TECHNICAL PAPERS
Jul 1, 1997

Nanofiltration of Natural Organic Matter: pH and Ionic Strength Effects

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 7

Abstract

Studies were conducted to examine the effect of solution chemistry, defined here as pH and ionic strength, on the permeability of negatively charged polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Water permeation through the membrane was demonstrated to decrease at conditions of low pH and high ionic strength in the absence of organic macromolecules. The reduction in membrane permeability was attributed to a compaction of the membrane matrix resulting from charge neutralization at the membrane surface and electric double layer compression. An uncharged model organic macromolecule (polyethylene glycol) was used to quantify the effects of solution chemistry on membrane compaction and solute rejection capabilities of the charged membrane. Studies of membrane permeability and rejection were then repeated with solutions containing natural organic matter (NOM), enabling concurrent evaluation of the effects of electric double layer compression as well as changes in both membrane structure and the apparent macromolecular size of charged NOM macromolecules.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Aimar, P., Baklouti, S., and Sanchez, V.(1991). “Concentration polarization build-up in hollow fibers: a method of measurement and its modeling in ultrafiltration.”J. Membrane Sci., 59, 81–99.
2.
Akred, A. R., Fane, A. G., and Friend, J. P. (1980). “Negative rejection of proteins by charged ultrafiltration membranes.”Ultrafiltration membranes and applications, A. R. Cooper, ed., Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y., 353–372.
3.
Belfort, G.(1989). “Fluid mechanics in membrane filtration: recent developments.”J. Membrane Sci., 40, 123–147.
4.
Braghetta, A. (1995). “The influence of solution chemistry and operating conditions on nanofiltration of charged and uncharged organic macromolecules,” PhD thesis, Univ. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N.C.
5.
Braghetta, A., and DiGiano, F. A. (1994). “Organic solute association with nanofiltration membrane surface: Influence of pH and ionic strength on membrane performance.”Proc., Annu. AWWA Cont., Sm. Water Works Assn., New York, N.Y.
6.
Clark, M. M., and Jucker, C. (1993). “Interactions between hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes and humic substances.”Proc., Membrane Technol. Conf., Am. Water Works Assn., Baltimore, Md., 259–272.
7.
Cornel, P. K., Summers, R. S., and Roberts, P. V.(1986). “Diffusion of humic acid in dilute aqueous solution.”J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 110(1), 149–164.
8.
Cwirko, E. H., and Carbonell, R. G.(1989). “Transport of electrolytes in charged pores: analysis using the method of spatial averaging.”J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 129(2), 513–531.
9.
Davidson, M. G., and Deen, W. M.(1988). “Hydrodynamic theory for the hindered transport of flexible macromolecules in porous membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 35, 167–172.
10.
Edzwald, J. K., Becker, W. C., and Wattier, K. L.(1985). “Surrogate parameters for monitoring organic matter and THM precursors.”J. Am. Water Works Assn., 77(4), 122–131.
11.
Fane, A. G., Fell, C. J. D., and Suki, A.(1983). “The effect of pH and ionic environment on the ultrafiltration of protein solutions with retentive membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 16, 195–210.
12.
Fu, P., Ruiz, H., Thompson, K., and Spangenberg, C.(1994). “Selecting membranes for removing NOM and DBP precursors.”J. Am. Water Works Assn., 86(12), 55–72.
13.
Ghosh, K., and Schnitzer, M.(1980). “Macromolecular structures of humic substances.”Soil Sci., 129(5), 266–276.
14.
Green, S., Morel, F. M., and Blough, N. V.(1992). “Investigation of the electrostatic properties of humic substances by fluorescence quenching.”Envir. Sci. and Technol., 26(2), 294–301.
15.
Gregor, H. P. (1976). “Fixed-charge ultrafiltration membranes.”Charged gels and membranes, part I, E. Selegny, ed., Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 57–69.
16.
Ingham, K. C., Busby, T. F., Sahlestrom, Y., and Castino, F. (1979). “Separation of macromolecules by ultrafiltration: influence of protein adsorption, protein-protein interactions, and concentration polarization.”Ultrafiltration membranes and applications, A. R. Cooper, ed., Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, N.Y., 141–158.
17.
Jucker, C. (1993). “Interactions between aquatic humic substances and ultrafiltration membranes,” MS thesis, Univ. of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Ill.
18.
