were capillary suction time, liquid stream (filtrate) streaming current, and percent solids recovery. Results indicated lack of correlation between the proposed conditioned sludge rheology-control parameters and conditioning indices over a wide range of mixing conditions. Mixing parameters have a substantial effect on the rheological characteristics of the concentrated suspensions and shed some light upon floc strength as related to dewaterability.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Abu-Orf, M. M., and Dentel, S. K. (1998). “Automated control of polymer dose using the streaming current detector.” Water Envir. Res., 70(5), 1005–1018.
2.
Abu-Orf, M. M., and Dentel, S. K. (1997). “Polymer dose assessment using the streaming current detector.” Water Envir. Res., 69(6), 1075–1085.
3.
APHA-AWWA-WEF. (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed., A. D. Eaton, L. S. Clesceri, and A. E. Greenberg, eds.
4.
Bastian, R. K. (1997). “Biosolids management in the United States.” Water Envir. Technol., 9(5), 45–50.
5.
Campbell, H. W., Rush, R. J., and Tew, R. (1978). “Sludge dewatering design manual.” Canada-Ontario Agreement Res. Rep. No. 72, Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, Ont.
6.
Campbell, H. W., and Crescuolo, P. J. (1982). “The use of rheology for sludge characterization.” Water Sci. Technol., 14, 475–489.
7.
Campbell, H. W., and Crescuolo, P. J. (1989). “Control of polymer addition for sludge conditioning: A demonstration study.” Water Sci. Technol., 21, 1309–1317.
8.
Christensen, J. R., Sorensen, P. B., Christensen, G. L., and Hansen, J. A. (1993). “Mechanisms for overdosing in sludge conditioning.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 119(1), 159–171.
9.
Dentel, S. K. (1997). “Evaluation and role of rheological properties in sludge management.” Water Sci. Technol., 36(11), 1–8.
10.
Dentel, S. K. ( 1984). “Coagulation of organic suspensions with aluminum salts,” PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
11.
Dentel, S. K., and Abu-Orf, M. M. (1995). “Laboratory and full-scale studies of liquid stream viscosity and streaming current for characterization and monitoring of dewaterability.” Water Res., 29, 2663–2672.
12.
Dentel, S. K., Abu-Orf, M. M., and Griskowitz, N. J. ( 1995). “Polymer characterization and control in biosolids management.” Publ. D43007, Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, Va.
13.
Dentel, S. K., Abu-Orf, M. M., and Griskowitz, N. J. ( 1993). “Guidance manual for polymer selection in wastewater treatment plants.” Publ. D0013, Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, Va.
14.
Dick, R. I. (1970). “Role of activated sludge final settling tanks.”J. Sanitary Engrg. Div.., ASCE, 96(2), 423–436.
15.
Dick, R. I. (1979). “Physical properties of activated sludge.” Proc., NATO Adv. Study Inst. on Sludge Characterization and Behavior, University of Delaware, Del.
16.
Dick, R. I., and Ewing, B. B. (1967). “The rheology of activated sludge.” J. WPCF, 39, 543–560.
17.
Dick, R. I., and M. and Buck, J. H. (1985). “Measurement of activated sludge rheology.” Proc., Envir. Engrg., ASCE, New York, 539–545.
18.
Forester, C. F. (1981). “Preliminary studies on the relationship between sewage sludge viscosities and the nature of the surfaces of the component particles.” Biotechnol. Letters, 3(12), 707–712.
19.
Griskowitz, N. J. ( 1994). “Cationic polyelectrolyte fate and effect in dewatering of cellulose sludge,” Master's thesis, University of Delaware, Del.
20.
Hiemenz, P. C., and Rajagopalan, R. (1997). Principles of colloid and surface chemistry, 3rd ed., New York, Marcel Dekker, Inc.
21.
Hunter, J. V., and Heukelekian, H. (1965). “The composition of domestic sewage fraction.” J. WPCF, 37, 1142.
22.
Keenan, H. H., Papavasilopoulos, E. N., and Bache, D. H. (1998). “Measurement of polymer residuals in alum sludge.” Wat. Res., 32(10), 3173.
23.
Langer, S. J., Klute, R., and Hahn, H. H. (1994). “Mechanisms of floc formation in sludge conditioning with polymers.” Water Sci. Technol., 30(8), 129.
24.
Novak, J. T., Prendevill, J. F., and Sherrard, J. H. (1988). “Mixing intensity and polymer performance in sludge dewatering.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 114(1), 190–198.
25.
Otsubo, Y. ( 1990). “Elastic percolation in suspensions flocculated by polymer bridging.” Langmuir Photoelectrochemical and Electrochemical Surface Science: Microstructural Probes of Electrode Processes, 6, 114–118.
26.
Otsubo, Y., and Umeya, K. (1984). “Rheological properties of silica suspensions in polyacrylamide solutions.” J. of Rheology, 28(2), 95–104.
27.
Sanin, F. D., and Vesilind, P. A. (1996). “Synthetic sludge: A physical/chemical model in understanding bioflocculation.” Water Envir. Res., 68, 927–933.
28.
Schramm, G. (1994). A practical approach to rheology and rheometry. Gebrueder Haake GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany.
29.
Schurz, J. (1991). “Rheology of polymer suspensions of the network type.” Prog. Polm. Sci., 16, 1–53.
30.
Spinosa, L., Santori, M., and Lotito, V. (1989). “Rheological characterization of sewage sludges.” Recycling von klarschlamm, 2, U. Loll, ed., EF-Verlag, Berlin.
31.
Tiller, F. M., Shen, Y. L., and Adin, A. (1991). “Capillary suction theory for rectangular cells.” J. WPCF, 62(2), 130–136.
32.
US EPA. (1987). “Design manual: Dewatering municipal wastewater sludges.” U.S. EPA CERI/ORD, EPA 652/1-87-014, Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio.
33.
Vesilind, P. A. (1988). “Capillary suction time as a fundamental measure of sludge dewaterability.” J. WPCF, 60(2), 215–220.
34.
Walker, C. A., Kirby, J. T., and Dentel, S. K. (1996). “The streaming current detector: A quantitative model.” J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 182, 71–81.
35.
Wood, R. F., and Dick, R. I. (1975). “Some effect of sludge characteristics on dissolved air flotation.” Prog. Water. Techn., 7, 173–182.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 125 • Issue 12 • December 1999
Pages: 1133 - 1141
History
Received: May 21, 1999
Published online: Dec 1, 1999
Published in print: Dec 1999
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.