TECHNICAL PAPERS
Mar 1, 1997

Evaluation of Uncertainty in a Site-Specific Risk Assessment

Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 3

Abstract

An evaluation was performed of the uncertainty in predicted carcinogenic risk resulting from uncertainty in site properties and fate and transport predictions for a simple contaminated soil site. SoilRisk, a risk model for organic contaminants in soil, was applied to a case-study site consisting of sandy soil and a thin, near surface, unconfined aquifer. The site-related parameters found to affect predicted risk most significantly were the soil-water volumetric flux rate (Jw) in the unsaturated zone, the longitudinal dispersivity (αL) and the Darcy velocity (Vd) in the saturated zone, and the soil organic carbon fraction in both zones (foc, focsat). Model runs using probability distribution functions (PDFs) for these input parameters yielded cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) for the total risk estimates, the shape and location of which depended on the chemical and exposure scenario. In general, uncertainty in risk at the case-study site was found to be greater for the more mobile and less degradable of the chemicals studied [trichloroethylene (TCE) and chlordane] than for benzene, which is highly degradable, and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), which is very immobile in the subsurface.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

References

1.
Baes, C. F. III, and Sharp, R. D.(1983). “A proposal for estimation of soil leaching and leaching constants for use in assessment models.”J. Envir. Quality, 12(1), 17–28.
2.
Dagan, G. (1986). “Statistical theory of groundwater flow and transport: pore to laboratory, laboratory to formation, formation to regional scale.”Water Resour. Res., 22(9), 120S–134S.
3.
Donigian, A. S., Yo, T. Y., and Shanahan, E. W. (1983). “Rapid assessment of potential groundwater contamination under emergency response conditions.”Rep. EPA-600/8-83-030, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
4.
Ebasco Services Inc. (1989). “Final remedial investigation/feasibility study, Byron Barrel and Drum Site, Byron, NY.”Rep. EPA Contract No. 68-01-7250, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
5.
Freeze, R. A.(1975). “A stochastic conceptual analysis of one dimensional groundwater flow in a non-uniform homogeneous media.”Water Resour. Res., 11(5), 725–741.
6.
Freeze, R., and Cherry, J. A. (1979). Groundwater. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
7.
Gelhar, L. W., Mantoglou, A., Welty, C., and Rehfeldt, K. R. (1985). “A review of field-scale solute transport processes in saturated and unsaturated porous media.' Rep. EA-4190 RP-2485-05, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.
8.
Grisham, J. W. (1986). Health aspects of the disposal of waste chemicals. Pergamon Press, New York, N.Y.
9.
Jury, W. A. (1985). “Spatial variability of soil physical parameters in solute migration: a critical literature review.”Rep. EPRI EA-4228, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, Calif.
10.
Jury, W. A., Russo, D., Streile, G., and Hesham, E. A.(1990). “Evaluation of volatilization by organic chemicals residing below the soil surface.”Water Resour. Res., 26(1), 13–20.
11.
Labieniec, P. A. (1994). “The risk implications of approaches for setting soil remediation goals at hazardous waste contaminated sites,”PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa.
12.
Labieniec, P. A., Dzombak, D. A., and Siegrist, R. L.(1996a). “SoilRisk: a risk assessment model for organic contaminants in soil.”J. Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 122(5), 388–398.
13.
Labieniec, P. A., Dzombak, D. A., and Siegrist, R. L.(1996b). “Risk variability due to uniform soil remediation goals.”Envir. Engrg., ASCE, 122(7), 612–621.
14.
Loague, K.(1991). “The impact of land use on estimates of pesticide leaching potential: assessments and uncertainties.”J. Contaminated Hydro., 8, 157–175.
15.
Mason, B. J. (1983). “Preparation of soil sampling protocol: techniques and strategies.”Rep. EPA/600/4-83/020, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
16.
Mason, B. J. (1992). “Preparation of soil sampling protocols: sampling techniques and strategies.”Rep. EPA/600/R-92/128, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
17.
Morgan, M. G., and Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, England.
18.
Seinfeld, J. H. (1986). Atmospheric chemistry and physics of air pollution. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y.
19.
Spiegel, M. R. (1961). Schaum's outline series: theory and problems of statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
20.
Thompson, K. M., Burmaster, D. E., and Crouch, E. A. C.(1992). “Monte Carlo techniques for quantitative uncertainty analysis in public health risk assessments.”Risk Anal., 12(1), 53–63.
21.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1968). Climatic atlas of the United States. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
22.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1987). “Data quality objectives for remedial response activities: example scenario: RI/FS activities at a site with contaminated soils and groundwater.”Rep. PB90-272634, Washington, D.C.
23.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1989). “Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I human health evaluation manual (part A).”Rep. EPA/540/1-89/002, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
24.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1991). “Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I: human health evaluation manual supplemental guidance `standard default exposure factors' interim final.”Rep. OSWER Directive: 9285.6-03 (or PB91-921314), Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C.
25.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1994). “Soil screening level guidance draft.”Rep. PB95-963529, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Go to Journal of Environmental Engineering
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123Issue 3March 1997
Pages: 234 - 243

History

Published online: Mar 1, 1997
Published in print: Mar 1997

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Paula A. Labieniec
Independent Consultant, 10701 Spring Run Rd., Chesterfield, VA 23832.
David A. Dzombak
Assoc. Prof., Dept. of Civ. and Envir. Engrg., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Robert L. Siegrist, Members, ASCE
Res. Assoc. Prof., Envir. Sci. and Engrg. Div., Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download citation

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

View Options

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Get Access

Access content

Please select your options to get access

Log in/Register Log in via your institution (Shibboleth)
ASCE Members: Please log in to see member pricing

Purchase

Save for later Information on ASCE Library Cards
ASCE Library Cards let you download journal articles, proceedings papers, and available book chapters across the entire ASCE Library platform. ASCE Library Cards remain active for 24 months or until all downloads are used. Note: This content will be debited as one download at time of checkout.

Terms of Use: ASCE Library Cards are for individual, personal use only. Reselling, republishing, or forwarding the materials to libraries or reading rooms is prohibited.
ASCE Library Card (5 downloads)
$105.00
Add to cart
ASCE Library Card (20 downloads)
$280.00
Add to cart
Buy Single Article
$35.00
Add to cart

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share