Importance Weighting of Impacts in Environmental Impact Studies
Publication: Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123, Issue 12
Abstract
Environmental impact studies typically compare and evaluate many impacts covering a wide range of considerations including socioeconomic, human interest, geoenvironmental, and political factors. Therefore, evaluation of the importance of impacts in the decision-making process is not an easy task. Information on the environmental impacts of the investigated action and its alternatives can often best be presented in a comparative form. Such a comparison not only defines the issues, but also provides a clear basis for decision making. This study presents systematic methods used for comparing and evaluating impacts using the cesspool system in the city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, as a case study. A structured importance weighting approach relying on a ranked paired-comparison technique and an unranked paired-comparison technique has been used in this study. These decision-analysis techniques basically involve a series of comparisons between impacts and a systematic tabulation of the numerical results of these comparisons. An Environmental Evaluation Systems (EES) and an Unranked Decision Matrix (UDM) have been developed for comparison and evaluation of 17 impacts of the cesspool system. The results of the study provide the necessary guidelines for Jeddah Municipality and Jeddah Water and Wastewater Department to deal with the current problems and future planning of the sewage system in the city.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Bose, D., and Bose, B. (1995). “Evaluation of alternatives for a water project using a multiobjective decision matrix.”Water International, IWRA, N.M., Vol. 20, 169–175.
2.
Canter, L. W. (1996). Environmental impact assessment, 2nd Ed., McGraw-Hill Inc., New York, N.Y.
3.
Dean, B. V., and Nishry, J. J.(1965). “Scoping and profitability models for evaluating and selecting engineering products.”J. Operations Res. Soc. of Am., 13(4), 550–569.
4.
Dee, N. et al. (1972). “Environmental evaluation system for water resources planning.”Final Report, Battelle-Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
5.
Dee, N. et al. (1973). “Planning methodology for water quality management: environmental evaluation system (EES).”Final Report, Battelle-Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio.
6.
Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M. (1975). The Delphi method—techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Mass.
7.
Mohorjy, A. M. et al. (1996). “Environment impact assessment of sewerage system in Jeddah.” King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (KACST), Project No. AR-13-37, Final Report, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
8.
Zahran, S. Z., and Fatani, M. N. Y. (1997). “Glass fiber reinforced asphalt paving mixture, feasibility assessment.”J. King Abdulaziz Univ., Engrg. Sci. Div., Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (accepted for publication).
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Journal of Environmental Engineering
Volume 123 • Issue 12 • December 1997
Pages: 1261 - 1267
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 American Society of Civil Engineers.
History
Published online: Dec 1, 1997
Published in print: Dec 1997
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Download citation
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.