TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 1997

Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Anaerobic Propionate Systems

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 7

Abstract

The design of anaerobic treatment systems for sulfate containing high-strength wastewater requires the understanding of interactions between sulfate reducers and other anaerobes. The objectives of this research were to study the effects of the feed propionate:sulfate ratio on the interactions among the sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB), acetogens, and methanogens, and to determine the kinetics of anaerobic biological reactions for propionate degradation under sulfate-limited and sulfate-rich conditions. Both continuous and batch experiments were conducted to meet these objectives. In sulfate-limited chemostats with propionate as the sole carbon source, the effluent sulfate concentration was governed by the propionate utilizing SRB and was below 10 mg/L. In sulfate-rich systems the effluent sulfate concentration was governed by acetate utilizing SRB and could not be maintained below 400 mg/L without controlling the sulfide concentration. Under these sulfate-rich conditions, a decrease in SRT from 30 to 13 d decreased the extent of acetate utilization by SRB. The propionate utilizing SRB outcompeted the propionate utilizing acetogens in the chemostats. This was attributed to lower Monod-half velocity coefficient, Ks, for propionate utilization by SRB (4.5 mg-Pr/L), than the Ks for propionate utilization by acetogens (20.4 mg-Pr/L). The rate constants (k) for SRB and acetogens in terms of mg of propionate/mg of volatile suspended solids (VSS) per day were approximately 5.2 and 3.1 mg-Pr/mg-VSS-d, respectively. In sulfate-rich conditions, propionate was utilized by SRB, and the intermediate acetate was utilized by both SRB and methanogens.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
APHA, AWWA, WEF. (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed., APHA, Washington, D.C.
2.
Beller, H. R., Grbic-Galic, D., and Reinhard, M.(1992). “Microbial degradation of toluene under sulfate-reducing conditions and the influence of iron on the process.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 58, 786.
3.
Conrad, R., Lupton, F. S., and Zeikus, J. G.(1987). “Hydrogen metabolism and sulfate-dependent inhibition of methanogenesis in eutrophic lake sediment (Lake Mendota).”FEMS Microbiol. and Ecology, 45, 107.
4.
Devereux, R., Delany, M., Widdel, F., and Stahl, D. A.(1989). “Natural relationships among sulfate reducing eubacteria.”J. Bacteriology, 171, 6689.
5.
Dohanyos, M., Zabranska, J., and Grau, P. (1988). “Anaerobic breakdown of acrylic acid.”Anaerobic Digestion 1988: Proc., 5th Int. Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion, Bologna, Italy, 287–294.
6.
Dong, H., Plugge, C. M., and Stams, A. J. M.(1994). “Anaerobic degradation of propionate by a mesophilic acetogenic bacterium in coculture and triculture with different methanogens.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 60, 234.
7.
Edwards, E. A., Wills, L. E., Reinhard, M., and Grbic-Galic, D.(1992). “Anaerobic degradation of toluene and xylene by aquifer microorganisms under sulfate reducing conditions.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 58, 794.
8.
Gorontzy, T., Kuver, J., and Botevogel, K. H.(1993). “Microbial transformations of nitroaromatic compounds under anaerobic conditions.”J. General Microbiol., 139, 131.
9.
Ingvorsen, K., Zehnder, A. J. B., and Jorgensen, B. B.(1984). “Kinetics of sulfate and acetate uptake by Desulfobacter postgatei.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 47, 403.
10.
Isa, Z., Grusenmeyer, S., and Verstraete, W.(1986). “Sulfate reduction relative to methane production in high-rate anaerobic digestion: technical aspects.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 51, 572.
11.
Kim, L. S., Young, J. C., and Tabak, H. H.(1994). “Kinetics of acetogenesis and methanogenesis in anaerobic reactions under toxic conditions.”Water Envir. Res., 66, 119.
12.
Kristjansson, J. K., Schoneit, P., and Thauer, R. K.(1982). “Different Ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate.”Archives of Microbiology, 131, 278.
13.
Kuijk, B. L. M. V., and Stams, A. J. M.(1995). “Sulfate reduction by a syntrophic propionate-oxidizing bacterium.”Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 68, 293.
14.
Laanbroek, J. H., and Pfennig, N.(1981). “Oxidation of short chain fatty acids by sulfate reducing bacteria in fresh water and marine sediments.”Archives of Microbiology, 128, 330.
15.
Laanbroek, J. H., Geerligs, H. J., Sijtsma, L., and Veldkamp, H.(1984). “Competition for sulfate and ethanol among Desulfobacter, Desulfobulbus, and Desulfovibrio species isolated from intertidal sediments.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 47, 329.