Kilduff, J., and Weber, W. J. Jr.(1992). “Transport and separation of organic macromolecules in ultrafiltration processes.”Envir. Sci. and Technol., 26(3), 569–577.
19.
Krasner, S. W., Westrick, J. J., and Regli, S.(1995). “Bench and pilot testing under the ICR.”J. Am. Water Works Assn., 87(8), 60–68.
20.
Lee, C. K., and Hong, J.(1988). “Characterization of electric charges in microporous membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 39, 79–88.
21.
Lentsch, S., Aimar, P., and Orozco, J. L.(1993). “Separation albumin-PEG: transmission of PEG through ultrafiltration membranes.”Biotechnol. and Bioengrg., 41, 1039–1047.
22.
Logan, B. E., and Jiang, Q.(1990). “Molecular size distributions of dissolved organic matter.”J. Envir. Engrg., 116(6), 1046–1062.
23.
Marinas, B., and Selleck, R. E.(1992). “Reverse osmosis treatment of multicomponent electrolyte solutions.”J. Membrane Sci., 72, 211–229.
24.
Matsuura, T. (1994). Synthetic membranes and membrane separation. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, Fla., 467.
25.
Matthiasson, E.(1983). “The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 16, 23–36.
26.
Nilson, J., and DiGiano, F. A.(1996). “Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration.”J. Am. Water Works Assn., 88(5), 53–66.
27.
Nystrom, M., Lindstrom, M., and Matthiasson, E.(1989). “Streaming potential as a tool in the characterization of ultrafiltration membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 36, 297–312.
28.
Reinhard, M.(1984). “Molecular weight distribution of dissolved organic carbon and dissolved organic halogen in advanced treated wastewaters.”Envir. Sci. and Technol., 18, 410–415.
29.
Saskena, S., and Zydney, A. L.(1994). “Effect of solution pH and ionic strength on the separation of albumin from immunoglobulins (IgG) by selective filtration.”Biotechnol. and Bioengrg., 43, 960–968.
30.
Serkiz, S. M., and Perdue, E. M.(1990). “Isolation of dissolved organic matter from Suwannee river using reverse osmosis.”Water Res., 24(7), 911–916.
31.
Summers, R. S. (1986). “Activated carbon adsorption of humics: effect of molecular size and heterodispersity,” PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.
32.
Summers, R. S., and Roberts, P. V.(1988a). “Activated carbon adsorption of humic substances: I heterodisperse mixtures and desorption.”J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 112(2), 367–381.
33.
Summers, R. S., and Roberts, P. V.(1988b). “Activated carbon adsorption of humic substances: II size exclusion and electrostatic interactions.”J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 112(2), 382–397.
34.
Tam, C. M., and Tremblay, M.(1991). “Membrane pore characterization—comparison between single and multicomponent solute probe techniques.”J. Membrane Sci., 57, 271–287.
35.
Tasaka, M., Tamura, S., and Takemura, N.(1982). “Concentration dependence of electroosmosis and streaming potential across charged membranes.”J. Membrane Sci., 12, 169–182.
36.
Tsuru, T., Urair, M., Nakao, S. I., and Kimura, S. (1991). “Negative rejection of anions in the loose reverse osmosis separation of monoand divalent ion mixtures.”Desalination and water reuse, Vol. 1, Inst. Chem. Engrg. Symp. Series #125.
37.
Turker, M., and Hubble, J.(1987). “Membrane fouling in a constant—flux ultrafiltration cell.”J. Membrane Sci., 34, 267–281.
38.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).(1994). “Proposed rules for public drinking water supplies: monitoring and other information requirements.”Federal Register, 59(28), 6332.
39.
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). (1989). “Humic substances in the Suwannee River, Georgia: interactions, properties, and proposed structures.”Open File Rep. 87-557, Denver, Colo.
40.
van den Berg, G. B., and Smolders, C. A.(1989). “Concentration polarization phenomena during dead-end ultrafiltration of protein mixtures: the influence of solute-solute interactions.”J. Membrane Sci., 47, 1–24.
41.
Verbrugge, M. W., and Hill, R. F.(1988). “Experimental and theoretical investigation of perfluorosulfonic acid membranes equilibrated with aqueous sulfuric acid solutions.”J. Phys. Chem., 92, 6778–6783.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123Issue 7July 1997
Pages: 628 - 641

History

Published online: Jul 1, 1997
Published in print: Jul 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anne Braghetta
Sr. Engineer, Montgomery Watson, 560 Herndon Parkway, Ste. 300, Herndon, VA 20170.
Francis A. DiGiano, Member, ASCE,
Prof., Dept. of Envir. Sci. and Engrg., Univ. of North Carolina, CB#7400, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7400.
William P. Ball, Member, ASCE
Asst. Prof., Dept. of Geography and Envir. Engrg., Johns Hopkins Univ., 313 Ames Hall, Baltimore, MD 21218-2686.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share