16.
Lovley, D. R., Dwyer, D. F., and Klug, M. J.(1982). “Kinetic analysis of competition between sulfate reducers and methanogens for hydrogen in sediments.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 43, 1373.
17.
McCartney, D. M., and Oleszkiewicz, J. A.(1991). “Sulfide inhibition of anaerobic degradation of lactate and acetate.”Water Res., 25, 203.
18.
McCarty, P. L.(1964). “Anaerobic waste treatment fundamentals: I. chemistry and microbiology.”Public Works, 95(9), 107.
19.
McCarty, P. L. (1972). “Stoichiometry of biological reactions.”Rep. Prepared for the International Conference, Toward a Unified Concept of Biological Waste Treatment Design, Atlanta, Ga.
20.
Middleton, C. A., and Lawrence, A. W.(1977). “Kinetics of microbial sulfate reduction.”J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 49, 1659.
21.
Newbigging, M., Watt, M., Sinnige, L., and Bevan, B. (1993). Treatment alternatives for sulfate removal from a landfill leachate.”Proc., Water Envir. Fedn., 66th Annu. Conf., Anaheim, Calif.
22.
Oleszkiewicz, J. A., and Hilton, B. L.(1986). “Anaerobic treatment of high sulfate wastes.”Can. J. Civ. Engrg, Ottawa, Canada, 13, 423.
23.
Parkes, R. J., Gibson, G. R., Harvey, I. M., Buckingham, W. J., and Herbert, R. A.(1989). “Determination of the substrates for sulfate reducing bacteria within marine and estuarine sediments with different rates of sulfate reduction.”J. General Microbiology, 135, 175.
24.
Parkin, G. F., Lynch, N. A., Kuo, W. C., Edward, L. V. K., and Bhattacharya, S. K.(1990). “Interaction between sulfate reducers and methane producers fed acetate and propionate.”J. Water Pollution Control Fedn., 62, 780.
25.
Puhakka, J. A., Salonen, S. M., Ferguson, J. F., and Benjamin, M. M.(1990). “Carbon flow in acetotrophic enrichment cultures from pulp mill effluent treatment.”Water Res., 24, 515.
26.
Robinson, J. A., and Tiedje, J. M.(1984). “Competition between sulfate reduction and methanogenic bacteria for H2 under growing and resting conditions.”Archives of Microbiology, 137, 26.
27.
Schoneit, P., Kristjansson, J. K., and Thauer, R. K.(1982). “Kinetic mechanism for the ability of sulfate reducers to outcompete methanogens for acetate.”Archives of Microbiology, 132, 285.
28.
Smith, M. R., and Mah, R. A.(1978). “Growth and methanogenesis by Methanosarcina strain 227 on acetate and methanol.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 36, 870.
29.
Smith, R. L., and Klug, M. J.(1981). “Electron donors utilized by sulfate reducing bacteria in eutrophic lake sediments.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 42, 116.
30.
Tchobanoglous, G., and Burton, F. L. (1991). Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.
31.
Thauer, R. K., Jungermann, K., and Decker, K.(1997). “Energy conservation in chemotrophic anaerobic bacteria.”Bacteriology Rev., 41, 100.
32.
Tholozan, J. L., Samain, E., Grivet, J. P., Moletta, R., Dubourguier, H. C., and Albagnac, G.(1988). “Reductive carboxylation of propionate to butyrate in methanogenic ecosystems.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 54, 441.
33.
Uberoi, V. (1996). “Interactions among sulfate reducers, acetogens and methanogens in the presence and absence of organic toxicants in anaerobic propionate systems,” PhD thesis, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, La.
34.
Uberoi, V., and Bhattacharya, S. K.(1995). “Interactions among sulfate reducers, acetogens and methanogens in anaerobic propionate systems.”Water Envir. Res., 67, 330.
35.
Visser, A., Gao, Y., and Lettinga, G.(1993). “Effects of short-term temperature increases on the mesophilic anaerobic breakdown of sulfate containing synthetic wastewater.”Water Res., 27, 541.
36.
Wagner, S., and Schink, B.(1988). “Fermentative degradation of nonionic surfactants and polyethylene glycol by enrichment cultures and pure cultures of homoacetogenic and propionate-forming bacteria.”Appl. Envir. Microbiology, 54, 561.
37.
Widdel, F., and Pfennig, N.(1982). “Studies on the dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids. II. Incomplete oxidation of propionate by Desulfobulbus propionicus gen. nov., sp.”Archives of Microbiology, 131, 360.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123Issue 7July 1997
Pages: 675 - 682

History

Published online: Jul 1, 1997
Published in print: Jul 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Vikas Uberoi
Res. Assoc., Dept. of Envir. Sci., Rutgers-The State Univ., New Brunswick, NJ 08903; formerly, PhD Candidate, Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA 70118.
Sanjoy K. Bhattacharya
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share